Options
[SPOILERS] - Former Doctor reveals info about 50th Anniversary episode
Callum_Brown
Posts: 745 Forum Member
✭✭
SPOILER
Quote from Tom Baker:
"I am in the special. I'm not supposed to tell you that, but I tell you that very willingly and specifically; the BBC told me not to tell anybody but I'm telling you straightaway."
I think that's brilliant! Flying in the face of the bureaucratic 'I'm sworn to secrecy' or 'I can't tell you'.
If they're bringing 4 back, the chances of the other Doctors returning is high too, perhaps in the notorious 'paintings' clue. I'll be really disappointed if we don't see Hurt regenerating into Eccleston at the end.
Quote from Tom Baker:
"I am in the special. I'm not supposed to tell you that, but I tell you that very willingly and specifically; the BBC told me not to tell anybody but I'm telling you straightaway."
I think that's brilliant! Flying in the face of the bureaucratic 'I'm sworn to secrecy' or 'I can't tell you'.
If they're bringing 4 back, the chances of the other Doctors returning is high too, perhaps in the notorious 'paintings' clue. I'll be really disappointed if we don't see Hurt regenerating into Eccleston at the end.
0
Comments
I know Baker had supposedly given the game away in an interview a while back so has it been published now?
Never mind, found it.
If true, I'm disappointed. Let's face it, there's going to be enough going on with 3 Doctors. Let's hope it's only a small part.
There's a moment where Ten says, 'why are we all here?'
But is there a variation of those trailers somewhere where he says, 'why are we all here? Why are all the Doctors here?'
Not that I can recall.
The whole line is "Why are we altogether? Why are we all here?"
It's said with the Three Doctors together so just refers to them I would think.
That last line came from the Big Finish trailer for their multi doctor story.
'Why are we in the altogether?'
Maybe we'll se it in 'The Last Day – exclusive mini episode'. Maybe it is last day of John Hurt?
http://merchandise.thedoctorwhosite.co.uk/doctor-who-50th-anniversary-dvd-pre-order/
Ooh, very shrewd of you! I'd love that to be the case. In terms of Wibbly Wobbly Timey Wimey, can Derek Jacobi's Master sneak a cameo too? If he fought Hurt then surely Tennant would remember in Utopia.
It's available to purchase on iTunes.
And then my girlfriend and I saw the pictures of Tom at Buckingham Palace (or wherever it was) earlier in the week and both immediately said 'he's in it'. I just can't imagine Tom Baker, no fan of the BBC, involving himself in functions like that unless he's actually involved in the television show (ie being employed by the BBC).
But why couldn't he have just been invited to the Palace as he was an old Doctor? Doesn't prove that he's definitely in the 50th... if that was the case then Peter Davison and Catherine Tate would also be in the 50th...
Now you've got me wondering... are they???
Id rather have Tom Baker back in a long role than David Bloody Tennant who only left a few years ago or even some Doctor Moff decided to make up to annoy fandom.
No, it doesn't prove anything, of course not. It just seemed to be something out of character, or out of the ordinary for him to do. I don't think he's been involved in any official publicity events (not counting conventions) for Doctor who for decades, which is what the event essentially was. So that's why we both just kind of thought 'yeah, he's probably in it'. It doesn't necessarily mean the same thing with Davison or Tate because it is more common for both of them to do Who related publicity events. That said, I do think Davison will be in it too.
Well
Davison cause he admitted to having a copy of the script and Tate due to an Interview in a Magazine (never saw the full interview so don't know if she actually said she was in it but the preamble claimed she was).
Maybe none of them (apart from the three confirmed) are in it...
Maybe it's old footage...
Maybe it's CGI...
Does that cover everything?
Oh, you're being a spoilsport now!!
What would we do here all day if we couldn't speculate wildly?