saw them, totally inaccurate as well, even minus the timeshift the show is easily out rating the ratings before the show was canned. And the comparison ignores the fact that back then there were 4 tv channels and that shows regularly got 20 million viewers....:rolleyes:
Karen had one while in the States (resulting in a bruise on her arm which she hoped Craig Ferguson wouldn't notice and bring up during their interview , he did ).
Karen had one while in the States (resulting in a bruise on her arm which she hoped Craig Ferguson wouldn't notice and bring up during their interview , he did ).
AI of 87, so actually one point lower than last week, but hardly supports the idea people can't deal with the dumbed down/too complicated storyline....:D
plus side is it gives them more time to study tv...:)
Given their rather bizarre views on the imminent cancellation of DW, I'd rather assumed they'd been studying transvestites rather than television....:D
Given their rather bizarre views on the imminent cancellation of DW, I'd rather assumed they'd been studying transvestites rather than television....:D
AI of 87, so actually one point lower than last week, but hardly supports the idea people can't deal with the dumbed down/too complicated storyline....:D
AI of 87, so actually one point lower than last week, but hardly supports the idea people can't deal with the dumbed down/too complicated storyline....:D
I must admit that after not finding last series overly impressive (that's not to say I didn't enjoy it, just not as much as previous years), this series has started superbly.
I think these two episodes blow anything from last season out of the water, and I have really high hopes for the rest of the series.
It's interesting that the first 2 AI's seem to be slightly higher than the majority of last year, so perhaps the viewing public at large share my view....
I must admit that after not finding last series overly impressive (that's not to say I didn't enjoy it, just not as much as previous years), this series has started superbly.
I think these two episodes blow anything from last season out of the water, and I have really high hopes for the rest of the series.
It's interesting that the first 2 AI's seem to be slightly higher than the majority of last year, so perhaps the viewing public at large share my view....
I am pleased to hear you enjoyed the story, i know it's not much fun if you don't enjoy a series much as i didn't like series 2. Much as I loved these stories, i would still rate two or three storys last year ahead of this one though!:)
The AI's are up on early last series, but you have to bear in mind that the first half of the series was something of a transition period so one would expect slightly lower ai's at that time, and they did increase as the series progressed.
I'm interested to see how the data develops this year anyway...:)
I am pleased to hear you enjoyed the story, i know it's not much fun if you don't enjoy a series much as i didn't like series 2. Much as I loved these stories, i would still rate two or three storys last year ahead of this one though!:)
The AI's are up on early last series, but you have to bear in mind that the first half of the series was something of a transition period so one would expect slightly lower ai's at that time, and they did increase as the series progressed.
I'm interested to see how the data develops this year anyway...:)
To me AI is hugely important as it judges the 'feel' for an episode from both ardent and casual fans alike, and DW's AI ratings since 2005 have been nothing short of excellent, and quite rightly so IMO.....
If this series continues it's very strong start (and next weeks episode looks to be a corker) then I'm sure this trend will continue...
Was it just me or have they ever so slightly tweaked the theme tune? There is now more bumbumbumbumbumbum in the bass sound compared to last year! I sounded a lot better! Unless of course I've been listening to exactly the same theme as last year but didn't notice!
Anyway just checked the Jack list. We have 87 to reduce to 50. :eek::eek:How do you want to do it?
well i think it will be slightly more, i am just going to bold the ones i think might need to be broken down in to separate moments, let me know what you think, or if you see others that should be! :eek:
well i think it will be slightly more, i am just going to bold the ones i think might need to be broken down in to separate moments, let me know what you think, or if you see others that should be! :eek:
what is this i am reading on twitter about our prime minister supporting a campaign to stop gay couples kissing/embracing on tv before 9pm? If this is true then i have to say i don't think we should have a prim minister who would support such blatant discrimination! :eek:
what is this i am reading on twitter about our prime minister supporting a campaign to stop gay couples kissing/embracing on tv before 9pm? If this is true then i have to say i don't think we should have a prim minister who would support such blatant discrimination! :eek:
Comments
Argh! The comment under the article! Ratings!
saw them, totally inaccurate as well, even minus the timeshift the show is easily out rating the ratings before the show was canned. And the comparison ignores the fact that back then there were 4 tv channels and that shows regularly got 20 million viewers....:rolleyes:
Karen had one while in the States (resulting in a bruise on her arm which she hoped Craig Ferguson wouldn't notice and bring up during their interview
"why do i let you out alone"
Given their rather bizarre views on the imminent cancellation of DW, I'd rather assumed they'd been studying transvestites rather than television....:D
everything suddenly becomes clear! :eek:
Aye, 87 certainly not to be sniffed at is it.
Good stuff!
I must admit that after not finding last series overly impressive (that's not to say I didn't enjoy it, just not as much as previous years), this series has started superbly.
I think these two episodes blow anything from last season out of the water, and I have really high hopes for the rest of the series.
It's interesting that the first 2 AI's seem to be slightly higher than the majority of last year, so perhaps the viewing public at large share my view....
I am pleased to hear you enjoyed the story, i know it's not much fun if you don't enjoy a series much as i didn't like series 2. Much as I loved these stories, i would still rate two or three storys last year ahead of this one though!:)
The AI's are up on early last series, but you have to bear in mind that the first half of the series was something of a transition period so one would expect slightly lower ai's at that time, and they did increase as the series progressed.
I'm interested to see how the data develops this year anyway...:)
To me AI is hugely important as it judges the 'feel' for an episode from both ardent and casual fans alike, and DW's AI ratings since 2005 have been nothing short of excellent, and quite rightly so IMO.....
If this series continues it's very strong start (and next weeks episode looks to be a corker) then I'm sure this trend will continue...
Happy days....
Seems to have been made before the series started airing, and Arthurs got his lovely pheasant jumper on again :rolleyes:
A couple of points stood out for me, I'll put them in spoiler tags below although the first two aren't that spoilery and may be old news
http://i.imgur.com/GVbXM.jpg
Goddamnit Steve!:D
Steve Silent and Jimmy Big Hands!
Consider that yoinked...... * Looks at screen name* It wasn't me lol
he said he was at a street party on friday!:D
I'm so sad I've recorded it!
Anyway just checked the Jack list. We have 87 to reduce to 50. :eek::eek:How do you want to do it?
well i think it will be slightly more, i am just going to bold the ones i think might need to be broken down in to separate moments, let me know what you think, or if you see others that should be! :eek:
OK I'll check again later
i've done it, just a few to consider.:)
I'm hoping it's not true!
Reported here by DS: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s3/coronation-street/news/a317367/brooke-vincent-slams-cameron-gay-rights-support.html
It's mind boggling if true...but i don't see a quote from Cameron, though. But if it's true what a disgrace!!!!! :eek: