Muxco Surrey

Robert WilliamsRobert Williams Posts: 2,212
Forum Member
✭✭✭
Although this was not one of the muxes included in last year's Memorandum of Understanding which required the launch of five muxes in the following 18 months, Muxco have recently updated the wording on their website http://www.muxco.com/applications/northsussexandsurrey/ and although there is not much new there, they say they are hoping to announce launch plans 'shortly'.

The 'Sussex' part of the name has gone, as Muxco intend to cover the county of Surrey only, with north Sussex being covered by an extension of NOW Digital's Sussex Coast mux, which makes far more sense than the original plans. This requires either London 3 or Sussex Coast to move from 11B to 10B. The Ofcom documents in 2011 proposed moving London 3 to 10B, but I can't see how that can be possible seeing as Oxford has now launched on 10B; maybe Sussex will move instead.

The Surrey line-up at present only has BBC Surrey, Eagle and County Sound (i.e. Eagle Extra), though the community station Redstone FM based in Redhill reckon they'll be on there. I would have thought that Heart Sussex & Surrey (ex-Mercury FM) might be there as well.

Surrey apparently has the highest DAB ownership in the country, and although most of the county has always had access to the London muxes, it will be nice to get something more local on there.
«1345678

Comments

  • BangersBangers Posts: 3,644
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I think that Bath is the area with the highest DAB ownership in the UK, although as a county Surrey might have the best take-up of any county.

    Latest I heard was that London 3 might move to 5A.
  • OrangyOrangy Posts: 1,441
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    If they still plan to cover East Surrey from Reigate only, then they should re-consider. Need Caterham and a directional antenna on CP to make it of any use beyond Godstone to the east.

    Further, East Grinstead is a big DAB blackspot in general, could do with both improved national and local DAB coverage there.

    London III move should help with Sussex, their current coverage is woeful, even between Eastbourne and Brighton, in the primary service area! Sussex really ought to be covering the whole county, not just part of it.
  • OrangyOrangy Posts: 1,441
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Surrey apparently has the highest DAB ownership in the country, and although most of the county has always had access to the London muxes, it will be nice to get something more local on there.

    It's a shame that actually, most of the local stations probably won't be - either due to cost or anti-DAB.

    Eagle owners UKRD on the fence, but will probably end up on the Surrey MUX.

    Jackie - don't believe they want to be.

    The Breeze (formally Kestrel, formally Delta) - no idea, possibly out of the TSA

    Susy - probably down to cost?

    Hopefully the MUX won't be almost completely empty or full of the usual London stuff given it's almost complete overlap
  • Martin PhillpMartin Phillp Posts: 34,862
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Orangy wrote: »
    It's a shame that actually, most of the local stations probably won't be - either due to cost or anti-DAB.

    Eagle owners UKRD on the fence, but will probably end up on the Surrey MUX.

    Jackie - don't believe they want to be.

    The Breeze (formally Kestrel, formally Delta) - no idea, possibly out of the TSA

    Susy - probably down to cost?

    Hopefully the MUX won't be almost completely empty or full of the usual London stuff given it's almost complete overlap

    UKRD will put their large stations on DAB, as is the case with Pirate in Cornwall.

    Jackie are as anti-DAB as you can get while under the ownership of Mr Collis.

    The Breeze - Celador's policy has been to remove the Breeze from DAB to concentrate on local delivery on FM. DAB wouldn't allow them to transmit the Winchester, Southampton and Portsmouth links on the South Hampshire mux for example.

    Community radio has managed to launch on DAB. Black Cat Radio for example in Cambs and Desi Radio in London. Whether Susy would want to stretch their resources to cover a mux which would be heard in Guildford is a matter for them. Personally, CR on DAB unless you're covering a niche market, such as Desi is a no, no.
  • hanssolohanssolo Posts: 22,648
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Orangy wrote: »
    If they still plan to cover East Surrey from Reigate only, then they should re-consider. Need Caterham and a directional antenna on CP to make it of any use beyond Godstone to the east.

