Surgeon whistle blower finally reveals truth about health tourism

timetosaygoodbytimetosaygoodby Posts: 2,063
Forum Member
✭✭✭
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2303644/Epidemic-health-tourists-costs-billions-Thousands-fly-UK-treatment-leave-paying--NHS-powerless-act.html

-leading surgeon said the cash-strapped Health Service is becoming the ‘world’s maternity wing’ as expectant mothers arrive just to give birth.

-Thousands of others are flying here for cancer, HIV, kidney and infertility treatment – and then leaving without paying, according to cancer specialist J Meirion Thomas.

is it time to only allow British citizens to use the NHS
«1

Comments

  • WhiteFangWhiteFang Posts: 3,970
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2303644/Epidemic-health-tourists-costs-billions-Thousands-fly-UK-treatment-leave-paying--NHS-powerless-act.html

    -leading surgeon said the cash-strapped Health Service is becoming the ‘world’s maternity wing’ as expectant mothers arrive just to give birth.

    -Thousands of others are flying here for cancer, HIV, kidney and infertility treatment – and then leaving without paying, according to cancer specialist J Meirion Thomas.

    is it time to only allow British citizens to use the NHS

    Unless they pay up front.
    How can this be happening and what are the authorities doing letting billions be squandered on these opportunists who shouldnt be allowed in to the UK in the first place. This is as much a UK border problem as health and it needs someone like UKIP to sort it out.If they say no treatment unless cash is paid there wouldnt be a problem.But sort the borders out and dont let them fly in to misuse our health services.
    Im sure UKIP could do better
  • WhiteFangWhiteFang Posts: 3,970
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Just thought of another point.This was the front page story in the Dail Mail today, but is there any resolve or political will in government to deal with this problem. Or are they too busy handing out so much cash to the rest of the world and the EU :rolleyes: that a bit of health tourism is small change
  • geordiejackiegeordiejackie Posts: 3,400
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I wonder how long Professor J Meirion Thomas will remain in his job now ? But well done sir we need more people like you



    jack
  • redhatmattredhatmatt Posts: 5,197
    Forum Member
    Compulsory health insurance for all travellers entering the UK is required.
  • jzeejzee Posts: 25,498
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Apparently the problem is hospitals are reluctant to register the treatment of non entitled people correctly as this means they then have to pursue a claim from that person, or their goverrnment presumably. It's easier to just say they are entitled (so the UK government pays), so that's what they do.
  • BrokenArrowBrokenArrow Posts: 21,665
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I have seen this first hand, from an Australian tourist in my local GP's surgery.

    In this case she was trying to tell the secretary that she had insurance to pay for the treatment, but they wasn't interested in accepting it, probably because it was too much hassle to process an insurance claim.
  • Nick1966Nick1966 Posts: 15,742
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    -leading surgeon said the cash-strapped Health Service is

    The Daily Mail added the phrase 'cash-strapped'. They chose not to say "...leading surgeon said Health service is...".

    Sounds like the Daily Mail have an axe to grind rather than news to explain. So this Daily Mail article can be safely ignored.
  • timetosaygoodbytimetosaygoodby Posts: 2,063
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nick1966 wrote: »
    The Daily Mail added the phrase 'cash-strapped'. They chose not to say "...leading surgeon said Health service is...".

    Sounds like the Daily Mail have an axe to grind rather than news to explain. So this Daily Mail article can be safely ignored.

    except that was actually a fact because the NHS is under so much strain and are cash strapped because the money from the government is not enough to cover all the people (because of health tourism and immigration) and waiting times are increasing
  • Nick1966Nick1966 Posts: 15,742
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    ...the NHS is ...cash strapped ...because and immigration...

    Which is why the Daily Mail's coverage can be ignored. The Daily Mail have an axe to grind and want their readers to reach a certain conclusion rather than be informed of a news item.
  • timetosaygoodbytimetosaygoodby Posts: 2,063
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nick1966 wrote: »
    Which is why the Daily Mail's coverage can be ignored. The Daily Mail have an axe to grind and what their readers to reach a certain conclusion rather than be informed of a news item.

    its people like you who have ruined the country, you simply can accept immigration and in this case health tourism is destroying the NHS and the country at large

    why exactly should immigrants or health tourists be allowed to use the nhs for free when they contribute nothing and British people have to put up with longer waiting times, poorer care, less resources and a larger national debt because of it

    what are the advantages of health tourism Nick i'm waiting for some reasons
  • Rastus PiefaceRastus Pieface Posts: 4,382
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nick1966 wrote: »
    Which is why the Daily Mail's coverage can be ignored. The Daily Mail have an axe to grind and want their readers to reach a certain conclusion rather than be informed of a news item.

    but can the cancer specialist J Meirion Thomas' comments be ignored?

    or is this just another case of shooting the messenger, whilst ignoring the message?
  • timetosaygoodbytimetosaygoodby Posts: 2,063
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    but can the cancer specialist J Meirion Thomas' comments be ignored?

    or is this just another case of shooting the messenger, whilst ignoring the message?

    according to the left mass immigration is going to lead to a multicultural socialist paradise and money grows on trees and we have so many resources everyone from around the world should have immediate access to them for free
  • Nick1966Nick1966 Posts: 15,742
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    its people like you who have ruined the country,

    Blimey. I'm flattered.
    you simply can accept immigration and in this case health tourism is destroying the NHS and the country at large
    .

    Depends what you mean by 'destroy'
    why exactly should immigrants or health tourists be allowed to use the nhs for free

    Because medical professions around the World have a duty of care. Wherever you are in the world, if you have an accident you might be able to reasonably expect medical treatment with the medical team worrying about billing you later.
    when they contribute nothing

    we could be drifting towards amercian style health care. Medical attention should be given on need, not ability to pay.
    and British people have to put up with longer waiting times, poorer care, less resources and a larger national debt because of it


    Overblown poppycock.

