Phones4U - No refunds for upfront iPhone 6 payments

Everything GoesEverything Goes Posts: 12,972
Forum Member
✭✭
Phones4U emailed iPhone 6 pre-orderer customers who made an upfront payment telling them, they will not receive a refund. The email tells ex-customers there basically won't be any refunds, and suggests they contact their credit card provider to dispute the charge.


Anyone that can't go to a credit card company for help is pretty much out of luck, although there is another option that involves submitting a refund claim to PwC. The problem with that is there's a high possibility it'll be more trouble than it's worth. A disclaimer on the claim page reads "Please note, given the level of secured liabilities, if there is any dividend to unsecured creditors, any payment if made at all, would not be for many months and is likely to be negligible." In normal-speak, this means if you seek a refund, your request will join a long line of companies/individuals Phones4u owes money to as a priority. And considering the company's just folded, there's unlikely to be any left for you when all the larger debts have been squared away.

http://www.engadget.com/2014/09/25/phones4u-iphone-6-refunds-no-dice/

Comments

  • TheRottweilerTheRottweiler Posts: 95
    Forum Member
    I don't understand that as the company was in profit at the time of closing

    It's all very fishy
  • PadrePadre Posts: 1,516
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I don't understand that as the company was in profit at the time of closing

    It's all very fishy

    Nothing fishy about it at all, 2 private equity firms brought Phones4U for £1.5 billion. Like all private equity companies they did not use their own money to buy the company, they borrowed money against future earnings of Phones4U. So in effect Phones4U was brought using Phones4U own assets, get your head round that if you can.

    The problem doing this is, that most of the company profits have to go to pay back that debt and are not re-invested into the company. This is fine as long as the company is making profit and is expected to continue making a profit. But as soon as there is any threat to those profits, such as the last of Phones4U partners walking away. Then the banks want their money back straight away, before there is no money left.

    This left Phones4U unable to service their debts and the rest is history.

    Of course the shareholders, the private equity firms, taking £200,000,000 in dividends last year didn't help, that would have serviced the debt for quiet some time and probably allowed the company to restructure and survive. Anybody might think they knew what was coming.

    Add to that the fact that the private equity firms get nice tax deductibles for all that debt, so pay very little tax and the fact that they were never actually liable for the loan, Phones4U was, they were quids in.

    As I said nothing fishy, nothing illegal.

    Of course whether it should be is a whole different discussion!
  • TassiumTassium Posts: 31,639
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The UK is corruptly governed, that's quite certain.
  • sethpetsethpet Posts: 497
    Forum Member
    I don't understand that as the company was in profit at the time of closing

    It's all very fishy

    Book profit does not = cash in the bank

    Also if you check the last filled accounts i beleive you will find the business does not have enough cash or asset value to satisfy its liabilities
  • davethorpdavethorp Posts: 8,701
    Forum Member
    If people paid using a debit card they should still be able to get money back using chargeback. Credit cards offer more protection but a debit card should be covered too

    http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/shopping/visa-mastercard-chargeback
  • Everything GoesEverything Goes Posts: 12,972
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    davethorp wrote: »
    If people paid using a debit card they should still be able to get money back using chargeback. Credit cards offer more protection but a debit card should be covered too

    http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/shopping/visa-mastercard-chargeback

    And if you paid cash good luck you'll need it!
  • walterwhitewalterwhite Posts: 56,806
    Forum Member
    sethpet wrote: »
    Book profit does not = cash in the bank

    Also if you check the last filled accounts i beleive you will find the business does not have enough cash or asset value to satisfy its liabilities

    Exactly. Amazes me how many people confuse profit and cash.
  • anyonefortennisanyonefortennis Posts: 111,858
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    And if you paid cash good luck you'll need it!

    Who would pay for a phone contract using cash? Nobody. In order to take out a phone contract with Phones4U or another company, you have to give them your credit/ debit card details for the direct debit amount of your contract to come out of your account every month.
  • d123d123 Posts: 8,604
    Forum Member
    davethorp wrote: »
    If people paid using a debit card they should still be able to get money back using chargeback. Credit cards offer more protection but a debit card should be covered too

    http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/shopping/visa-mastercard-chargeback

    Unfortunately Debit card chargeback is not a legal right, and is something that the banks don't have to do, or can try and fail, and then decline the chargeback.

    From your link:
    Chargeback is nowhere near as strong as Section 75 for credit card purchases. The key difference is that when you complain under Section 75, the credit card company itself is legally liable. With chargeback it's just about the Visa/Mastercard/Amex process, and that's nowhere near as weighty. It's also the case that you can't take the issue to court if your bank won't pay.
  • davethorpdavethorp Posts: 8,701
    Forum Member
    Which is why I said should. Although if a bank won't do a chargeback you can complain to the FOS
  • GigabitGigabit Posts: 8,768
    Forum Member
    Why wouldn't you buy a phone with a credit card?
  • GigabitGigabit Posts: 8,768
    Forum Member
    Existing thread...
  • whoever,heywhoever,hey Posts: 30,992
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Gigabit wrote: »
    Why wouldn't you buy a phone with a credit card?

    You can not pay direct debits from a CC for a contract.
  • sethpetsethpet Posts: 497
    Forum Member
    Hope the op knows he should have gone too spec savers
  • BKMBKM Posts: 6,912
    Forum Member
    TWO existing threads are on this very topic!
  • John_PatrickJohn_Patrick Posts: 924
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    So basically its OK for someone to buy p4u using the tax system to their benefit and thousands of employees and customers (with deposits etc) loose out but when Joe Public use the tax system to their benefit (EBT's etc) then its classed as immoral and HMRC come chasing.

    What a country we live in eh?
  • d123d123 Posts: 8,604
    Forum Member
    So basically its OK for someone to buy p4u using the tax system to their benefit and thousands of employees and customers (with deposits etc) loose out but when Joe Public use the tax system to their benefit (EBT's etc) then its classed as immoral and HMRC come chasing.

    What a country we live in eh?

    In fairness to the UK, it could happen in most free market/capitalist countries.
  • oilmanoilman Posts: 4,529
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    See other email re car phone warehouse.
Sign In or Register to comment.