    Further, East Grinstead is a big DAB blackspot in general, could do with both improved national and local DAB coverage there.

    London III move should help with Sussex, their current coverage is woeful, even between Eastbourne and Brighton, in the primary service area! Sussex really ought to be covering the whole county, not just part of it.
    CP was part 2 of Surrey coverage but looks like they may use Woldingham and other sites instead?
    http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/radiolicensing/dab-maps/Surrey.pdf
    the rollout plans for Sussex includes a transmitter for East Grinstead
    http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/radiolicensing/dab-maps/Sussex.pdf
    Midhurst may have both muxes?

    If they don't get a FM licence on round 2 (unlikely as Ofcom say none are free) then perhaps Radio Brooklands
    http://www.brooklandsradio.co.uk
    might go DAB (along with Redstone) if they can raise the funds, but will then be in competition with Jackie and the London stations spillover which will be hard going?
  • mattdmattd Posts: 1,086
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    We still have a little more work to do on our transmission plans for Surrey before we make any announcements. We hope to have coverage from Crystal Palace.

    Matt
    MuxCo
  • hanssolohanssolo Posts: 22,648
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    UKRD have published good financial reports for some areas of operation but made no mention of DAB?
    http://radiotoday.co.uk/2013/06/ukrd-pays-more-dividends-in-difficult-times/
    But from the last UKRD release about DAB in January
    http://www.ukrd.com/news/latest-ukrd-news/882891/switch-over-off-after-latest-dab-data-published/
    “The Government should allow this process to evolve, delivering a multi-platform environment we can all support, including DAB, led by consumer desires rather than artificially distorting everything, including statistics, to deliver something that will end up in a complete mess if rushed.”
    Seems to want to still be involved in DAB and Surrey has a high DAB listening figure, so the UKRD results must be good for the Surrey mux, hopefully to launch this year.
  • Robert WilliamsRobert Williams Posts: 2,212
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    MuxCo have today posted an update on their website, that they plan to launch the Surrey mux in December 2013.

    http://www.muxco.com/blog/2013/07/18/muxco-surrey-update-18th-july-2013/
  • OrangyOrangy Posts: 1,441
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Woo, about time.

    Bet it's not live until February 2014 ;)
  • countyboycountyboy Posts: 1,486
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Orangy wrote: »
    Woo, about time.

    Bet it's not live until February 2014 ;)

    Yes - Judging by the constant delays over many years with the Gloucestershire and other Muxes, you'd be crazy to place any money on the Surrey Mux being there on the date predicted by Muxco.

    I hope the transmitter coverage is better for Surrey too, as a key part of Gloucestershire will not be served by Muxco.
  • Robert WilliamsRobert Williams Posts: 2,212
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Mentioned this in the Roger Day thread, but might be useful to keep all the information together in this thread, there has been a further update to MuxCo's blog, which includes maps of the proposed coverage areas:

    http://www.muxco.com/blog/2013/09/12/surrey-launch-update-12th-september-2013/
  • WillumWillum Posts: 1,481
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The use of Crystal Palace, considering how far outside the intended service boundary it is, surprises me.

    Presumably it'll be highly directional to the south west with heavy restrictions in most other directions?

    Power levels?
  • hanssolohanssolo Posts: 22,648
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Willum wrote: »
    The use of Crystal Palace, considering how far outside the intended service boundary it is, surprises me.

    Presumably it'll be highly directional to the south west with heavy restrictions in most other directions?

    Power levels?
    Traditionally Crystal Palace and Croyden is in Surrey, where the border went up to Southwark and Lambeth, hense the Oval is the home of the Surrey Cricket club, until the administration building was moved to Kingston, which according to politics is also now no longer Surrey, but is still reguarded as being Surrey.
  • OrangyOrangy Posts: 1,441
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    hanssolo wrote: »
    Traditionally Crystal Palace and Croyden is in Surrey, where the border went up to Southwark and Lambeth, hense the Oval is the home of the Surrey Cricket club, until the administration building was moved to Kingston, which according to politics is also now no longer Surrey, but is still reguarded as being Surrey.

