I'm still curious as to how you'd go about castrating the female convicted child sex offenders. Or is liberal land still in denial.
Females don't posess testicles therefore cannot be castrated.
Female offences count for less than 10% of those arrested, so although a consideration, not the most threatening of suspects.
I'm not sure how you would deal with them, I would look to science for a solution, and hope that they could find soething similar to castration in men.
What sort of punishment or treatment would you be in favour of?
Females don't posess testicles therefore cannot be castrated.
Female offences count for less than 10% of those arrested, so although a consideration, not the most threatening of suspects.
I'm not sure how you would deal with them, I would look to science for a solution, and hope that they could find something similar to castration in men.
What sort of punishment or treatment would you be in favour of?
erm, you rather seem to have missed the point of my post just a teensy bit
i'm not the one proposing carstarting as a new national sport
I read the title of this thread ages ago at work in the afternoon but didn't bother clicking on it but I new and read straight away what the title meant.
This has to be the most grammar police attack thread ever!
"buggerers" do you mean Buggery? You do realise that some 'pados' are straight and pray on little girls, don't you?
I think they mean those who commit buggery, so 'buggers'. And I think you don't correctly understand what buggery is, as it doesn't exclude the possibility of preying on little girls.
I think they mean those who commit buggery, so 'buggers'. And I think you don't correctly understand what buggery is, as it doesn't exclude the possibility of preying on little girls.
so if i call someone a bugger i'm actuaally saying their a buggerer
I read the title of this thread ages ago at work in the afternoon but didn't bother clicking on it but I new and read straight away what the title meant.
This has to be the most grammar police attack thread ever!
Since it was obvious what the OP meant, there was no reason for anyone to complain about the spelling. Plus it allowed a great deal of innocent fun about what was written.
Since it was obvious what the OP meant, there was no reason for anyone to complain about the spelling. Plus it allowed a great deal of innocent fun about what was written.
Since it was obvious what the OP meant, there was no reason for anyone to complain about the spelling.
No it wasn't obvious, I saw this thread yesterday and decided then to ignore it as being a frivolous "Chatter" type thread. I was surprised to find it still active today so I had a look.
Such grossly mis-spelt or misleading thread titles are a menace, cause wasted time and are in my opinion as bad as or worse than 'txt spk' (which is frowned on in the DS rules). It will just end up as chatter, if it hasn't already done so (and I'm not going to read it all to find out).
Comments
I fail to see where Miss Georgie restricted "child" to mean males only.
Females don't posess testicles therefore cannot be castrated.
Female offences count for less than 10% of those arrested, so although a consideration, not the most threatening of suspects.
I'm not sure how you would deal with them, I would look to science for a solution, and hope that they could find soething similar to castration in men.
What sort of punishment or treatment would you be in favour of?
erm, you rather seem to have missed the point of my post just a teensy bit
i'm not the one proposing carstarting as a new national sport
I read the title of this thread ages ago at work in the afternoon but didn't bother clicking on it but I new and read straight away what the title meant.
This has to be the most grammar police attack thread ever!
good alot of people have to
shall we start a forum patition
and a DS forum petition is going to force this to happen of course... so much influence.
Unless you meant a forum partition of fors and againsts!!
Yeh Paedos should be jailed. At least in jail they will get taught a lesson by other prisoners
I think they mean those who commit buggery, so 'buggers'. And I think you don't correctly understand what buggery is, as it doesn't exclude the possibility of preying on little girls.
so if i call someone a bugger i'm actuaally saying their a buggerer
It's just as well you're not the grammar police.
Lol! ...
Nobody complained about the spelling.
Really?:eek:
Hey I am the secret Grammer Perleese
That is where the word bugger comes from, the act of buggery.
Quite what buggers have to do with pados and getting cars started though gawd knows!
No it wasn't obvious, I saw this thread yesterday and decided then to ignore it as being a frivolous "Chatter" type thread. I was surprised to find it still active today so I had a look.
Such grossly mis-spelt or misleading thread titles are a menace, cause wasted time and are in my opinion as bad as or worse than 'txt spk' (which is frowned on in the DS rules). It will just end up as chatter, if it hasn't already done so (and I'm not going to read it all to find out).
What happened to him?