Well this is it. I've seen with my own eyes Kim doing sexy moves for a shiny softcore photo shoot. You'd think from that she might be able to come up with something for real sex.
.
She has a robotic, awkward personality. It's exactly what I'd expect from her.
If it were real, then thread might be justified, but the whole sex act was acted and fake. They made sure the thrusts were high enough to be visually noticed, absolutely acted, and he was probably limp and just pretend-bumping her fully clothed groin
Another opinion, great and everything but I suppose nobody would know if it were fake or not unless they were hiding in that cover too. It doesn't really matter how many other people think it or don't think it, does it?
A scientific study revealed people had sex at 180-200 ppm (pumps per minute)
A second study revealed people faun-intercoursing operated at a mere 140-160 ppm, at least 20 ppm less than the real thing.
Scientists concluded this, difference was because passion makes your lover work harder increasing the ppm slightly and as the fakers were "going through the motions" passion was not adequately mimicked in the ppm.
Well with respect to Misty and she may well be right about the acting, in my experience bumping a fully clothed groin can produce quite a solid result.:)
A scientific study revealed people had sex at 180-200 ppm (pumps per minute)
A second study revealed people faun-intercoursing operated at a mere 140-160 ppm, at least 20 ppm less than the real thing.
Scientists concluded this, difference was because passion makes your lover work harder increasing the ppm slightly and as the fakers were "going through the motions" passion was not adequately mimicked in the ppm.
Get your stop watch out and count the ppm
Isn't BB's crazy, the questions we ponder
Makes me wonder how many people are seeing themselves having sex in the third person and visualising how it looks when they make this assessment
A scientific study revealed people had sex at 180-200 ppm (pumps per minute)
A second study revealed people faun-intercoursing operated at a mere 140-160 ppm, at least 20 ppm less than the real thing.
Scientists concluded this, difference was because passion makes your lover work harder increasing the ppm slightly and as the fakers were "going through the motions" passion was not adequately mimicked in the ppm.
Get your stop watch out and count the ppm
Isn't BB's crazy, the questions we ponder
Which is about the same number of BPM as Latin American music. It all makes sense now.
A scientific study revealed people had sex at 180-200 ppm (pumps per minute)
A second study revealed people faun-intercoursing operated at a mere 140-160 ppm, at least 20 ppm less than the real thing.
Scientists concluded this, difference was because passion makes your lover work harder increasing the ppm slightly and as the fakers were "going through the motions" passion was not adequately mimicked in the ppm.
I saw a guy in his pyjamas straddling an immobile woman and making great play of raising his arse three feet in the air for the cameras. They would have lost contact at every thrust.
Totally simulated.
Yack it up, but I mean it, sex has a flow to it. Even crap sex has a flow to it - it sort of starts, and then it sort of doesn't quite work, and then one of the participants bravely suggests it isn't quite happening, and then the other agrees in a relieved fashion, and then some giggling or excuse making may occur.
Sorry folks, BPM aside (did you know that all primates have orgasm spasms of 0.8 second intervals?) - in my not very humble and not very esteemed opinion, this was fake copulation.
Yack it up, but I mean it, sex has a flow to it. Even crap sex has a flow to it - it sort of starts, and then it sort of doesn't quite work, and then one of the participants bravely suggests it isn't quite happening, and then the other agrees in a relieved fashion, and then some giggling or excuse making may occur.
Sorry folks, BPM aside (did you know that all primates have orgasm spasms of 0.8 second intervals?) - in my not very humble and not very esteemed opinion, this was fake copulation.
Sorry, I'm just finding a lot of this very funny, and yes that BPM nonsense might have just sent me over the edge
Yack it up, but I mean it, sex has a flow to it. Even crap sex has a flow to it - it sort of starts, and then it sort of doesn't quite work, and then one of the participants bravely suggests it isn't quite happening, and then the other agrees in a relieved fashion, and then some giggling or excuse making may occur.
Sorry folks, BPM aside (did you know that all primates have orgasm spasms of 0.8 second intervals?) - in my not very humble and not very esteemed opinion, this was fake copulation.
I saw a guy in his pyjamas straddling an immobile woman and making great play of raising his arse three feet in the air for the cameras. They would have lost contact at every thrust.
Totally simulated.
Bang on.
Or off, as the case definitely was.
I'm only surprised people haven't all jumped in to agree.
Yack it up, but I mean it, sex has a flow to it. Even crap sex has a flow to it - it sort of starts, and then it sort of doesn't quite work, and then one of the participants bravely suggests it isn't quite happening, and then the other agrees in a relieved fashion, and then some giggling or excuse making may occur.