    I guess it's to cover the north and far eastern parts where Reigate does not reach. Except Oxted which is a black hole for any over the air TV, FM and DAB! Shame Caterham or Warlingham isn't in the plan for launch. Yet again Oxted, a fairly big town in the county misses out.

    As for Roger, good to see he'll be part of Redstone.

    I wonder if SUSY consider joining MuxCo or even seeing what happens with the Ofcom super local DAB idea.
  • CitySlickerCitySlicker Posts: 10,414
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Still no mention of North Wales, North Yorkshire, Lincolnshire or Somerset launches. It's only been five years these have been waiting to launch. Maybe Matt is waiting for North Yorks sixth anniversary before doing something (or nothing?) - that's only three months away.

    I've said it before Matt, over many years now - launch them, or hand them back.
  • Thine WonkThine Wonk Posts: 17,190
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Still no mention of North Wales, North Yorkshire, Lincolnshire or Somerset launches. It's only been five years these have been waiting to launch. Maybe Matt is waiting for North Yorks sixth anniversary before doing something (or nothing?) - that's only three months away.

    I've said it before Matt, over many years now - launch them, or hand them back.

    I said this in another thread as the Gloucestershire one is still not launched and the Somerset we don't even have any idea.

    I got the excuse that Ofcom told them to delay and that Ofcom delayed them for several years. I'm not sure they should have bid if they didn't think it was viable and were committed to launching within months of the licence being awarded.

    We've lost 5 years of better local radio, when another bidder could have launched. It also seems that often promises made at application, like a wide variety of content for different audiences isn't materialising either.
  • BangersBangers Posts: 3,644
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Orangy wrote: »
    Yet again Oxted, a fairly big town in the county misses out.
    Oxted a big town in Surrey, you have got to be kidding?

    I'd hardly call a population of 12,500 "fairly big". Especially when nearby Caterham has a population of 20,000. There's other towns in Surrey such as Farnham with a population 38,000 and of course there's Woking with a population of 62,000. I could go on and on.

    I think MuxCo have the balance right for their launch coverage.
  • OrangyOrangy Posts: 1,441
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Bangers wrote: »
    Oxted a big town in Surrey, you have got to be kidding?

    I'd hardly call a population of 12,500 "fairly big". Especially when nearby Caterham has a population of 20,000. There's other towns in Surrey such as Farnham with a population 38,000 and of course there's Woking with a population of 62,000. I could go on and on.

    I think MuxCo have the balance right for their launch coverage.

    Sorry, I meant to say in East Surrey!
    Caterham won't fair much better in the valley anyway.

    But fair point.
  • CitySlickerCitySlicker Posts: 10,414
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Thine Wonk wrote: »
    I said this in another thread as the Gloucestershire one is still not launched and the Somerset we don't even have any idea.

    I got the excuse that Ofcom told them to delay and that Ofcom delayed them for several years. I'm not sure they should have bid if they didn't think it was viable and were committed to launching within months of the licence being awarded.

    We've lost 5 years of better local radio, when another bidder could have launched. It also seems that often promises made at application, like a wide variety of content for different audiences isn't materialising either.

    I think Ofcom needs to review its awarding process now and decide if a service has failed to launch within, say, six months of being awarded its licence is revoked.

    Plenty of people have made comments to me that no-one else would have these multiplexes, and MuxCo still have time etc etc., the fact is had MuxCo handed these licences back when I originally called for it probably around 3-4 years ago they could have been readvertised and transmitting by now.

