Jeanette article in Sunday papers. .

124»

Comments

  • Alli-FAlli-F Posts: 32,519
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    wazzyboy wrote: »
    Nothing to apologise for. I think we just misunderstood each other.



    No worries hun, it's easily done. ;) My annual lesson on reading posts properly learned. :o:D
  • mimi dlcmimi dlc Posts: 13,423
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Pet Monkey wrote: »
    So because posters want to keep a board that discusses the silly little tv programme exactly as they want it, they have the right to tell others how to behave, and to dismiss them on no authority other than impatience?

    It's high-handed, to put it as mildly as possible.

    It's rude.

    I apologise if I have ever told you or others to get back in the Attic, though it doesn't sound like my style.

    However I would LOVE to be one of the Mods on Digital Spy- shall we see if there are any job vacancies going?:D
  • Smokeychan1Smokeychan1 Posts: 12,130
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    mimi dlc wrote: »
    Bit in bold.

    It's a silly little forum about a silly little tv program, not the re-introduction of Apartheid

    I'd dispute that actually.

    When someone suggests that one person should be confined to a sub-forum all by themselves and that suggestion is "applauded" by others simply because they don't like the person's style of writing, or their likes and dislikes in terms of presenter or professional dancer or celeb, then segregation based on personal bias is exactly what some members are supporting.

    EDIT for some on-topicness: I think I may change a habit of a lifetime and choose a favourite partnership from the off. J&J are looking more and more likely :D
  • Pet MonkeyPet Monkey Posts: 11,923
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    mimi dlc wrote: »
    I apologise if I have ever told you or others to get back in the Attic, though it doesn't sound like my style.

    However I would LOVE to be one of the Mods on Digital Spy- shall we see if there are any job vacancies going?:D

    I doubt you have done! It doesn't sound like you.

    Being a mod... Bwerr! I wouldn't do it. It's that stuff wazzyboy's talking about... Even if you could understand every point of view, to gauge the emotions behind them (as would be fair) needs Godlike powers.

    Eg, I say I don't like being told what to do, and a lot of post-coppertop posters assume it's an attack on the non app thread, which it isn't. It's my bolshiness kicking in.

    I'm sorry for being bad-tempered, which I was in my reply to coppertop.
  • mimi dlcmimi dlc Posts: 13,423
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I'd dispute that actually.

    When someone suggests that one person should be confined to a sub-forum all by themselves and that suggestion is "applauded" by others simply because they don't like the person's style of writing, or their likes and dislikes in terms of presenter or professional dancer or celeb, then segregation based on personal bias is exactly what some members are supporting.

    EDIT for some on-topicness: I think I may change a habit of a lifetime and choose a favourite partnership from the off. J&J are looking more and more likely :D

    Banged to rights Smokey!:o

    and good for you supporting Julien and Janette.... someone has to!
  • Smokeychan1Smokeychan1 Posts: 12,130
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    mimi dlc wrote: »
    and good for you supporting Julien and Janette.... someone has to!

    I'm not sure I can go much beyond week one :o:D
  • Kmc1978Kmc1978 Posts: 7,144
    Forum Member
    mimi dlc wrote: »
    Banged to rights Smokey!:o

    and good for you supporting Julien and Janette.... someone has to!
    I'm not sure I can go much beyond week one :o:D

    :D

    Ah, I do like Janette (what i've seen of her so far anyway), but there is no way on earth that I can ever see myself supporting Julien... I felt uptight even typing his name just then :o:p
  • Pet MonkeyPet Monkey Posts: 11,923
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Kmc1978 wrote: »
    I think that you have misunderstood. Coppertop said that it would be best for those who ONLY want to read positive comments to stay within the attic threads. "The Attic" is not used derogatively, it was a term coined when the forum was first split because the sub-forums were placed above the main forum, making it look like an attic conversion. The term is used regularly because it is easier to type that than typing Appreciation sub-forum... it's just another form of internet shorthand rather than an attempt at being rude.

    I know... It's the 'get back' part rather than the 'attic' bit.

