New Guardian website

Turnbull2000Turnbull2000 Posts: 7,588
Forum Member
Bloody awful IMO! Too many big pictures and big bland tiles. Horrible to navigate and pick out worthwhile articles and opinion pieces. Seems almost entirely designed for casual, younger tablet/smartphone users and sharing via facebook/twitter!

Does anyone actually like it?

Comments

  • MesostimMesostim Posts: 52,864
    Forum Member
    Is it "vile"?
  • CreamteaCreamtea Posts: 14,682
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Should I be outraged????
  • SemieroticSemierotic Posts: 11,131
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I used to go on Comment Is Free a lot, but can't be bothered anymore. They've designed it for tablets and mobiles, and don't seem to care about those on computers.

    Shame, for all its stereotypical lefty rants there were a lot of good articles (and comments) on there.
  • KapellmeisterKapellmeister Posts: 41,322
    Forum Member
    I don't mind the look of it but it is hard to sniff out that miniscule number of articles that are actually worth reading.
  • Turnbull2000Turnbull2000 Posts: 7,588
    Forum Member
    Semierotic wrote: »
    I used to go on Comment Is Free a lot, but can't be bothered anymore.

    Likewise.

    Any mobile or tablet users who like it?
  • SemieroticSemierotic Posts: 11,131
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    This 'tablet style revolution' is nothing new, I know quite a few sites that have fallen prey to it (remember the furore over DS). I guess the thinking is that ad blockers are harder to implement on mobile devices?
  • KapellmeisterKapellmeister Posts: 41,322
    Forum Member
    Semierotic wrote: »
    I used to go on Comment Is Free a lot, but can't be bothered anymore. They've designed it for tablets and mobiles, and don't seem to care about those on computers.

    Shame, for all its stereotypical lefty rants there were a lot of good articles (and comments) on there.

    You mean 'Comment is Free as long as we agree with the comment': the lefty version of free speech. I've been put on pre-moderation more times than I care to remember and I can't be bothered with it anymore.
  • SemieroticSemierotic Posts: 11,131
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    You mean 'Comment is Free as long as we agree with the comment': the lefty version of free speech. I've been put on pre-moderation more times than I care to remember and I can't be bothered with it anymore.

    Their moderation was overzelous, but the vast majority of comments to any given article tended to disagree with the authors. Its readership definitely wasn't a left-wing love-in. Which made it more interesting, of course.
  • KapellmeisterKapellmeister Posts: 41,322
    Forum Member
    Semierotic wrote: »
    Their moderation was overzelous, but the vast majority of comments to any given article tended to disagree with the authors. Its readership definitely wasn't a left-wing love-in. Which made it more interesting, of course.

    Fair point. If they moderated all the comments that disagreed with their articles then there would be hardly any comments left, so out-of-step with reality has the Guardian become.
  • FrankBTFrankBT Posts: 4,218
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Semierotic wrote: »
    Their moderation was overzelous, but the vast majority of comments to any given article tended to disagree with the authors. Its readership definitely wasn't a left-wing love-in. Which made it more interesting, of course.
    Which just goes to show how deluded are those who believe the Guardian is aimed at a 'Leftie' readership.
  • KapellmeisterKapellmeister Posts: 41,322
    Forum Member
    FrankBT wrote: »
    Which just goes to show how deluded are those who believe the Guardian is aimed at a 'Leftie' readership.

    The readership might not be but the paper certainly thinks it is: a silver-spoon, middle-class, Islington-based version of the Socialist Worker. It's an utter joke.
Sign In or Register to comment.