Why is Mastermind 'television's toughest quiz'?

george.millmangeorge.millman Posts: 8,628
Forum Member
I watch a lot of quiz shows, but something has been bugging me.

Why is it that Mastermind is 'television's toughest quiz'? It is commonly referred to in this way, both by John Humphrys on the show and by the BBC generally in press releases. I agree it is certainly very difficult, but is it really the toughest?

Personally, I think that Only Connect is the toughest quiz on television - the questions rely a lot more on lateral thinking than on just knowing facts, and in the episode when they had the Eggheads on against three OC veterans the Eggheads really weren't as strong as they should have been. University Challenge also has, in my opinion, considerably more difficult questions than Mastermind. I think Pointless is also worth a mention - I wouldn't actually consider it more difficult myself, but I think it's still an argument worth having, given that it requires very obscure knowledge and the prediction of what other people will and won't know.

So why is it that Mastermind is apparently so much more difficult than these other quizzes? I'd be very interested to know what criteria is being used to determine this. I do realise that it is individual, whereas all of the other things I have pointed to are competed in teams - that possibly makes a difference, but then again half of the Mastermind questions are on subjects that the contestants have chosen for themselves anyway.

Does anyone have any thoughts?
«1

Comments

  • klunkklunk Posts: 1,417
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I agree that Mastermind is not actually "television's toughest quiz". University Challenge has harder questions. Only Connect has more interesting questions and is like Ask the Family on steroids. In reality, Only Connect is probably the hardest quiz show that has ever been on British TV.

    Mastermind has always made itself out to be some kind of ultimate duel between the contestant and the question setter. It was the same at its inception in the 1970s, but it has always been a bit of a fraud. It's really nothing more than a harder-than-average quiz show with the gimmick that contestants must bone up on a particular subject.
  • MONIFIETHBOYMONIFIETHBOY Posts: 786
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I believe it used to be the toughest quiz in earlier decades when Magnus Magnusson hosted it. Humphies has dumbed the quiz down with "pally" chat in between rounds. The chair I believe was modelled in the style of a wartime interrogation with a simple question/ answer & all the time the camera zooming in on your peformance.
    See > Mastermind BBC Disastermind TV Hell 1992. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGZxcZtkwqw especially the segment starting at 2:28
  • Daniel_GleeballDaniel_Gleeball Posts: 629
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I was about to reply but both previous posts have taken the words out of my mouth. I think only connect is a lot harder. In general knowledge section confidant over the course of the evening of getting 9or 10. Would not get more than 5 right in a whole series on only connect.

    I think originally mastermind was the toughest but it's been over taken. need to come up with a more realistic catch phrase.
  • george.millmangeorge.millman Posts: 8,628
    Forum Member
    I believe it used to be the toughest quiz in earlier decades when Magnus Magnusson hosted it. Humphies has dumbed the quiz down with "pally" chat in between rounds. The chair I believe was modelled in the style of a wartime interrogation with a simple question/ answer & all the time the camera zooming in on your peformance.
    See > Mastermind BBC Disastermind TV Hell 1992. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGZxcZtkwqw especially the segment starting at 2:28

    In fairness, Humphrys doesn't really do that any more, apart from on the celebrity editions. We get more chat with the contestants from Victoria on Only Connect. I don't think that chatting to the contestants is any reflection on how difficult the quiz is.
  • klunkklunk Posts: 1,417
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Mastermind has not dumbed down. If anything, other quiz shows have "smarted up". You have to remember that Mastermind was born in an age when there were only three channels, and other brainy quiz shows were squirreled away at odd parts of the schedule. University Challenge was on ITV at lunchtime on Sunday. Nobody thought that serious quiz shows would get big ratings.
    So it was a gamble by the BBC to place this upmarket quiz show in prime time. By the standards of the time it seemed impressively austere and brainy. It doesn't really look like that now, when people have the internet and are generally more clued-up, but at the time it was considered the ultimate TV quiz.
  • RandysbackRandysback Posts: 3,404
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The biggest question is "Why is it called celebrity mastermind"
  • marieofromaniamarieofromania Posts: 651
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Mastermind is 'Britain's toughest quiz' in the sense that the contestant has most to lose if he or she does badly. Having said that something is your 'specialist subject, and then only getting a few answers right can be pretty embarrassing.
    Also, having been on a few quizzes, Mastermind included, I can tell you I have never been so nervous as when I was waiting for my name to be called to the chair. Absolutely nowhere to hide!
  • MontyzumaMontyzuma Posts: 184
    Forum Member
    Randysback wrote: »
    The biggest question is "Why is it called celebrity mastermind"
    while we are asking that question lets also investigate "Celebrity University Challenge" where celebrity includes academics/researchers. Perhaps they are celebrities within their own peer groups?
  • Guest82722Guest82722 Posts: 10,019
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Mastermind has definitely dumbed down.

