Is this Cheryl Cole's extended tattoo?

123457

Comments

  • zx50zx50 Posts: 91,200
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    BellaRosa wrote: »
    Once a chav always a chav :rolleyes:

    Why do you think she's a chav for?
  • redcherryredcherry Posts: 12,333
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I don't like the tattoo and I don't like Cheryl however I respect her right to do what she wants to her own body regarding tattoo
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 53,142
    Forum Member
    did you get her knickers off for the guy to do it properly, or did he just go round the knicker lining lol
  • John DoughJohn Dough Posts: 146,117
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    As much as I hate the tattoo, I can't believe people are still talking about it on 2 separate threads!! It's not that newsworthy, surely?

    Well it's the 'main story' on the front page of The Sun on a Sunday in August..........;) I can't wait until that particular rag 'turns negative' on her,it's bound to happen sooner or later......:sleep:
  • mountymounty Posts: 19,135
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Orangemaid wrote: »
    did you get her knickers off for the guy to do it properly, or did he just go round the knicker lining lol

    definitely

    knickers off

    :cool:
  • JasonJason Posts: 76,557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Orangemaid wrote: »
    did you get her knickers off for the guy to do it properly, or did he just go round the knicker lining lol

    That's what I wondered earlier in the thread - what modesty is she trying to preserve with those knickers when her whole arse is basically on show anyway ?
  • Bus Stop2012Bus Stop2012 Posts: 5,624
    Forum Member
    Zora wrote: »
    Hang on - are people not allowed an opinion on tattoos now? I know almost everyone and their dog has one these days, but still.

    When it comes to Cheryl's tat, I think it's just as reasonable to describe it as "nasty" as it is to describe it as beautiful. It's a subjective thing (although I personally think it looks genuinely disgusting) and I don't see anyone trying to dictate what people can and can't do with their bodies - quite the opposite as many people are saying Cheryl can do what she likes even though they have also said they hate it.

    Tattoo lovers can be so chippy and defensive it's ridiculous.

    They can. I wonder, in the case of those who keep going back for more - and often admit they are slightly addicted to it - whether its a bit like smoking: they enjoy it and want to keep doing it, but deep down they would rather that cigs had never been invented or that they had never taken it up.

    With tattoos I always think of the 'why would you treat your body like a toilet wall' quote.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,607
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Zora wrote: »
    Hang on - are people not allowed an opinion on tattoos now? I know almost everyone and their dog has one these days, but still.

    When it comes to Cheryl's tat, I think it's just as reasonable to describe it as "nasty" as it is to describe it as beautiful. It's a subjective thing (although I personally think it looks genuinely disgusting) and I don't see anyone trying to dictate what people can and can't do with their bodies - quite the opposite as many people are saying Cheryl can do what she likes even though they have also said they hate it.

    Tattoo lovers can be so chippy and defensive it's ridiculous.

    Whilst I agree it's okay think it's "nasty" or "beautiful" and most people do seem to feel its her choice. I have read comments here claiming she has "ruined" her body (as if its existence is there for their aesthetic enjoyment alone) or that her career is suddenly over :confused:

    Tattoo haters 'can' be quite judgemental and childish. Although the best they generally offer is the threatening "that'll look nice when she's 60/70/80" as if that bloody means anything! It's as if they think they are getting the last laugh: "haha Cheryl, when your arse sags and is covered in wrinkles noone will want to see it because of that tattoo, serves you right" Anyone would think saggy elderly arses are all over the place, the public are crying out for more, except the ones with tattoos. We don't want to see the ones with tattoos, because that shit's nasty :D

    Personally I neither love or hate tattoos, I wouldn't have Cheryl's but believe it is her choice to do what she wants. You only live once.
  • zx50zx50 Posts: 91,200
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Orangemaid wrote: »
    did you get her knickers off for the guy to do it properly, or did he just go round the knicker lining lol

    Imagine a man tattooing a woman's nice looking backside with her knickers down. He'd have probably had to have ignored the fact that he was actually looking at a woman's backside when her knickers were so far down. One way to get things happening for a man. Phew!
  • JasonJason Posts: 76,557
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    zx50 wrote: »
    Imagine a man tattooing a woman's nice looking backside with her knickers down. He'd have probably had to have ignored the fact that he was actually looking at a woman's backside when her knickers were so far down. One way to get things happening for a man. Phew!

    I know discussing the 'technicalities' of whether or not it was knickers on or off probably makes me sound like a steaming great perv .. but .. I suspect it would most likely have been a g-string. It would afforded the most amount of "access" and would have also most likely have shielded "that" part of her anatomy from view.

