Options

Opinion Polls Discussion Thread (Part 3)

24567407

Comments

  • Options
    TelevisionUserTelevisionUser Posts: 41,417
    Forum Member
    FMKK wrote: »
    It might be the case that the Tories need every seat they can get though.

    Gove denying that a deal will be done with UKIP is the same as Miliband saying that he won't do a deak with Sturgeon. Both parties have to continue to appear confident that they can win a majority. Once we actually get the numbers and the hung parliament we expect, then they won't be so unequivocal to rule anything out.

    Given the way how the poll numbers actually are (33% +/-1%) for both largest parties, it is highly delusional of them to think that they will get a majority and I hope that most people would be able to see through that blatant posturing.
  • Options
    FMKKFMKK Posts: 32,074
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Given the way how the poll numbers actually are (33% +/-1%) for both largest parties, it is highly delusional of them to think that they will get a majority and I hope that most people would be able to see through that blatant posturing.

    I would assume so, but they still have to keep campaigning for their own side first. Especially in Miliband's case where his party is in direct competition with the SNP, although he may as well just cut the useless Murphy and co. loose at this point.
  • Options
    TassiumTassium Posts: 31,639
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    marke09 wrote: »
    https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/04/18/public-most-embarrassed-vote-ukip-most-proud-vote-/

    I wonder if the polls reflect the above where people were asked if they were embarrassed to say who they may vote for
    Tassium wrote: »
    Some of the polls do these days.

    I think this time Labour have the embarrassment factor as well.
    Boyard wrote: »
    Did you not read the link? Labour attracts the most pride in voters.

    These days both pride and embarrassment are neck and neck when it comes to Labour/Conservative.

    From the link: (embarrassed/proud)

    Labour: 33/20
    ....Con: 39/17


    We know how these polls work, that's a statistical tie.
  • Options
    OLD HIPPY GUYOLD HIPPY GUY Posts: 28,199
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Boyard wrote: »
    Typical Gemini.
    As a Gemini I agree with the other Gemini .....probably.
    ;-)
  • Options
    MattXfactorMattXfactor Posts: 3,223
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    oo new thread, it really is getting close to the big day!
  • Options
    FMKKFMKK Posts: 32,074
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Still feels a good bit away for me. Manifestos are out, The polls have been relatively consistent to the point of stalemate and all the potential alliances have been discussed to death so I'm not sure what more the parties can really do. I can see a dull few weeks as their afraid of doing anything to damage their positions.
  • Options
    MattXfactorMattXfactor Posts: 3,223
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    FMKK wrote: »
    Still feels a good bit away for me. Manifestos are out, The polls have been relatively consistent to the point of stalemate and all the potential alliances have been discussed to death so I'm not sure what more the parties can really do. I can see a dull few weeks as their afraid of doing anything to damage their positions.

    I think it will be relatively "still" until it gets to 7 days to go where naturally people who are "undecided" will be tuning in watching more etc.
  • Options
    SoppyfanSoppyfan Posts: 29,911
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Someone mentioned in the previous part of this thread (before part 3 was made) that Swinson may defy the odds in Dunbartonshire East, well according to this constituency poll, it tells a much different story:
    http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2015/04/east-dunbartonshire/
  • Options
    carnoch04carnoch04 Posts: 10,275
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I think the effect of name recognition gets lost in polls like this one. If you give a list of parties and ask who you are voting for you get one answer. If you actually mention the candidates by name. people recognise Swinson's name and you get a different result. I still think she may lose but I think it could be close.
  • Options
    TelevisionUserTelevisionUser Posts: 41,417
    Forum Member
    carnoch04 wrote: »
    I think the effect of name recognition gets lost in polls like this one. If you give a list of parties and ask who you are voting for you get one answer. If you actually mention the candidates by name. people recognise Swinson's name and you get a different result. I still think she may lose but I think it could be close.

    Yes, how the questions are asked can have a role to play in the answers received. "Which party do you intend to vote for?" could indeed produced a different a different result from "Which candidate do you intend to vote for in this constituency?" even if the latter question is accompanied naming the party, e.g., "Jo Swinson, the Liberal Democrat Candidate".

