Prosecutors, meanwhile, say Harris will not stand trial over allegations he downloaded sexual images of children.
They claimed Harris had indecent images of children, as part of a larger collection of adult pornography, but decided it was not in the public interest to prosecute him.
and he had the flat out neck to threaten a libel suit.
There is no proof he had images of children from what I understand and the charge was quickly dropped when defence counsel offered evidence proving some of them were over 18.
and he had the flat out neck to threaten a libel suit.
Regarding this they were not young children but they cannot confirm the age of the teenagers in the pictures. It appears they came from a website in Ukraine.
There is no proof he had images of children from what I understand and the charge was quickly dropped when defence counsel offered evidence proving some of them were over 18.
Regarding this they were not young children but they cannot confirm the age of the teenagers in the pictures. It appears they came from a website in Ukraine.
i didn`t know that, it just says "not in the public interest" that where i`m reading.
Comments
I expect so.
and he had the flat out neck to threaten a libel suit.
Regarding this they were not young children but they cannot confirm the age of the teenagers in the pictures. It appears they came from a website in Ukraine.
if that is the case its disgusting
Edit Yes. Well he's got away with the child pornography on his computer???
i didn`t know that, it just says "not in the public interest" that where i`m reading.
I am actually surprised he got that long. Really pleased that he got time.
Someone told me that earlier and it came from an Australian site.
i`m listening to the live thing so i may have misheard but that would be an unbelievable bloody travesty if i didn`t.
I'm glad he got time too. Just doesn't seem right for what his victims went through. But I'm glad he's going to jail.
i read it on the bbc news page but these things are just shared aren`t they.
Or not.