Options
Daily Mail is the best website for celebrity news... Who agrees?
madeinliverpool
Posts: 86
Forum Member
✭
Maybe it is because I am a proud right-winga but the Daily Mail really is the best website for celebrity news. It's always the quickest to load, has great pictures, is regularly updated, and covers lots of different angles.
Does anyone else agree, or use it regularly?
Does anyone else agree, or use it regularly?
0
Comments
Really? Worse than the Star, Sun, commie patronising Guardian etc.
I was talking about the website too.
Needless to say lots of s**t-stirring hypocritical rubbish aswell that assumes that readers are unthinking idiots but definitely worth a look everyday if you apply your common sense to what you're looking at.
They're well known for fabricating stories, making up witnesses to alleged events ..... I think I primarily go there for the comments, which are often quite hilarious.
I will never, ever, believe anything that they write.
I wouldn't read anything on that hate-peddling website. Plus they were recently proven to completely make up news stories.
"One of" the worst.
The website is also bad, full of crap just like the paper. Their stories are inaccurate much of the time, and most of the stories I just don't care about anyway.
There are some top nutters posting on there!
Are you Danielle Lloyd?
Don't bother with the news on it though - I just get me celeb fix
I'll raise you a Blackshirt supporting Daily Wail
Don't forget the tax avoidance of the Grauniad as well! And their millionaire socialist writers writing columns from their villas abroad calling on the rest of us to be taxed more.
I hate the Mail's war on the BBC, there were more complaints about blagging by the Mirror and Mail group than the whole of News International but they seem to have escaped investigation so far. But their website is well presented though the celebrity side is dominated by Americans who I often never heard of. They will one day praise how good someone looks then next day say criticise them. They keep repeating the same phrases - anyone in a short skirt "leaves nothing to the imagination" etc.
Their editorial line and comments sometimes leave me rolling my eyes, as do some of the more popular narratives -She's too fat! Now she's lost weight! Her relationship has broken up as she gets a hot younger man as a result of losing weight!- All from three sets of photographs.
I don't know if it's worse, but the Sun and Star don't masquerade as serious newspapers.
So the argument goes.
I get the feeling that The Sun might be being more carefully now after all the hacking scandals though as I wrote there were far more complaints about the Mirror and Mail groups than News International. The Mirror can be a much worse paper than the other tabloids and got involved in an attempt at a really nasty smear by the previous Labour regime. But they don't get as many attacks on them from the Left wing press as News International does.
Let me take you back to 2004 when every paper in the land reported Christopher Eccleston to be the new Doctor Who. That is all..................except The Daily Mail! Hardly the best website for celeb news and the rest of their journalists are not up to scratch either. Plenty of them still refer to Diabetes as a disease. That was this year! Anyone who has Diabetes know full well that it is not a disease, but a condition that may be caused by a disease or something else. Can't even get their basic medical facts right. So I don't think The Daily Mail are particularly reliable. Richard Littlejohn can get stuffed!
It's also very anti- women. We are all either too old, too young, too fat, too thin, wear too much make up, don't wear enough make up etc etc.
Yes it's an easy site to use, but some of the articles are really badly written with poor grammar and spelling mistakes as well.
Our family has always read the Mail, even though I admit that they have got celeb gossip wrong on MANY occasions. Personally though, the most reliable place for your celebrity and showbiz gossip is DS...