    Exactly how have overseas people receving NHS care contributed to
    • record UK personal debt
    • the 75% rise (cash terms) in the annual basic state pension welfare since 2000
    what are the advantages of health tourism Nick i'm waiting for some reasons

    I am not going to blame the country's current economic fortures on 'health tourism'. Whatever the means and whatever the extent of this is.
  • Nick1966Nick1966 Posts: 15,742
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    but can the cancer specialist J Meirion Thomas' comments be ignored?

    No.
    or is this just another case of shooting the messenger, whilst ignoring the message?

    Yes.
  • thenetworkbabethenetworkbabe Posts: 45,624
    Forum Member
    WhiteFang wrote: »
    Unless they pay up front.
    How can this be happening and what are the authorities doing letting billions be squandered on these opportunists who shouldnt be allowed in to the UK in the first place. This is as much a UK border problem as health and it needs someone like UKIP to sort it out.If they say no treatment unless cash is paid there wouldnt be a problem.But sort the borders out and dont let them fly in to misuse our health services.
    Im sure UKIP could do better

    The medical profession have a duty to treat acute emergencies. You can't send people in A and E at risk away because they have no money - its just not moral. Its probably not practical either - even the US doesn't wait for you to be well enough to sign a cheque before it treats you. It may or it may not be necessary, or cost-effective to chase the cost up later. It might be possible to make everyone entering the UK carry medical insurance, or to make EU countries fork out for their nationals..

    The distinction is with people who turn up with non urgent conditions - who hospitals in my experience do send away anyway.

    People turning up about to give birth is an obvious way to exploit the need to cover acute need - but I doubt if its at all significant on any meaningful scale.
  • Rastus PiefaceRastus Pieface Posts: 4,382
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nick1966 wrote: »
    No.

    would you care to comment on his words then?
  • Nick1966Nick1966 Posts: 15,742
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    would you care to comment on his words then?

    Not at the moment. I do not comment on the words of those whose stories have come to me via the Daily Mail.

    Nevertheless, I am prepared to comment on the quality of Daily Mail's journalism.
  • timetosaygoodbytimetosaygoodby Posts: 2,063
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nick1966 wrote: »
    Not at the moment. I do not comment on the words of those whose stories have come to me via the Daily Mail.

    Nevertheless, I am prepared to comment on the quality of Daily Mail's journalism.

    Once again Nick still has not explained the benefits of health tourism to the UK and British people, haven't got any ideas what a shock
  • Nick1966Nick1966 Posts: 15,742
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Once again Nick still has not explained the benefits of health tourism

    What is health tourism ?

    And to whom are we ascribing any benefits ?
  • timetosaygoodbytimetosaygoodby Posts: 2,063
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nick1966 wrote: »
    What is health tourism ?

    And to whom are we ascribing any benefits ?

    its so good you have got involved in this discussion and you do not even know what health tourism is considering it is the focus of the entire thread more informed debate from the left
  • LyricalisLyricalis Posts: 57,958
    Forum Member
    its so good you have got involved in this discussion and you do not even know what health tourism is considering it is the focus of the entire thread more informed debate from the left

    Rather than launching personal attacks on people, why don't you suggest a solution that:
    1. Doesn't risk the lives of people needing treatment.
    2. Doesn't end up costing more than the problem does.
    The first thing to do is work out how to actually gauge the size of the problem. No one seems to know at the moment how much this is costing and what the other impacts are.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nick1966 wrote: »
    What is health tourism ?

    And to whom are we ascribing any benefits ?

    One from the Guardian

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/the-northerner/2012/aug/23/health-tourist-nigeria-manchester
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 3,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Lyricalis wrote: »
    Rather than launching personal attacks on people, why don't you suggest a solution that:
    1. Doesn't risk the lives of people needing treatment.
    2. Doesn't end up costing more than the problem does.
    The first thing to do is work out how to actually gauge the size of the problem. No one seems to know at the moment how much this is costing and what the other impacts are.

    The Professor estimates billions of pounds per year, which sounds right to me.

    The cost of dialysis is ten of thousands of pounds per year, including support services that go with it. If a migrant is sick and has chosen to fly thousands of miles to get holed in a NHS hospital and not pay pay claiming they haven't got any money or threatening said NHS hospital with legal action then that's money straight out of the NHS budget. Now multiply it many times and you'll quickly realise how expensive things become for the NHS.
  • WhiteFangWhiteFang Posts: 3,970
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The medical profession have a duty to treat acute emergencies. You can't send people in A and E at risk away because they have no money - its just not moral. Its probably not practical either - even the US doesn't wait for you to be well enough to sign a cheque before it treats you. It may or it may not be necessary, or cost-effective to chase the cost up later. It might be possible to make everyone entering the UK carry medical insurance, or to make EU countries fork out for their nationals..

    The distinction is with people who turn up with non urgent conditions - who hospitals in my experience do send away anyway.

    People turning up about to give birth is an obvious way to exploit the need to cover acute need - but I doubt if its at all significant on any meaningful scale.

    Good idea.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 704
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Nick1966 wrote: »
    Which is why the Daily Mail's coverage can be ignored. The Daily Mail have an axe to grind and want their readers to reach a certain conclusion rather than be informed of a news item.

    Agree another scare mongering selective story from the Daily Mail, the guest on SKY News this morning (who are normally quite Right Wing) said that she has 2 nurse sisters and brother who is a Doctor and they have never/rarely come across this or words to that affect.
Sign In or Register to comment.