I keep getting spam e-mails trying to con me into buying products to make me more "adequate", perhaps I should forward one of those onto someone at the BBC?
Or maybe the BBC isn't inadequate in that particular department?
I keep getting spam e-mails trying to con me into buying products to make me more "adequate", perhaps I should forward one of those onto someone at the BBC?
Or maybe the BBC isn't inadequate in that particular department?
beeb endlessly has sand kicked in face by tabloid bullies ....... maybe needs a charles atlas course ? In just 7 days u can have tv channels like THESE.......
beeb endlessly has sand kicked in face by tabloid bullies ....... maybe needs a charles atlas course ? In just 7 days u can have tv channels like THESE.......
Surely tabloids are allowed to and should scrutinize the BBC?
Surely tabloids are allowed to and should scrutinize the BBC?
If that's all they did that would be fine. But four of the five tabs (Sun, Star, Mail, Express) are owned by people with vested interests in destroying the BBC (Murdoch, Richard Desmond, Associated Newspapers). Therefore they don't so much scrutinise as nit-pick. And when it's done back to them, it's an "abuse of power" by the BBC. Can't win.
If that's all they did that would be fine. But four of the five tabs (Sun, Star, Mail, Express) are owned by people with vested interests in destroying the BBC (Murdoch, Richard Desmond, Associated Newspapers). Therefore they don't so much scrutinise as nit-pick. And when it's done back to them, it's an "abuse of power" by the BBC. Can't win.
The BBC will always get criticized, it has to accept that as PSB this will happen. One persons knit picking (and i'm not saying it doesn't happen) is another persons legitimate criticism.
Criticism is fine, where it goes awry is when that criticism is far from justified at any reasonable level, where it lacks any credibility and panders only to those with an agenda or fixation.
Criticism is fine, where it goes awry is when that criticism is far from justified at any reasonable level, where it lacks any credibility and panders only to those with an agenda or fixation.
Alternatively there are those on this forum who believe any criticism of the BBC is unjustified and will resort to personal abuse to those who don't share their own view of things.
I think these people lack credibility.
Alternatively there are those on this forum who believe any criticism of the BBC is unjustified and will resort to personal abuse to those who don't share their own view of things.
I believe that no one poster on this forum has ever indicated that any criticism of the BBC is justified, or that the BBC is perfect.
Personal abuse, if given, should be reported as this contravenes the DS posting guidelines.
Alternatively there are those on this forum who believe any criticism of the BBC is unjustified and will resort to personal abuse to those who don't share their own view of things.
I think these people lack credibility.
There is constructive criticism where constructive criticism is due.
Then there are several threads with nonsense titles like "The BBC is a national disgrace".
Alternatively there are those on this forum who believe any criticism of the BBC is unjustified and will resort to personal abuse to those who don't share their own view of things.
I think these people lack credibility.
Maybe if you did not personally start multiple threads about the BBC basically all saying the same thing you would not get such abuse, perhaps can you explain why you feel it is alright for you to break the forum rules by continually spamming the forum with your anti BBC bile?
I believe that no one poster on this forum has ever indicated that any criticism of the BBC is justified, or that the BBC is perfect.
Personal abuse, if given, should be reported as this contravenes the DS posting guidelines.
I think it depends on who you personally abuse. Personal abuse is not tolerated unless it is towards someone with any type of sympathy towards UKIP or anyone who questions the existence of the BBC it seems.
Maybe if you did not personally start multiple threads about the BBC basically all saying the same thing you would not get such abuse, perhaps can you explain why you feel it is alright for you to break the forum rules by continually spamming the forum with your anti BBC bile?
If you feel that's the case why haven't you reported the member in question?
I think it depends on who you personally abuse. Personal abuse is not tolerated unless it is towards someone with any type of sympathy towards UKIP or anyone who questions the existence of the BBC it seems.
And also whether the "insulted" person either has actually been or if they think the abuse isn't really worth reporting.
Comments
Of course and you're welcome to it.
It is something that does get repeated quite often on here though. That was my point. It was not aimed at you personally.
And repeating it twice was simply an attempt at joviality
All cuts and rises in public services finances are political.
How does one make it adequate?
I keep getting spam e-mails trying to con me into buying products to make me more "adequate", perhaps I should forward one of those onto someone at the BBC?
Or maybe the BBC isn't inadequate in that particular department?
beeb endlessly has sand kicked in face by tabloid bullies ....... maybe needs a charles atlas course ? In just 7 days u can have tv channels like THESE.......
Surely tabloids are allowed to and should scrutinize the BBC?
ITV are a commercial organisation they can show as many repeats as they want as long as its within the law.
If that's all they did that would be fine. But four of the five tabs (Sun, Star, Mail, Express) are owned by people with vested interests in destroying the BBC (Murdoch, Richard Desmond, Associated Newspapers). Therefore they don't so much scrutinise as nit-pick. And when it's done back to them, it's an "abuse of power" by the BBC. Can't win.
The BBC will always get criticized, it has to accept that as PSB this will happen. One persons knit picking (and i'm not saying it doesn't happen) is another persons legitimate criticism.
Alternatively there are those on this forum who believe any criticism of the BBC is unjustified and will resort to personal abuse to those who don't share their own view of things.
I think these people lack credibility.
And would show even more if there was no BBC as competition.
Personal abuse, if given, should be reported as this contravenes the DS posting guidelines.
There is constructive criticism where constructive criticism is due.
Then there are several threads with nonsense titles like "The BBC is a national disgrace".
Maybe if you did not personally start multiple threads about the BBC basically all saying the same thing you would not get such abuse, perhaps can you explain why you feel it is alright for you to break the forum rules by continually spamming the forum with your anti BBC bile?
I think it depends on who you personally abuse. Personal abuse is not tolerated unless it is towards someone with any type of sympathy towards UKIP or anyone who questions the existence of the BBC it seems.
How could you possibly know this? Predicting what the media would be like without the BBC would be near impossible to do.
If you feel that's the case why haven't you reported the member in question?
Start a thread with an inflammatory title, and a hyperbolic statement, and is it any wonder it got the response that it got?
Just look at TV around the world, and also, ITV is bad enough already with the BBC as competition, without the BBC ITV really would go to rubbish,
ITV drama competes with BBC drama, ITV sport competes with BBC sport, and therefore it gets better.
Go to bed Mr Waring