    20 years ago I was lucky to get one or two general knowledge questions per contestant right. Now I regularly get about half right- and I don't consider myself to be a brainbox.

    If people select a tv programme as a specialist subject, and it's something I watch, I quite often do as well as the contestant, So, these days, with no serious research, I can often get 15 points (playing as if I were that contestant) and maybe 30+ right for the whole programme- compared to an average of about 6-8 20 years ago.
  • shackfanshackfan Posts: 15,461
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Mastermind has definitely dumbed down.

    20 years ago I was lucky to get one or two general knowledge questions per contestant right. Now I regularly get about half right- and I don't consider myself to be a brainbox.

    If people select a tv programme as a specialist subject, and it's something I watch, I quite often do as well as the contestant, So, these days, with no serious research, I can often get 15 points (playing as if I were that contestant) and maybe 30+ right for the whole programme- compared to an average of about 6-8 20 years ago.

    The older you get, the more knowledge you build up. I would barely get 1 right in the 70's but then I was an average teenager. Now I get half the general knowledge questions right and sometimes a few of the specialist subject ones.
  • lundavralundavra Posts: 31,790
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Mastermind has definitely dumbed down.

    20 years ago I was lucky to get one or two general knowledge questions per contestant right. Now I regularly get about half right- and I don't consider myself to be a brainbox.

    If people select a tv programme as a specialist subject, and it's something I watch, I quite often do as well as the contestant, So, these days, with no serious research, I can often get 15 points (playing as if I were that contestant) and maybe 30+ right for the whole programme- compared to an average of about 6-8 20 years ago.

    Is that because the range of questions on many serious quiz programmes has widened? They used to be very biased towards the classics and I can remember contestants failing to answer very simple science questions and being surprised that they were expected to know anything about such a subject.
  • Guest82722Guest82722 Posts: 10,019
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    shackfan wrote: »
    The older you get, the more knowledge you build up. I would barely get 1 right in the 70's but then I was an average teenager. Now I get half the general knowledge questions right and sometimes a few of the specialist subject ones.

    Well, I was 36 twenty years ago, so a fully formed adult.

    But you would never have got subjects like 'Only Fools and Horses' allowed as a specialist subject until about 10-15 years ago. I haven't 'studied' OFAH, but it's been on so often I know most episodes word for word- so not at all difficult for me to score 10 points- something that never would have happened in the past.
  • Gusto BruntGusto Brunt Posts: 12,351
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I agree, University Challenge has harder questions. I can only get around seven questions right on that.

    Mastermind is much easier, and my score is higher. :D
  • ftvftv Posts: 31,668
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Mastermind was devised by a BBC producer called Bill Wright who had been a prisoner of war and used to arrange quizzes for his fellow inmates. There was a touch of German interrogation techniques as well. All specialist subjects were available except the contestant could not answer questions about himself/herself.When a specialist subject was chosen the researchers would go to the country's leading authority on that particular subject - on more than one occasion they discovered the contestant was actually the leading authority ! I seem to remember that on one occasion they had to stop recording because a contestant argued vehemently that her answer was correct when Magnus said it was wrong - further research proved her right.
  • marieofromaniamarieofromania Posts: 651
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    ftv wrote: »
    Mastermind was devised by a BBC producer called Bill Wright who had been a prisoner of war and used to arrange quizzes for his fellow inmates. There was a touch of German interrogation techniques as well. All specialist subjects were available except the contestant could not answer questions about himself/herself.When a specialist subject was chosen the researchers would go to the country's leading authority on that particular subject - on more than one occasion they discovered the contestant was actually the leading authority ! I seem to remember that on one occasion they had to stop recording because a contestant argued vehemently that her answer was correct when Magnus said it was wrong - further research proved her right.

