Options

UK manufacturing rises in February as employment surges

paulschapmanpaulschapman Posts: 35,536
Forum Member
UK manufacturing grew faster than expected in February, with employment in the sector expanding at its fastest pace in almost three years.

The Markit/CIPS Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) ticked up to 56.9 from 56.6 in January, higher than the 56.5 expected by economists
.
.
.
It is the eleventh consecutive month that UK manufacturing has expanded.

Jobs growth in the sector rose at its fastest rate since May 2011.

More good news.

Comments

  • Options
    davzerdavzer Posts: 2,501
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It is.

    I'm surmising that there is a greater wealth distribution around the country due to manufacturing in comparison to financial serices.
  • Options
    mRebelmRebel Posts: 24,882
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    More good news.

    Indeed, until the next banking crisis screws it up again. And worth remembering that the billions banks have been forced to shell out in compensation will be responsible for a good chunk of the upturn, as Martin Lewis noted.
  • Options
    trunkstertrunkster Posts: 14,468
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    More good news.

    Boo! "part time jobs" "zero hours contracts" blah blah blah
  • Options
    wallsterwallster Posts: 17,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Look, posting yet another good news story is going to spoil many people's day here. Have a heart! :D
  • Options
    AnnsyreAnnsyre Posts: 109,504
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    More good news.

    Excellent news and more to come I hope.:)
  • Options
    exlordlucanexlordlucan Posts: 35,375
    Forum Member
    Does the manufacturing of unemployment figures now count?
  • Options
    tim59tim59 Posts: 47,188
    Forum Member
    trunkster wrote: »
    Boo! "part time jobs" "zero hours contracts" blah blah blah

    Better read this then from the ONS http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-camerons-government-caused-full-time-3197874. Some 646,000 youngsters live in homes where one or both parents are only working part-time – up from 443,000 in 2010 when David Cameron became Prime Minister.

    The figures from the Office for National Statistics will embarrass the Government, which launched a child poverty strategy last week.
  • Options
    David TeeDavid Tee Posts: 22,833
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    tim59 wrote: »
    Better read this then from the ONS http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/david-camerons-government-caused-full-time-3197874. Some 646,000 youngsters live in homes where one or both parents are only working part-time – up from 443,000 in 2010 when David Cameron became Prime Minister.

    The figures from the Office for National Statistics will embarrass the Government, which launched a child poverty strategy last week.

    :D How to play with statistics.

    What the Mirror isn't reporting is that the number of children in workless households (i.e. where no parent is working at all) has fallen by 273,000 since May 2010.

    So what we have is that 203,000 of those 273,000 have parents that are now working part-time. Given that they're parents (and many of them are single parents bringing up children) - that's only to be expected.

    Typical Mirror nonsense.
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    trunkster wrote: »
    Boo! "part time jobs" "zero hours contracts" blah blah blah

    I'm glad you find it funny, it's not for the poor b******s stuck on them.
  • Options
    David TeeDavid Tee Posts: 22,833
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jol44 wrote: »
    I'm glad you find it funny, it's not for the poor b******s stuck on them.

    Oh God. You're not still banging this drum are you?
    Zero-hours workers, when compared to the average UK employee, are just as satisfied with their job (60% versus 59%), happier with their work-life balance (65% vs 58%), and less likely to think they are treated unfairly by their organisation (27% vs 29%).

    Zero-hours workers are, on average, nearly twice as likely to be satisfied with having no minimum set contracted hours, as they are to be dissatisfied. Almost half (47%) say they are satisfied compared with around a quarter (27%) who report being dissatisfied. The most common explanation for this is that flexible working suits their current circumstances (44% of those saying they are satisfied or very satisfied with having no minimum set contracted hours).

    More than half (52%) of zero-hours workers say they would not like to work more hours than they do in a typical week, although just over a third (38%) say they would like more hours.

    Eight out of ten (80%) zero-hours staff say they are never penalised for not being available for work.
  • Options
    wallsterwallster Posts: 17,609
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    This thread seems to be a Left-free zone. Wonder why? :D
Sign In or Register to comment.