Options

Oscar Pistorius Trial (Merged)

1495496498500501546

Comments

  • Options
    ustarionustarion Posts: 20,322
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Why on earth is a geologist dealing with sound analysis?
  • Options
    Entropy_NebulaEntropy_Nebula Posts: 538
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    porky42 wrote: »
    Oh no he's going to show RouxTube again!

    Is that the South African sub-category of Rudetube/xhamster/tnaflix etc?
  • Options
    StrakerStraker Posts: 79,654
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ustarion wrote: »
    Why on earth is a geologist dealing with sound analysis?

    His rocks talk to him. At night. In the dark...
  • Options
    NoFussNoFrillsNoFussNoFrills Posts: 4,642
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    cavalli wrote: »
    He's not as arse licky as Roux.

    Hehehe very true
  • Options
    KapellmeisterKapellmeister Posts: 41,322
    Forum Member
    3-4 trials PER YEAR. How many times does that need to be corrected here?

    Once a lie finds fertile ground it tends to take root...
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 32,379
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nels ripping Dixon a new one.
  • Options
    domedome Posts: 55,878
    Forum Member
    I think Nel is proving one size doesn't fit all with this witness.
  • Options
    InspirationInspiration Posts: 62,706
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    ustarion wrote: »
    Why on earth is a geologist dealing with sound analysis?

    Because he has 18 years experience working for the forensics department of the police.
  • Options
    lynwood3lynwood3 Posts: 24,904
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    porky42 wrote: »
    I'm waiting for the rap version of the shots by DJ Dr Dix

    :D:D:D
  • Options
    BellaRosaBellaRosa Posts: 36,549
    Forum Member
    jazzyjake wrote: »
    why don't you shrink the pages so you can fit both on the screen

    If you knew my techno knowledge you will know why. I keep closing the the windows down by mistake :blush: I am a disaster zone :D
  • Options
    1fab1fab Posts: 20,052
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Surely the cricket bat sounds would only be valid if they were recorded from a distance, outside the building, because that is the way they would have been heard by witnesses on the night.
  • Options
    StrakerStraker Posts: 79,654
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Ah....Now Oscar got to influence the "expert" testimony. Unbelievable.
  • Options
    porky42porky42 Posts: 12,796
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    ustarion wrote: »
    Why on earth is a geologist dealing with sound analysis?

    He does have 18 years in police forensics much of it in a senior position. Geology is a common route into forensics. Nothing to see here...
  • Options
    josjos Posts: 9,992
    Forum Member
    Oh no he asked the accused - so not independent observations then.

    I Can't believe this!
  • Options
    jazzyjakejazzyjake Posts: 1,083
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    BellaRosa wrote: »
    If you knew my techno knowledge you will know why. I keep closing the the windows down by mistake :blush: I am a disaster zone :D

    press the square on the top of the page next to the minimise button
  • Options
    bobbydbobbyd Posts: 3,388
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nel I have lots of notes but it's your fault - Oscaresque ;-)
  • Options
    Eater SundaeEater Sundae Posts: 10,000
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    CBFreak wrote: »
    If according to the defence Reeva was holding her arm out, could she have not been trying to hold the door closed?

    Doesn't it open outwards?
  • Options
    InspirationInspiration Posts: 62,706
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jos wrote: »
    Oh no he asked the accused - so not independent observations then.

    I Can't believe this!

    Believe it or not the defence lawyers spoke to the accused too.
  • Options
    Mr_X_123Mr_X_123 Posts: 1,837
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    David Dadic ‏@DavidDadic 2m

    Why do I get the feeling the defence struggled to find "experts" who were willing and able to support them. It better get better than this.


    Bingo. Bingo. Bingo. Bingo. Bingo.
  • Options
    NoFussNoFrillsNoFussNoFrills Posts: 4,642
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Don't worry it will all be ok as he asked OP....
  • Options
    StrakerStraker Posts: 79,654
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Once a lie finds fertile ground it tends to take root...

    We`re all very clear that he SAID he testifies in 3-4 trials a year. Misrepresenting that to score a cheap point is somewhat sad.
  • Options
    LeeahLeeah Posts: 20,239
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Nihonga wrote: »
    Yay, Leeah!! You're awake!:D:D:D;-):D:p

    I am :D Nel's arrival woke me up:blush: thing is the guy wouldn't be as bad if he just got to the point and just gave a simple answer, but just like Oscar I had enough of his long rambling on :)
  • Options
    josjos Posts: 9,992
    Forum Member
    Believe it or not the defence lawyers spoke to the accused too.

    Surely you must see the difference.
  • Options
    lynwood3lynwood3 Posts: 24,904
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    BellaRosa wrote: »
    If you knew my techno knowledge you will know why. I keep closing the the windows down by mistake :blush: I am a disaster zone :D

    I poot it to yew .....yew are not an expirt

    Practice makes perfect
  • Options
    domedome Posts: 55,878
    Forum Member
    Mr_X_123 wrote: »
    David Dadic ‏@DavidDadic 2m

    Why do I get the feeling the defence struggled to find "experts" who were willing and able to support them. It better get better than this.


    Bingo. Bingo. Bingo. Bingo. Bingo.

    Exactly what I said yesterday.
This discussion has been closed.