Josie Cunningham ('NHS Boob Job Girl') - the latest
Addisonian
Posts: 16,377 Forum Member
✭✭
Sorry to give this one more of the attention that she so obviously craves but I guess she didn't sell as many tickets to the live birth of her child as she thought she would as she has another money-making scheme up her sleeve:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/ampp3d/josie-cunningham-sell-breast-milk-4467930
I thought the whole reason for the NHS breast enlargement was because she claims she was born without any natural breast tissue? So how can she produce breast milk?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/ampp3d/josie-cunningham-sell-breast-milk-4467930
I thought the whole reason for the NHS breast enlargement was because she claims she was born without any natural breast tissue? So how can she produce breast milk?
0
Comments
Everybody knows her game now and the only people actually eager to discuss it are WUM's.
I really can't see what more there is to discuss about her that hasn't been said a hundred times over in every other thread about her.
Did you care to actually comment on the thread subject or did you just come here to nitpick and whinge?
Just because she was devoid of the 'fatty' breast tissue it presumably doesn't mean that her nipples, lobules and milk ducts were also missing.
Or are you just miffed that I couldn't be arsed to search for another thread about her to add this to?
Christ, what a bunch of miserys on here tonight.
Considering there's already a very large thread dedicated to her in GD, there really isn't anything anyone can say about her that hasn't already been said. And if there is, it's likely in the other thread about her in Showbiz.
If her agent sees how popular she's becoming, she may never disappear off the face of the (media) earth
I'm miffed that people keep giving her attention. I think we are all pissed off and fed up of hearing about her, yes.
Every thread started about her devolves into misogynistic rubbish that not even she deserves though.
Literally, what is the point?
Tip for the day: don't give attention to blatant attention seekers?
She will, anyone remember Fiona Wright who would sell her stories to the papers in the 80's about her 'sexploits' totally forgotten now
If you're so miffed about her getting more attention why add to the thread? You are effectively keeping it on the front page for more posters to see afterall.
Why on earth do you think?
Maybe the next time somebody thinks it's a bright idea to give an attention seeker more attention they'll think again.
Yeah, sure you can start a thread on whatever you like but don't expect a very positive response if you start one on low life like this which has already done the rounds far too many times.
That maybe so, but it's worth it if it puts people off starting yet another thread in future.
Basically, yes.
Then why did you write "contributing" as to opposed to something like "commenting on..." or "starting a thread on..." if it was primarily aimed at me?
Or are you saying that we shouldn't start threads about things that we find morally objectionable? Because GD'd be practically empty if that were the case.
Just to be clear, I used the word "contributing" because that's what I meant. That can be applied to commenting on or starting threads on DS, or any other area of life. In this case I posted it in response to the Opening Post (see BiB), not you personally. ;-)
And no, I wasn't saying that we shouldn't start threads about things that we find morally objectionable. That would be ridiculous. I meant that if you find vacuous attention seekers being provided with publicity objectionable (as most of us do), then don't give them the attention/publicity that they seek, n'est pas?
(No need to reply, thanks.)
[Edit] Oh sh*t! Everything in this post was meant to be sent as a PM to Addisonian! >:(
OP, you could have just googled, and then you would have discovered that 'flatchested' women can breastfeed.
I am pretty sure they are not the same thing, and that people without the fatty breast tissue can still breastfeed because they still have the milk ducts and things. Just not the tissue that makes boobs bigger?