    MuxCo is simply a shambles in my view and one of the worst things to happen to local DAB. Their favourite game at one point seemed to be blame everyone but themselves, I don't know how they stand currently as their position seems to be ignore all criticism.
  • hanssolohanssolo Posts: 22,648
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Muxco and Now Arqiva could have said to Ofcom the DAB frequency review is taking too long and they want to launch new muxes, Ofcom got a lot of planning wrong like giving London 3 and Sussex the same frequency which compromised powers and coverage so was important to replan correctly.
    Also during a recession funds were tight so the delay may have helped funding, and although may have slowed the growth of DAB usage did not stop DAB.
    Although this was not one of the muxes included in last year's Memorandum of Understanding which required the launch of five muxes in the following 18 months,
    Looks like they are getting on with it and although do not have to set a launch date for Surrey until after the legal signing of the MOU and DSO plan, but are going for a December launch

    Hopefully the legal signing of the MOU and DSO plan will also sort out the funding and planning problems with several of the existing muxes like London 3 and Sussex for a frequency change and improved coverage.
  • SouthCitySouthCity Posts: 12,465
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I think Ofcom needs to review its awarding process now and decide if a service has failed to launch within, say, six months of being awarded its licence is revoked.

    Ofcom were holding up the process due to their planning review, Now Digital didn't launch any of their new muxes for five years either. They were sitting on four of them in the Home Counties and Derbyshire.

    MuxCo only have a minority share in the Somerset mux, a company called Triple Media Limited owns 67% of it. They have given a launch date as "before Q2 2014" - it's the last post in this thread:

    http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1878590&highlight=somerset+dab

    Ofcom have apparently given the licence holders until 2014 to launch all of their new muxes. From what I have read Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire will launch in Summer 2014, when MXR Yorkshire closes.

    Ofcom will then need to address Cumbria & Suffolk, for which there are no licence holders.

    It's interesting to note that 52% of listening in Somerset is via digital platforms even though BBC Somerset isn't on DAB.
  • Robert WilliamsRobert Williams Posts: 2,212
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    SouthCity wrote: »
    Ofcom were holding up the process due to their planning review, Now Digital didn't launch any of their new muxes for five years either. They were sitting on four of them in the Home Counties and Derbyshire.
    Indeed, there seemed to endless rounds of consulations, and even a plan at one point to merge various multiplex areas together, for example, the Surrey and Sussex muxes would have combined to become one, so it would have been difficult for MuxCo and Arqiva to plan for muxes that might have ended up not launching as originally planned.
    hanssolo wrote: »
    Hopefully the legal signing of the MOU and DSO plan will also sort out the funding and planning problems with several of the existing muxes like London 3 and Sussex for a frequency change and improved coverage.
    Has there actually been a decision yet on which of those two muxes is going to be the one to change, and to what frequency? It seems to be anybody's guess as to when this will happen, and the additional transmitters go on air to allow the northern parts of Sussex to at last be able to hear their local stations on DAB.
  • hanssolohanssolo Posts: 22,648
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Has there actually been a decision yet on which of those two muxes is going to be the one to change, and to what frequency? It seems to be anybody's guess as to when this will happen, and the additional transmitters go on air to allow the northern parts of Sussex to at last be able to hear their local stations on DAB.
    London 3 DRG was to move to 10b according to http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/dab-coverage-planning/annex-b/
    But since then the size of the Sussex area grew and the MXR frequencies became available.
    If a positive dso date is proposed by the Government the extra sites will be added, if not positive they will not be added.
  • Robert WilliamsRobert Williams Posts: 2,212
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Further update from MuxCo: http://www.muxco.com/blog/2013/10/03/update-on-surrey-multiplex-3rd-october-2013/

    Looks like things are progressing rather better in Surrey than they have been in the other areas, and they're still on track for a December launch, with the additional transmitters launching in April 2014.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 49
    Forum Member
    SouthCity wrote: »
    From what I have read Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire will launch in Summer 2014, when MXR Yorkshire closes.

    Sorry, to go off topic, but as somebody who is keenly anticipating the Lincolnshire launch, could you state whereabouts you read this?
Sign In or Register to comment.