Vote to Eliminate??

[Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 267
Forum Member
Do you think it would make a difference if vote to eliminate was brought in? Do you think it would be fairer on the acts with smaller fan bases?
Or would it be disastrous like BB with the more high profile/interesting acts at risk of being voted out each week?

Comments

  • SelenaSelena Posts: 29,595
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    No it should stay vote to save.

    If an acts got a small fan base then they won't sell many records.

    Also first the public would vote the marmite charecters off ie. Nicolo and Storm, then the biggest threats would go ie. Rebecca and Matt and we be left with people not many feel passionate about so don't change the voting.
  • tommygunnertommygunner Posts: 4,252
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    They will never do that because it would feed the frenzy of internet campaigns and also would probably result in less revenue.

    If you're an obsessed hater right now you have to vote for all the other contestants to vote "No" on someone.;)
  • PhoebicaPhoebica Posts: 2,863
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It would make a difference, but not in a good way. People like Cher and Katie would be first off regardless of how good they were, and we'd be left with the likes of John and Mary in the final because nobody cares enough about them to get rid of them. The voting is fine as it is, people vote for their favourite – that's how it should be. We want the most popular to win, not the least hated. There is a difference.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6,334
    Forum Member
    God that sort of voting would give the skeleton seekers and the newspapers a REAL field day ....no thanks ...stay positive ..they're heading for 'the rainbow's end' these contestants and are working their butts off on the way to achieve it....credit where credit's due
Sign In or Register to comment.