Peter Andre (part 3)

15455575960122

Comments

  • JerrybobJerrybob Posts: 1,685
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Elle_James wrote: »
    The latest thinking from paediatricians - which Emily's mum is - is that babies shouldn't wear shoes at all, as they have no bones in their feet, just cartilage.

    Why on earth would anyone use a buggy to "cart" their baby a few feet from a car, up and down steps, into a building?

    Indeed. But still Emily can't do right for doing wrong *sigh*
  • Elle_JamesElle_James Posts: 855
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Watching the show yesterday, Gino made it very plain several times that he and his family were close friends with Peter and Emily.

    The spite and name calling of a young woman who is bringing up her child with her fiancé in the way that they think best, is quite unnecessary.

    As for "staged photo ops"' paps are outside the ITV studios all the time, and Emily certainly doesn't seem happy about that.
  • HmmbopHmmbop Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    scone wrote: »
    I have been lucky, I have seen hide nor hair of Andre for quite a while now, he's not been on the cover of magazines that I know of or on my TV anywhere when I watch it, so I am amazed that there is still something to talk about regarding this man

    He was on the cover of OK! (Makes it 5 times this year, I think) at the end of June. Some complete z lister from TOWIE has been on the last week or two, I think, with her new baby. But I'm sure we can expect another cover from TM pretty soon.

    He still dies that infantile column in that magazine, and still invades his kids privacy regularly by posting regular 'news' on his ego channel, too.

    So, he's defo the gift that keeps giving.:D

    Also scone, just to keep you up to speed, TM and private natural Embolism celebrated their 'two year anniversary' just recently. And as a 'belated', for whatever reason, ;-) anniversary gift, TM bought his fiancée an 'eternity' ring, which he very kindly tweeted a pic. Interesting timing, too!;-)
  • HmmbopHmmbop Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jerrybob wrote: »
    Emily practices attachment parenting so it stands to reason she would want to keep her baby close (sorry, have just realised logic has no place here lol) ;-)

    AP? Does she? First I've heard of that! Can't believe TM kept THAT quiet!! ;-)And logic depends on your own personal opinion and point of view. And I'd prefer if you wouldn't insinuate about my personal views on logic and thinking, thanks!
    Jerrybob wrote: »
    Indeed. But still Emily can't do right for doing wrong *sigh*

    Nobody is saying she is doing anything wrong, just that she is playing the game re: pap pictures.
    Elle_James wrote: »
    Watching the show yesterday, Gino made it very plain several times that he and his family were close friends with Peter and Emily.

    The spite and name calling of a young woman who is bringing up her child with her fiancé in the way that they think best, is quite unnecessary.

    As for "staged photo ops"' paps are outside the ITV studios all the time, and Emily certainly doesn't seem happy about that.

    Spite and name calling? Where? Natural, private and embolism are all names used by TM himself to describe his fiancé, no?:confused:

    Not happy my ass. It would all have ben prearranged. Any it's very naive to believe otherwise.
  • JerrybobJerrybob Posts: 1,685
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Elle_James wrote: »
    Watching the show yesterday, Gino made it very plain several times that he and his family were close friends with Peter and Emily.

    The spite and name calling of a young woman who is bringing up her child with her fiancé in the way that they think best, is quite unnecessary.

    As for "staged photo ops"' paps are outside the ITV studios all the time, and Emily certainly doesn't seem happy about that.

    Seems her only "crime" is falling in love with someone who seems to be the subject of constant ridicule. Guilty by association and all that. >:(
  • JerrybobJerrybob Posts: 1,685
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Hmmbop wrote: »
    AP? Does she? First I've heard of that! Can't believe TM kept THAT quiet!! ;-)And logic depends on your own personal opinion and point of view. And I'd prefer if you wouldn't insinuate about my personal views on logic and thinking, thanks!



    Nobody is saying she is doing anything wrong, just that she is playing the game re: pap pictures.



    Spite and name calling? Where? Natural, private and embolism are all names used by TM himself to describe his fiancé, no?:confused:

    Not happy my ass. It would all have ben prearranged. Any it's very naive to believe otherwise.

    I think you are the naive one. I have worked in the newspaper industry for 15 years. Journalists check the guest lists of current TV shows on a daily basis and are sent out to snap the newsworthy ones arriving and leaving the studios ;-)
  • HmmbopHmmbop Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jerrybob wrote: »
    I think you are the naive one. I have worked in the newspaper industry for 15 years. Journalists check the guest lists of current TV shows on a daily basis and are sent out to snap the newsworthy ones arriving and leaving the studios ;-)


    Uh-huh. And Kate Moss is my BFF:)

    And how do you know that I don't work in the magazine/newspaper industry?;-)
  • sconescone Posts: 14,850
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Hmmbop wrote: »
    He was on the cover of OK! (Makes it 5 times this year, I think) at the end of June. Some complete z lister from TOWIE has been on the last week or two, I think, with her new baby. But I'm sure we can expect another cover from TM pretty soon.