    The producers don't mind if you query their answer for the specialist subject, as long as you do it at the time. They accept that you've probably spent more time researching the subject than the question setters have.
  • Ben_Fisher1Ben_Fisher1 Posts: 2,973
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Of course Mastermind has been dumbed down. Humphreys is good, but he in no way has the very formal, and intimidating presence that Magnussen had. The questions are easier, and the specialist subjects are definitely dumbed down, no question about it. If you watched an episode from 20 - 25 yrs ago and compared it to a current one I think there would be now argument. The trouble with TV today is that it has to be populist to get audiences, which means everything must be accessible, BBC! is now no more than a slightly better ITV >:(
  • lundavralundavra Posts: 31,790
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Well, I was 36 twenty years ago, so a fully formed adult.

    But you would never have got subjects like 'Only Fools and Horses' allowed as a specialist subject until about 10-15 years ago. I haven't 'studied' OFAH, but it's been on so often I know most episodes word for word- so not at all difficult for me to score 10 points- something that never would have happened in the past.

    You just have to set the questions at a high enough level. I would prefer that no fiction was allowed as a subject but that would mean no Shakespeare, Booker Prize winning novels etc.

    If someone thinks that they are going to get an easy set of questions on something like Only Fools and Horses then you pick the most obscure details like names of people in very minor roles or production staff in the credits, registration numbers of vehicles etc.
  • Heston VestonHeston Veston Posts: 6,495
    Forum Member
    I think University Challenge is tougher than Mastermind. Only Connect is a different animal, less of a general knowledge quiz and more of a mental challenge.
  • milkybarnickmilkybarnick Posts: 605
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Montyzuma wrote: »
    while we are asking that question lets also investigate "Celebrity University Challenge" where celebrity includes academics/researchers. Perhaps they are celebrities within their own peer groups?

    Isn't it "Christmas" University challenge rather than "Celebrity"? All the contestants are alumni of the institutions on the quiz. Some are more generally famous than others (I expect most are well known in their field as mentioned above), but it doesn't seem set up as a "Celebrity" thing.

    There have been Celebrity UCs - seem to remember one either for Comic Relief or Children in Need, one of the two.
  • DDRickyDDDDRickyDD Posts: 5,246
    Forum Member
    Mastermind is actually easier than other quizzes because you get to answer question on your specialist subject. Even a poor quizzer could do well when they get to answer half the questions on their passion.
  • SnrDevSnrDev Posts: 6,094
    Forum Member
    DDRickyDD wrote: »
    Mastermind is actually easier than other quizzes because you get to answer question on your specialist subject. Even a poor quizzer could do well when they get to answer half the questions on their passion.
    But it's in two parts; not much use getting 13 in your subject and only 2 or 3 more in general knowledge.

    Back to the original premise, I'd agree that it's the toughest as it's a one to one, no team mates to defer to or use for thinking time, just the contestant in the glare of a spotlight witha short time, and although the subjects and questions are undoubtedly easier than they were, they're still generally very verbose and need to be listened to. That too adds to the challenge - Only Connect allows teams to stare at the clues. Mastermind is a single wordy question fired at the victim. Granted not as forcefully as Magnus did, but still tough.

    Brain Of Britain on R4 is the same; used to be really hard, not so much now.
  • Heston VestonHeston Veston Posts: 6,495
    Forum Member
    DDRickyDD wrote: »
    Mastermind is actually easier than other quizzes because you get to answer question on your specialist subject. Even a poor quizzer could do well when they get to answer half the questions on their passion.

    Not always; contestants sometimes don't do particularly well on their specialist subject.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastermind_(TV_series)#Lowest_scores
  • MontyzumaMontyzuma Posts: 184
    Forum Member
    Isn't it "Christmas" University challenge rather than "Celebrity"? All the contestants are alumni of the institutions on the quiz. Some are more generally famous than others (I expect most are well known in their field as mentioned above), but it doesn't seem set up as a "Celebrity" thing.

    There have been Celebrity UCs - seem to remember one either for Comic Relief or Children in Need, one of the two.

    Ah ok understood. I probably subconciously applied the Celebrity taint as the questions seem so much easier
  • grimtales1grimtales1 Posts: 46,695
    Forum Member
    I find the questions are a lot easier on the Celebrity Mastermind too :)
  • ATNottsATNotts Posts: 1,238
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I find the questions are a lot easier on the Celebrity Mastermind too

    There's no doubt the Celebrity Mastermind asks much easier questions, in the General Knowledge round, than does the regular edition.

    I find that in the regular version I average between 6 and 8 correct answers per round (dependent probably on how much wine I've consumed by the time the round starts!!) whereas I can always achieve 10 - 12 right in the celeb. editions.

    Only Connect really tests the braincells, and concentration - the latter might be easier to hold if Humphries rather than Victoria Coren-Mitchell were chairing it!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.