    Notwithstanding the general UK and Scottish polls, I suspect that a number of Liberal Democrat and Scottish Labour MPs will survive the worst predictions.
  • Options
    carnoch04carnoch04 Posts: 10,275
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Having said that, I am not sure that name recognition is a good thing for Jim Murphy!
  • Options
    mossy2103mossy2103 Posts: 84,308
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Given the way how the poll numbers actually are (33% +/-1%) for both largest parties, it is highly delusional of them to think that they will get a majority and I hope that most people would be able to see through that blatant posturing.
    But if either party publicly accepted that they would not get a majority, it would be portrayed as being defeatist, lacking the spine for a fight, giving up etc. It would also be bad for party morale, especially on the ground.
  • Options
    bamberbamber Posts: 1,763
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Opinium Observer poll
    CON 36
    LAB 32
    LD 8
    UKIP 13
    GRN 5
  • Options
    Chirpy_ChickenChirpy_Chicken Posts: 1,740
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bamber wrote: »
    Opinium Observer poll
    CON 36
    LAB 32
    LD 8
    UKIP 13
    GRN 5

    Yikes not looking for Labour if that trend continues
  • Options
    MattXfactorMattXfactor Posts: 3,223
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bamber wrote: »
    Opinium Observer poll
    CON 36
    LAB 32
    LD 8
    UKIP 13
    GRN 5

    within moe so im not going to get too excited but i am happy with that poll. How are these numbers compared with opiniums last poll?
  • Options
    bamberbamber Posts: 1,763
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    ENGLAND ONLY shares in latest Opinium poll has
    CON 38
    LAB 32
    LD 9
    UKIP 14
    GRN 6
    A 2.5% CON to LAB swing since 2010
  • Options
    THOMOTHOMO Posts: 7,452
    Forum Member
    Are there any more polls this evening. It's far to soon to go by one poll. Be interesting to see more polls, if there are any tonight or within the next few days. But I thought the Conservatives would eventually increase there lead during the official election campaign.
    Ian.
  • Options
    TelevisionUserTelevisionUser Posts: 41,417
    Forum Member
    THOMO wrote: »
    Are there any more polls this evening. It's far to soon to go by one poll. Be interesting to see more polls, if there are any tonight or within the next few days. But I thought the Conservatives would eventually increase there lead during the official election campaign.
    Ian.

    I'd suggest looking at tonight's Sky News press review at 11.30pm and they should hopefully be covering the latest political developments including the polls.
  • Options
    Jason CJason C Posts: 31,336
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    within moe so im not going to get too excited but i am happy with that poll. How are these numbers compared with opiniums last poll?

    Con =
    Lab -2
    Lib Dem +1
    UKIP +2
    Green -1
    Others =
    THOMO wrote: »
    Are there any more polls this evening. It's far to soon to go by one poll. Be interesting to see more polls, if there are any tonight or within the next few days.

    According to UK Polling Report, ComRes may be coming in at 7.30 and YouGov will be coming in at 9.30.
  • Options
    BoyardBoyard Posts: 5,393
    Forum Member
    Was that poll done before or after the challengers debate?
  • Options
    BoyardBoyard Posts: 5,393
    Forum Member
    Just checked and fieldwork for the Opinium Observer poll took place on Thurs & Fri - so straddled the BBC debate. YouGov, out later, was all after.
  • Options
    marke09marke09 Posts: 12,139
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Some other data from the poll

    England only -
    Con 38
    Lab 32
    LD 9
    UKIP 14
    Grren 6

    Scotland:
    Con 18
    Lab 28
    LD 8
    SNP 40
    UKIP 2
    Greens 3

    Wales
    Con 26
    Lab 37
    LD 6
    Plaid 10
    UKip 17
    Greens 3
    BNP 2 ?????
  • Options
    marke09marke09 Posts: 12,139
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Leader approval ratings

    David Cameron
    Net 0
    England +4
    Scotland -23
    Wales -13

    Ed Miliband
    Net -18
    England -16
    Scotland -33
    Wales -6

    Nick Clegg
    Net -32
    England -29
    Scotland - 51
    Wale s- 42

    Nigel Farrage
    Net -18
    England -16
    Scotland -40
    Wales -13

    so Cameron has a plus ten point approval rating over Ed in Scotland shows Labour is in trouble
  • Options
    AnnsyreAnnsyre Posts: 109,504
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    within moe so im not going to get too excited but i am happy with that poll. How are these numbers compared with opiniums last poll?

    The last debate was a shambles and very bad for Miliband - people could see that Sturgeon would dominate him and any sort of coalition or loose arrangement.

    Farage has not suffered neither has Sturgeon.

    Moral: Avoid TV debates.
  • Options
    marke09marke09 Posts: 12,139
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Latest Opinium poll (16 - 17 Apr):
    CON - 36% (-)
    LAB - 32% (-2)
    UKIP - 13% (+2)
    LDEM - 8% (+1)
    GRN - 5% (-1)
This discussion has been closed.