    He still dies that infantile column in that magazine, and still invades his kids privacy regularly by posting regular 'news' on his ego channel, too.

    So, he's defo the gift that keeps giving.:D

    Also scone, just to keep you up to speed, TM and private natural Embolism celebrated their 'two year anniversary' just recently. And as a 'belated', for whatever reason, ;-)anniversary gift, TM bought his fiancée an eternity ring, which he very kindly tweeted a pic of. Interesting timing, too!;-)

    Hahaha thanks for the update
  • Ella71110Ella71110 Posts: 4,239
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jerrybob wrote: »
    I think you are the naive one. I have worked in the newspaper industry for 15 years. Journalists check the guest lists of current TV shows on a daily basis and are sent out to snap the newsworthy ones arriving and leaving the studios ;-)

    Sorry but I had to laugh :D
  • Ella71110Ella71110 Posts: 4,239
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Blondie X wrote: »
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2705891/Doting-father-Peter-Andre-heads-fianc-e-Emily-MacDonagh-six-month-old-baby-Amelia.html

    Why does the media fawn all over the cheesy buffoon? That article sounds like it was written by Mills and Boon

    *Hey, just realised I might have just written a TM standard song in my post :D

    Awful cringy journalism isn't it? Although Amelia is very cute,

    I do laugh at the media still describing TM as the Mysterious girl singer :D
  • BelaBela Posts: 2,568
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jerrybob wrote: »
    I think you are the naive one. I have worked in the newspaper industry for 15 years. Journalists check the guest lists of current TV shows on a daily basis and are sent out to snap the newsworthy ones arriving and leaving the studios ;-)

    :D So why would they take pics of Peter Andre? What's newsworthy about him?
  • Elle_JamesElle_James Posts: 855
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Jerrybob wrote: »
    I think you are the naive one. I have worked in the newspaper industry for 15 years. Journalists check the guest lists of current TV shows on a daily basis and are sent out to snap the newsworthy ones arriving and leaving the studios ;-)


    Ella71110
    Sorry but I had to laughQUOTE.

    Why? That is how things work.. Can't see the joke myself. Perhaps you could share.
  • artlesschaosartlesschaos Posts: 11,345
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Elle_James wrote: »
    Watching the show yesterday, Gino made it very plain several times that he and his family were close friends with Peter and Emily.

    The spite and name calling of a young woman who is bringing up her child with her fiancé in the way that they think best, is quite unnecessary.

    As for "staged photo ops"' paps are outside the ITV studios all the time, and Emily certainly doesn't seem happy about that.

    Perhaps she should stop being involved in selling her family then - because that is a very simple way to protect your children as very many other stars and celebs know.

    If you put your private life up for sale, it stops being private - funny that.
  • HmmbopHmmbop Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Elle_James wrote: »
    Ella71110
    Sorry but I had to laughQUOTE.

    Why? That is how things work.. Can't see the joke myself. Perhaps you could share.


    Let me have a bash at sharing.

    It's funny because anyone online can proclaim to be anything, work anywhere etc etc. And it's also funny because JB just thinks we'll all accept it as the gospel truth.

    Do you get it now?
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,341
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Elle_James wrote: »
    Ella71110
    Sorry but I had to laughQUOTE.

    Why? That is how things work.. Can't see the joke myself. Perhaps you could share.

    Think I'm speaking to the right person as the constant messing up of quotes is confusing. Been having a catch up and really have to ask, have you ever made a post that isn't looking down your nose at anyone who doesn't agree with you?
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,341
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Hmmbop wrote: »
    He was on the cover of OK! (Makes it 5 times this year, I think) at the end of June. Some complete z lister from TOWIE has been on the last week or two, I think, with her new baby. But I'm sure we can expect another cover from TM pretty soon.

    He still dies that infantile column in that magazine, and still invades his kids privacy regularly by posting regular 'news' on his ego channel, too.

    So, he's defo the gift that keeps giving.:D

    Also scone, just to keep you up to speed, TM and private natural Embolism celebrated their 'two year anniversary' just recently. And as a 'belated', for whatever reason, ;-) anniversary gift, TM bought his fiancée an 'eternity' ring, which he very kindly tweeted a pic. Interesting timing, too!;-)

    So same shit, different year really?
  • Elle_JamesElle_James Posts: 855
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Hmmbop wrote: »
    Let me have a bash at sharing.

