Options

New YouTube layout.

2

Comments

  • Options
    xp95xp95 Posts: 2,439
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Probably to try & stop the trolls posting, whether it will stop them is another thing.
    The trolls could easily make up a "real name", so its hardly going to stop or deter them is it? :rolleyes:
  • Options
    tghe-retfordtghe-retford Posts: 26,449
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Is it all gonna be paywall, or just modern crap? Because I tend to find I don't watch anything more recent than 1995.... :D
    Not all of it, unless Google finds YouTube is hemorrhaging money. Uploaders will be able to choose if they place their content behind a paywall and for how much they'll charge. I suspect the neutralising of comments on YT is a way to ensure no controversial or critical comments against content providers who'll be funding YT.
  • Options
    tghe-retfordtghe-retford Posts: 26,449
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    xp95 wrote: »
    The trolls could easily make up a "real name", so its hardly going to stop or deter them is it? :rolleyes:
    I suspect it'll make it easier to continually ban someone to deter them from commenting and that the hope is by using a real name, they'll make people less comfortable to make nasty comments under a pseudonym.

    Facebook is very strict when it comes to banning, usually to competition entrants like myself, I am now permabanned from FB.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 5,692
    Forum Member
    Dr. Claw wrote: »
    lol well it aint working

    That just made me lol. Numerous raids as a US Navy Seal and yet can't spell the name of their enemy, nor their specialism properly. Seems legit.

    The top record in US military history is 160 kills out of a claimed 255, notched up by the late Chris Kyle. I wish these little keyboard warriors could at least do a bit of research beforehand.

    Plus, what more can be traced from an IP address? Mine claims I'm in Leeds despite being far far more South than that.
  • Options
    xp95xp95 Posts: 2,439
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I suspect it'll make it easier to continually ban someone to deter them from commenting and that the hope is by using a real name, they'll make people less comfortable to make nasty comments under a pseudonym.

    Facebook is very strict when it comes to banning, usually to competition entrants like myself, I am now permabanned from FB.
    Are you permabanned by your IP address? If not, why not just create another Facebook account? :confused:
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 32,379
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    xp95 wrote: »
    I only lost one of my subscribers. :o

    All mine are still there:confused:
  • Options
    NX-74205NX-74205 Posts: 4,691
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Facebook is very strict when it comes to banning, usually to competition entrants like myself, I am now permabanned from FB.

    Come on then, spill the beans. How does one go about getting themselves permabanned from Facebook?
  • Options
    xp95xp95 Posts: 2,439
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    woodbush wrote: »
    All mine are still there:confused:
    Come to think of it, they may have simply either unsubscribed to me or shut down their account, (possibly down to the frustration of the changes on YouTube). :o
  • Options
    tghe-retfordtghe-retford Posts: 26,449
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    xp95 wrote: »
    Are you permabanned by your IP address? If not, why not just create another Facebook account? :confused:
    I think they use multiple means beyond an IP address to detect previously banned users, some people changed IP addresses when Facebook targeted people entering competitions on their site and loads of people got bans, changed IP addresses and got repeatedly banned under their new account. And quite frankly, after the way they treated me, I wouldn't want anything to do with that website again.
    NX-74205 wrote: »
    Come on then, spill the beans. How does one go about getting themselves permabanned from Facebook?
    Enter competitions. That's all you need to do. A fair few people got warnings, 30 day bans or even permabans for doing that earlier this year.
  • Options
    degsyhufcdegsyhufc Posts: 59,251
    Forum Member
    The worst change for me could be rectified by one tiny little setting. Annotations off by default!
  • Options
    xp95xp95 Posts: 2,439
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I think they use multiple means beyond an IP address to detect previously banned users, some people changed IP addresses when Facebook targeted people entering competitions on their site and loads of people got bans, changed IP addresses and got repeatedly banned under their new account. And quite frankly, after the way they treated me, I wouldn't want anything to do with that website again.

    Enter competitions. That's all you need to do. A fair few people got warnings, 30 day bans or even permabans for doing that earlier this year.
    What's wrong with entering competitions? :confused:
  • Options
    tghe-retfordtghe-retford Posts: 26,449
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    xp95 wrote: »
    What's wrong with entering competitions? :confused:
    No idea, but Facebook banned tons of people for entering them. They never explained their rationale beyond a generic infringement of community rules message those banned got.

    But coming back to Google, I suspect getting a grip on the whole trolling within posts as Facebook affords themselves with the example I gave above is one of the reasons why they have made this move. Could also be to shore up comments before the paywall goes up and to get more people recruited to Google+ which had been seen as a joke by many.
  • Options
    EStaffs90EStaffs90 Posts: 13,722
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Bio Max wrote: »
    Shame you have to use your real name to comment now - won't be happening for me.

    No, you don't - I just made a comment on a video with my username. And the only connection between that and my actual name is that they begin with "E".
  • Options
    Bio MaxBio Max Posts: 2,207
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    EStaffs90 wrote: »
    No, you don't - I just made a comment on a video with my username. And the only connection between that and my actual name is that they begin with "E".

    http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/want-comment-youtube-videos-now-you-need-google-8C11556258
  • Options
    xp95xp95 Posts: 2,439
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    No idea, but Facebook banned tons of people for entering them. They never explained their rationale beyond a generic infringement of community rules message those banned got.