    A lot of posters do keep to the attic. Others stop posting altogether. I think of how things are now on TV, compared to what I can remember back when I was little and my nan was alive. I can just about recall the pre-satellite, pre-cable days when you had four channels and everyone would sit and watch Antiques Roadshow, a programme about the wetlands, and Top of the Pops. It was on, you shared it. My nan didn't like Top of the Pops and I had to put up with a running commentary on the hair styles and clothes. I thought Antiques Roadshow was a guessing game about the price, and probably annoyed everyone with shouting out.

    But now kids can go and watch YouTube videos of exactly the thing they want to watch. Mam can enjoy a specialist cooking channel. You can watch sport all day. News all day etc.

    No one shares the weird tastes and proclivities of the others. It's bad! More variety is narrowing for the outlook. On those terms I am opposed to the dividing of the board...

    Yet I can see the arguments for having two distinct boards that have been given here and elsewhere. They make good practical sense. But there should be freedom of movement between them just to mix things up and avoid that narrowness. And maybe that means a little more acceptance.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,853
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    mimi dlc wrote: »
    Bit in bold.

    It's a silly little forum about a silly little tv program, not the re-introduction of Apartheid


    QFT

    If you start to feel your heart racing and blood boiling because of something somebody said on the Internet, particularly about a celebrity dancing with another celebrity, step away from the keyboard and do something else for a bit.
  • wazzyboywazzyboy Posts: 13,346
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Pet Monkey wrote: »
    I know... It's the 'get back' part rather than the 'attic' bit.

    A lot of posters do keep to the attic. Others stop posting altogether. I think of how things are now on TV, compared to what I can remember back when I was little and my nan was alive. I can just about recall the pre-satellite, pre-cable days when you had four channels and everyone would sit and watch Antiques Roadshow, a programme about the wetlands, and Top of the Pops. It was on, you shared it. My nan didn't like Top of the Pops and I had to put up with a running commentary on the hair styles and clothes. I thought Antiques Roadshow was a guessing game about the price, and probably annoyed everyone with shouting out.

    But now kids can go and watch YouTube videos of exactly the thing they want to watch. Mam can enjoy a specialist cooking channel. You can watch sport all day. News all day etc.

    No one shares the weird tastes and proclivities of the others. It's bad! More variety is narrowing for the outlook. On those terms I am opposed to the dividing of the board...

    Yet I can see the arguments for having two distinct boards that have been given here and elsewhere. They make good practical sense. But there should be freedom of movement between them just to mix things up and avoid that narrowness. And maybe that means a little more acceptance.

    isn't an attic where you store stuff rather than have it in active use?
  • Kmc1978Kmc1978 Posts: 7,144
    Forum Member
    wazzyboy wrote: »
    isn't an attic where you store stuff rather than have it in active use?

    I explained this one in an earlier post, it comes from when the sub-forums were first created & the (friendly) joke was that DS had done an attic conversion. The nickname stuck because it's a handy internet shorthand rather than typing Appreciation sub-forum all the time.

    Attic conversions are for things that are in active use & they are often created for a specific purpose.
  • wazzyboywazzyboy Posts: 13,346
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Kmc1978 wrote: »
    I explained this one in an earlier post, it comes from when the sub-forums were first created & the (friendly) joke was that DS had done an attic conversion. The nickname stuck because it's a handy internet shorthand rather than typing Appreciation sub-forum all the time.

    Attic conversions are for things that are in active use & they are often created for a specific purpose.

    I know you did, I was thinking about why the word was chosen and what its general usage is. :)
  • mimi dlcmimi dlc Posts: 13,423
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    wazzyboy wrote: »
    I know you did, I was thinking about why the word was chosen and what its general usage is. :)

    Maybe we should call it the penthouse apartment? That sounds really desirable
  • wazzyboywazzyboy Posts: 13,346
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    mimi dlc wrote: »
    Maybe we should call it the penthouse apartment? That sounds really desirable

    If you said attic to some people they might go looking for it with that name, not everyone catches on to the codes used around here.

    Same with unapp, non app, etc.

    Laborious I know, but better to stick with thread/subforum name maybe?

    Also I did say in the Everything Allowed thread, appreciation is not just a positive tern. It can include constructive cricitism. it doesn't have to all be positive or what is that other codeword used around here, oh yes, "fluffy".
  • Kmc1978Kmc1978 Posts: 7,144
    Forum Member
    Pet Monkey wrote: »
    I know... It's the 'get back' part rather than the 'attic' bit.

