If you put all the winners in the house together...
[Deleted User]
Posts: 989
Forum Member
✭✭
... who do you think would win?
Craig, Brian D, Kate, Cameron, Nadia, Anthony, Pete, Brian B, or Rachel?
Craig, Brian D, Kate, Cameron, Nadia, Anthony, Pete, Brian B, or Rachel?
0
Comments
I'd personally be voting for Rachel. I would never ever vote for Cameron. I didn't watch it last year so I don't know who Brian B is but I'd choose him over Cameron any day.
If being completely fake and acting your way through three months of Big Brother makes more sense, then yes I agree.
er.. Rachel..?
Rachel was so genuine!
What of her?
If you mean the country want entertainers and they voted for Rachel, Brian D's vote to win was 4.3 million. How many votes did Rachel get?
The public want entertainers, they have only rarely got them (IMO).
1.Brian D
2.Pete
3.Nadia
4.Craig
5.Cameron
6.Kate
7.Anthony
8.Rachel
9.Brian B
Of the others I quite liked Cameron, and could tolerate Anthony, Kate and Craig, I found Brian B to be slightly irritating, Pete was little more than a "gimmick" contestant and I couldn't stand Nadia. So I suppose my prefered order would be
1st Brian D
2nd Rachel
3rd Cameron
4th Craig
5th Kate
6th Antony
7th Brian B
8th Pete
9th Nadia
2nd Nadia (she was my winner that year)
3rd Pete (he was my winner that year)
4th Craig (I wanted Anna to win that year)
5th Kate (she was my winner that year)
6th Brain D (I wanted Helen to win that year)
7th Anthony (he was my winner that year)
8th Brian B (I didn't watch that year)
9th Cameron (Nush was my winner that year)
1) We would look on each one as they were when they were in the house, we would probably be expecting them to be the same, but everyone changes and going back to the beginning its now 9 years since Craig won and 8 since orig Brian and so on, not only will they have changed but our memories will have faded and been distorted by time and they just will not be the same "characters" they were when they won.
2) The biggest problem is that it would not be fair as the more recent ones would be stronger in our minds, for example Rachel would have a bigger fan base then say Craig from BB1 as his would have forgotten him and because of that it would not be a fair or equal contest and frankly you can't compare someone from 9 years ago to someone from a couple of months ago with any even handedness.
oh and one final point relating to the 'show' itself is that as winners and prev hms, the element of mystery surrounding brand new hms would be lost and the show as a consequence would suffer and they having all been there and worn the t-shirt would not be the unsuspecting innocents - it would be nothing like a proper BB imo and just wouldn't work.
I agree with Barracute. It just wouldn't work.