    That said, perhaps she really trusted the tattooist? :eek:
  • Squealer_MahonySquealer_Mahony Posts: 6,483
    Forum Member
    zx50 wrote: »
    Imagine a man tattooing a woman's nice looking backside with her knickers down. He'd have probably had to have ignored the fact that he was actually looking at a woman's backside when her knickers were so far down. One way to get things happening for a man. Phew!

    Maybe he tattoos arses all the time and is used to it?
    Like a doctor. And if he spent 8 + hours drawing on it maybe the novelty wore off after a while.
  • Tweacle Tart IITweacle Tart II Posts: 5,079
    Forum Member
    Cantona07 wrote: »
    Not at all. I didnt mention anything about money until you posted I took a photo for you..
    Cantona07 wrote: »
    Actually, i dont need to justify myself. Im not here to flaunt anything. However there is no correlation between having tattos and not being successful.

    None whatsoever.

    Oh, is that another hasty back peddle?
    Cantona07 wrote: »
    I can help myself easily. I just choose not to.

    I took a pic of my £6k Rolex and my £500 Seiko kinetic but whats the point? (the Tag is away getting serviced).

    The point is i do ok. Im not trying to be boastful to impress you. The point is my tattoos havent stopped me getting these trinkets.

    Im good at my job. Im not "council" in any way, shape or form, you should respect me for who i am not for whats on my arms.

    Indeed it is coupled with more uncouth bragging.

    Like I said, I have never mentioned anything about money or success in relation to tattoos. The only person who has is you. I just think they're tacky and common.
  • fefsterfefster Posts: 7,388
    Forum Member
    Her arse looks like what I imagine Bishop Brennan's looked like after he had been kicked by Father Ted. Bruised.
  • fefsterfefster Posts: 7,388
    Forum Member
    Cantona07 wrote: »
    the Tag is away getting serviced).

    Your electronic tag?
  • wilehelmaswilehelmas Posts: 3,610
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    fefster wrote: »
    Her arse looks like what I imagine Bishop Brennan's looked like after he had been kicked by Father Ted. Bruised.

    Lol.

    "He DID kick mee up deearse!"
  • VoynichVoynich Posts: 14,481
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Looks like a giant burn or bruise. She's definitely got the tattoo bug! I can't see her being able to resist adding to it.
  • zx50zx50 Posts: 91,200
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Maybe he tattoos arses all the time and is used to it?
    Like a doctor. And if he spent 8 + hours drawing on it maybe the novelty wore off after a while.

    I don't think it would have, but the feeling might not have been as strong as it would have for others who don't get to see different women's backsides sometimes.
  • occyoccy Posts: 64,318
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The only people who would see it is the ones she's having sex with. Is she sleeping around?
  • jeff_vaderjeff_vader Posts: 938
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    As much as I hate the tattoo, I can't believe people are still talking about it on 2 separate threads!! It's not that newsworthy, surely?
    John Dough wrote: »
    Well it's the 'main story' on the front page of The Sun on a Sunday in August..........;) I can't wait until that particular rag 'turns negative' on her,it's bound to happen sooner or later......:sleep:

    ^ this. Pretty much. And I'd rather see her floral derriere than CallMeDave's gutbucket.

    Plus she's a national treasure, izznit she? :D
  • user986user986 Posts: 138
    Forum Member
    I find her tattoo hideous but whatever she does with her bum, it's her own business. Imagine though when she'll be an old lady how attractive that rose "garden" is going to look.... ;)
  • GoatyGoaty Posts: 7,776
    Forum Member
    A top showbiz thread is about a (no voice) singer's tattoo?

    Oh wow, and yes it looks so horrible!
  • zx50zx50 Posts: 91,200
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Goaty wrote: »
    A top showbiz thread is about a (no voice) singer's tattoo?

    Oh wow, and yes it looks so horrible!

    So how does she manage to sing in a recording studio if she doesn't use her voice then? Mm?
  • That_GuyThat_Guy Posts: 1,421
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    What does it look like when she does a jobbie?
  • zx50zx50 Posts: 91,200
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    That_Guy wrote: »
    What does it look like when she does a jobbie?

    I highly doubt anyone on here would be lucky enough to know that.
  • ScarletStarletScarletStarlet Posts: 2,390
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    *resisting urge to make joke about her rolling over so you can see her tulips*
Sign In or Register to comment.