Sorry folks, BPM aside (did you know that all primates have orgasm spasms of 0.8 second intervals?) - in my not very humble and not very esteemed opinion, this was fake copulation.
BIB You been reading Masters and Johnson again.
I do actually take your point about changes of position and so forth. Not just down to it not working, but to relieve tired arms, increase connection, avoid cramp or for fun. But honestly there really are some guys who think the name of the game it simply to empty the sack.
And another thing - simulated sex, ergo fake relationship. No one is fooling anyone - they are colluding to dupe the gullible viewer. But people want so much to believe.
And another thing - simulated sex, ergo fake relationship. No one is fooling anyone - they are colluding to dupe the gullible viewer. But people want so much to believe.
For what reason though?
The most common response seemed to be along the lines of:
'Why the hell are we being shown this'
or
'Gross'
I'm not sure when that Americanism (much like 'eww') became the norm, but that's another matter
Haha, u guys are funny. But listen, i was the scientist, and i stand by my findings, and they'l be no talk of observer compensation bias in the surprisingly high ppm stats.
I saw a guy in his pyjamas straddling an immobile woman and making great play of raising his arse three feet in the air for the cameras. They would have lost contact at every thrust.
Totally simulated.
Haha, u guys are funny. But listen, i was the scientist, and i stand by my findings, and they'l be no talk of observer compensation bias in the surprisingly high ppm stats.
How the hell didn't that sex look real?? of course they had sex even if Steven was quick. he was probably that horny with his dick rampant had no other choice but to fire his load fast.
Not much pleasure for them Lady like (if u wanna call her one ) no fondling or hokey pokey or lips on lips is rather shameful when it comes to a man ... very disappointing sex scene..
I saw a guy in his pyjamas straddling an immobile woman and making great play of raising his arse three feet in the air for the cameras. They would have lost contact at every thrust.
Totally simulated.
Three feet?! Exaggeration much. Watch it again if you can bear it. Nothing like 3 feet. 6inches at most
Comments
She has a robotic, awkward personality. It's exactly what I'd expect from her.
Another opinion, great and everything but I suppose nobody would know if it were fake or not unless they were hiding in that cover too. It doesn't really matter how many other people think it or don't think it, does it?
A second study revealed people faun-intercoursing operated at a mere 140-160 ppm, at least 20 ppm less than the real thing.
Scientists concluded this, difference was because passion makes your lover work harder increasing the ppm slightly and as the fakers were "going through the motions" passion was not adequately mimicked in the ppm.
Get your stop watch out and count the ppm
Isn't BB's crazy, the questions we ponder
Well with respect to Misty and she may well be right about the acting, in my experience bumping a fully clothed groin can produce quite a solid result.:)
I am a dancer BTW which is how I know this.
Makes me wonder how many people are seeing themselves having sex in the third person and visualising how it looks when they make this assessment
Which is about the same number of BPM as Latin American music. It all makes sense now.
200 ppm? bloody hell:o I'm glad I am celibate.
Scientists? my ar%^:D
Totally simulated.
Sorry folks, BPM aside (did you know that all primates have orgasm spasms of 0.8 second intervals?) - in my not very humble and not very esteemed opinion, this was fake copulation.
Sorry, I'm just finding a lot of this very funny, and yes that BPM nonsense might have just sent me over the edge
BIB - You are correct. Bogus intercourse.
Or off, as the case definitely was.
I'm only surprised people haven't all jumped in to agree.
(Jumped.)
BIB You been reading Masters and Johnson again.
I do actually take your point about changes of position and so forth. Not just down to it not working, but to relieve tired arms, increase connection, avoid cramp or for fun. But honestly there really are some guys who think the name of the game it simply to empty the sack.
Fake fcuk.
Sham shag.
Hocum cum now.
For what reason though?
The most common response seemed to be along the lines of:
'Why the hell are we being shown this'
or
'Gross'
I'm not sure when that Americanism (much like 'eww') became the norm, but that's another matter
Concocted cocking.
Fraudulent frottage.
Haha, u guys are funny. But listen, i was the scientist, and i stand by my findings, and they'l be no talk of observer compensation bias in the surprisingly high ppm stats.
I aint no Marlicio Silver...thx >:(
You could see under the duvet?
Did you have fun in the experiment?
BB Couple Caught In Phoney Cum Scam
Not much pleasure for them Lady like (if u wanna call her one ) no fondling or hokey pokey or lips on lips is rather shameful when it comes to a man ... very disappointing sex scene..
Three feet?! Exaggeration much. Watch it again if you can bear it. Nothing like 3 feet. 6inches at most
Well, I didn't see him removing his jimjams, ergo he remained thusly garbed.