    But coming back to Google, I suspect getting a grip on the whole trolling within posts as Facebook affords themselves with the example I gave above is one of the reasons why they have made this move. Could also be to shore up comments before the paywall goes up and to get more people recruited to Google+ which had been seen as a joke by many.
    I entered a competition on Facebook last year, btw! :eek:
  • Options
    Alien_SaxonAlien_Saxon Posts: 1,178
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Looks like the "reply" function has returned,

    REJOICE!
  • Options
    pericompericom Posts: 6,026
    Forum Member
    Hate the changes Google have introduced on Youtube. I hardly uses it anymore.
  • Options
    StrmChaserSteveStrmChaserSteve Posts: 2,728
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    This video here

    Warning - this video contains ascii penis alert

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGPr0RLWv9U

    Kinda hilarious, but brillant way to demonstrate what a dumb change this was

    Also, another video by Steve Benway

    Raises some important points

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_R9Or5KdkM

    Whoops, i found another one

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3cgvzkmOwo
  • Options
    SuperAPJSuperAPJ Posts: 10,402
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Oh, I saw that expletive-filled rant quoted further up the thread posted on someone's Twitter account and thought it was just them being weird!
  • Options
    PencilBreathPencilBreath Posts: 3,643
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    This video here

    Warning - this video contains ascii penis alert

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGPr0RLWv9U

    Kinda hilarious, but brillant way to demonstrate what a dumb change this was

    Also, another video by Steve Benway

    Raises some important points

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_R9Or5KdkM

    Whoops, i found another one

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3cgvzkmOwo

    steve's a bit of a **** tbh.
  • Options
    SambdaSambda Posts: 6,210
    Forum Member
    xp95 wrote: »
    The trolls could easily make up a "real name", so its hardly going to stop or deter them is it? :rolleyes:

    From what I can see, a truly independent Youtube ID doesn't exist. All logins have been Google *email* (i.e. Google old-style) accounts (as opposed to Google+) for a few years now. However, you can choose to have your Youtube nickname/handle displayed in Youtube as opposed to whatever name you have under Google emails settings (Youtube refer to the latter as your "real name" although it needn't be, of course - it can be changed whenever you want in Google's settings page). Presumably the separate Youtube nickname/handle is not available to new Youtube subscribers, but only to people who had accounts there before Google came in? So all this cack on Youtube about using your "real name" seems to simply mean using whatever name you have under Gmail settings? It's not a verified real name at all... so I am not quite sure where all this is getting them in busting anonymity.

    Then on top of all that, there is linking to Google+ which is another step entirely.
  • Options
    StrmChaserSteveStrmChaserSteve Posts: 2,728
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    New update by Steve Benway - youtube comment system

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YffdONX-bs0
  • Options
    zx50zx50 Posts: 91,271
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sambda wrote: »
    From what I can see, a truly independent Youtube ID doesn't exist. All logins have been Google *email* (i.e. Google old-style) accounts (as opposed to Google+) for a few years now. However, you can choose to have your Youtube nickname/handle displayed in Youtube as opposed to whatever name you have under Google emails settings (Youtube refer to the latter as your "real name" although it needn't be, of course - it can be changed whenever you want in Google's settings page). Presumably the separate Youtube nickname/handle is not available to new Youtube subscribers, but only to people who had accounts there before Google came in? So all this cack on Youtube about using your "real name" seems to simply mean using whatever name you have under Gmail settings? It's not a verified real name at all... so I am not quite sure where all this is getting them in busting anonymity.

    Then on top of all that, there is linking to Google+ which is another step entirely.

    I don't think it will, seeing as though the site is completely unmoderated. Although, the uploader can remove comments if they're too offensive towards the uploader. I doubt the uploader's going to trawl through the comments on his/her videos looking for offensive comments towards other posters. Besides, there must be a truckful load of comments under most of the videos. I doubt any of the Google staff will trawl through them looking for anything offensive. The whole change is just pointless and stupid.
  • Options
    SambdaSambda Posts: 6,210
    Forum Member
    zx50 wrote: »
    I don't think it will, seeing as though the site is completely unmoderated. Although, the uploader can remove comments if they're too offensive towards the uploader. I doubt the uploader's going to trawl through the comments on his/her videos looking for offensive comments towards other posters. Besides, there must be a truckful load of comments under most of the videos. I doubt any of the Google staff will trawl through them looking for anything offensive. The whole change is just pointless and stupid.

    I think they're idea is "make them post under their real names and they won't be so cocky". But, like I said, I can't see how these recent changes, and their odd insistence that your Google "name" is your real name, is achieving that.

    (That's providing I've understood how it all works correctly. It's even more complicated for me as I have Google Apps too (a sort of MS Exchange Server on the cheap) and the damn thing keeps pushing to link up with that, too!)
  • Options
    zx50zx50 Posts: 91,271
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yet again, this morning, I can't leave any comments because that daft pop-up won't show me what's on the second step. Just blank white.
Sign In or Register to comment.