    It's funny because anyone online can proclaim to be anything, work anywhere etc etc. And it's also funny because JB just thinks we'll all accept it as the gospel truth.

    Do you understand now?

    My question wasn't to you, but don't let that stop you from jumping in. Why the constant aggression? Perhaps you should also take your own advice about insinuating.

    Anyway, have a good day.
  • HmmbopHmmbop Posts: 2,099
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Elle_James wrote: »
    My question wasn't to you, but don't let that stop you from jumping in. Why the constant aggression? Perhaps you should also take your own advice about insinuating.

    Anyway, have a good day.


    Your question doesn't have to be directed at me, it's a public forum and if I feel like replying, then I absolutely will do so. If you wanted an answer from a specific poster only, you should have PM'd them. And what have I insinuated about you?

    And I cant really take your comment about my apparent constant aggression too seriously. Do you remember your very first post on this thread? I think it ended up being removed by the mods. Like many other hundreds of your posts. So, I think you set the tone for our conversing from that minute onwards. Have a look at the style of your own posts and you'll maybe then understand why you get the replies you do. And not just from me.

    Yeah, you have a good day, too.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,341
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Angel Dust wrote: »
    Think I'm speaking to the right person as the constant messing up of quotes is confusing. Been having a catch up and really have to ask, have you ever made a post that isn't looking down your nose at anyone who doesn't agree with you?

    I'll take that as a No then :D
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 245
    Forum Member
    Jerrybob wrote: »
    I think you are the naive one. I have worked in the newspaper industry for 15 years. Journalists check the guest lists of current TV shows on a daily basis and are sent out to snap the newsworthy ones arriving and leaving the studios ;-)

    This is how it works with events/launches too. The guest lists are released to the agencies. It's good publicity for the event/product and the celeb and money for the paps.

    I don't know who else was on the show that day but the paps may have been there to photograph someone more famous and just snapped Pete hoping to make a few extra quid.
  • Azura's StarAzura's Star Posts: 3,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Elle_James wrote: »
    Watching the show yesterday, Gino made it very plain several times that he and his family were close friends with Peter and Emily.

    The spite and name calling of a young woman who is bringing up her child with her fiancé in the way that they think best, is quite unnecessary.

    As for "staged photo ops"' paps are outside the ITV studios all the time, and Emily certainly doesn't seem happy about that.


    :D
    You actually think that naturalprivateEmily isn't happy about having her picture taken?
    Would this be the same Emily who appeared in a low rent reality TV series, and on the cover of magazines?
    :D
    If she didn't want her or her baby's pictures to be taken ( remember all the guff about how she wasn't prepared to sell her baby's childhood? ) then she wouldn't have hooked up with a z list media tart like Tangoman.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 245
    Forum Member
    :D
    You actually think that naturalprivateEmily isn't happy about having her picture taken?
    Would this be the same Emily who appeared in a low rent reality TV series, and on the cover of magazines?
    :D
    If she didn't want her or her baby's pictures to be taken ( remember all the guff about how she wasn't prepared to sell her baby's childhood? ) then she wouldn't have hooked up with a z list media tart like Tangoman.

    I'm intrigued by this Tangoman nickname. He looks a perfectly normal colour to me in those latest pictures!
  • Blondie XBlondie X Posts: 28,662
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I'm intrigued by this Tangoman nickname. He looks a perfectly normal colour to me in those latest pictures!

    Goes back to when he was the face of Fake Bake and it's stuck
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 245
    Forum Member
    Blondie X wrote: »
    Goes back to when he was the face of Fake Bake and it's stuck

    I wasn't sure if you were joking so I Googled. He was an *interesting* colour during that period! :-)

    http://www.ok.co.uk/lifestyle/Peter-Andre-recreates-Mysterious-Girl-video-in-new-Fake-Bake-advert
  • NotaTypoNotaTypo Posts: 4,253
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jerrybob wrote: »
    I think you are the naive one. I have worked in the newspaper industry for 15 years. Journalists check the guest lists of current TV shows on a daily basis and are sent out to snap the newsworthy ones arriving and leaving the studios ;-)
    They also must check out of town gardening centres and car parks to see if the private girlfriend of a z-lister might just be around at that exact moment. Or they've been informed in advance by the person or their managment...


    "At FameFlynet we have a PR department that specialises in working directly with celebrities and their agents. We work hand in hand with our clients to achieve maximum press coverage in national newspapers and magazines. Our achievements in this market place are unprecedented compared to other picture agencies.

    We pay agents and Celebrities directly from all sales generated from the pictures we work on]

    http://www.fameflynet.biz/
This discussion has been closed.