    A lot of posters do keep to the attic. Others stop posting altogether. I think of how things are now on TV, compared to what I can remember back when I was little and my nan was alive. I can just about recall the pre-satellite, pre-cable days when you had four channels and everyone would sit and watch Antiques Roadshow, a programme about the wetlands, and Top of the Pops. It was on, you shared it. My nan didn't like Top of the Pops and I had to put up with a running commentary on the hair styles and clothes. I thought Antiques Roadshow was a guessing game about the price, and probably annoyed everyone with shouting out.

    But now kids can go and watch YouTube videos of exactly the thing they want to watch. Mam can enjoy a specialist cooking channel. You can watch sport all day. News all day etc.

    No one shares the weird tastes and proclivities of the others. It's bad! More variety is narrowing for the outlook. On those terms I am opposed to the dividing of the board...

    Yet I can see the arguments for having two distinct boards that have been given here and elsewhere. They make good practical sense. But there should be freedom of movement between them just to mix things up and avoid that narrowness. And maybe that means a little more acceptance.

    TBH, i've never personally seen anyone say 'get back to the attic'. I'm not saying it hasn't happened because without trawling through every thread I cannot say whether it has or hasn't. I have seen posters suggest to other posters that maybe some things are more suited to the attic but often this has been when a poster has been attacked for being mean about/jealous of a contestant, despite that poster offering a valid reason for why they do not like that pro/contestant. In these instances, it's not a case of people trying to dictate how people should post but offering a suggestion that if someone can't accept reading negatives about their favourite then the attic is a more logical place for them to post. It may not always be phrased politely because often, if a thread is fast moving or someone is juggling multiple threads, posters do not always have time to review whether it could be phrased better. Some people will have the intention to be rude but if you feel that a post has crossed the line of the t&cs then it should really be reported and left to the mods to decide whether it's acceptable or not.

    Finally, I hope you won't find me rude if I do not reply to you (or anyone else that may have quoted one of my posts in the gazillion years it's taken me to compose this one) on this subject again on this thread, but it has all been seriously off-topic & I think that we should return to the subject of the thread before we all get told off by the mods :p:o
  • mimi dlcmimi dlc Posts: 13,423
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    wazzyboy wrote: »
    If you said attic to some people they might go looking for it with that name, not everyone catches on to the codes used around here.

    Same with unapp, non app, etc.

    Laborious I know, but better to stick with thread/subforum name maybe?

    Also I did say in the Everything Allowed thread, appreciation is not just a positive tern. It can include constructive cricitism. it doesn't have to all be positive or what is that other codeword used around here, oh yes, "fluffy".
    Codes? That implies one is trying to be obscure.

    I prefer the term shorthand.
  • wazzyboywazzyboy Posts: 13,346
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    mimi dlc wrote: »
    Codes? That implies one is trying to be obscure.

    I prefer the term shorthand.

    Might not be trying to be obscure but sometimes it might be. I can remember reading stuff in here when I first arrived and not having a clue. :D
  • edy10edy10 Posts: 18,399
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I'm not sure if it is a general consensus, but it does appear that people on the general forum are not so keen on the "fandom" approach to the appreciation threads, especially if constant posting to specific ones push down threads considered "current" or "relevant" to the current series.

    Respect is hard to find on the Internet in any case, so my advice would be, for everybody above or below the line, to tep away from the keyboard if they think about getting over emotional about a dance-based entertainment show.

    Well, well said. I pretty much agree with everything :cool:
  • edy10edy10 Posts: 18,399
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Monkseal wrote: »
    She's going the right way about making friends - being loud and obnoxious, slagging off the cast for not being famous, not having the most obvious ballroom background, and now shagging her way through all the woobie male pros with the most overprotective fanbases.

    I love her.

    I love your sarcasm :D:D:D ; At least that's what I think it is.
  • edy10edy10 Posts: 18,399
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    TerryM22 wrote: »
    Oh wow, a bit to much for me to take in this early.

    :D:D
    You are hilarious Terry :D
  • Alli-FAlli-F Posts: 32,519
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    edy10 wrote: »
    I love your sarcasm :D:D:D ; At least that's what I think it is.



    Nope, he's serious. :eek::D

    Contrary soul our Monkseal. ;)
This discussion has been closed.