As most kids I know my own included they tend to look like the dad, I will be more interested seeing Jett when he is about 1 to see who he looks like, of course I also believe there is a good chance Kev will be long gone by then and she would of come clean saying he was a rubbish dad anyway and the real dad didn't want to know but she being the great strong woman she is, raised the kid herself...:rolleyes:
Oh you have just gave her a good excuse for when Kevin is dumped
Not sure what that has to do with FMs questioning who's Jett's Dad?
You said it would affect them if they read about themselves in later life. Am I right?
I think pictures of their mother's porny past would affect them far more.
KP has made a rod for her own back and that of her kids by going on about the 'world famous star' she was dating before she met Kev. Perhaps she needs to shut up, but that'll never happen as long as she can get media mileage out of her life.
As Brighton Bhelle said, it doesn't help her case when the mother goes out with a various selection of men prior to getting pregnant.
Also none of the regular posters here ever questioned Princess or Juniors parentage unlike the infamous "dyeing Princess's hair" claim.
My point has nothing to do with who or how many men KP slept with prior to her getting pregnant.
It is simply the fact that an innocent child's (who will one day be able to read all this) parentage is being questioned.
Also I'm unsure what you mean about Princess's hair & the relevancy of it?
I do love the way she is also happy to talk about the bloke she was going out with JUST prior to Kev in an interview which is meant to be all about her new baby and lovely life with her new hubby.
Must make Kev feel just all warm, loved up and fuzzy inside the way she decided it was o.k to mention that in print and also ok to talk about her ex in the interview.
Not the point. One day both Junior & Jett will have access to what's been written about them.
Admittedly it's not pleasant to be called a show off but not exactly harmful, however, having who your father may or may not be questioned, is.
One day all her kids may see/read stuff about her online her videos interviews etc I feel sorry for them. Does KP not consider that they may get the p*ss ripped out of them at school ?
My point has nothing to do with who or how many men KP slept with prior to her getting pregnant.
It is simply the fact that an innocent child's (who will one day be able to read all this) parentage is being questioned.
Also I'm unsure what you mean about Princess's hair & the relevancy of it?
And the point is that it is the mothers fault this is ever being discussed.
We are not having a dig against little Jett (who looks from the side to be a total cutey!) but each parent must take responsibility of their behavior prior to conception of that child, don't you think?
If it was an ordinary person on the Jeremy Kyle show then they would get exactly the same questions asked that we have. Why go out with so many men and why didn't they put something on it each time until they were sure they were in a stable enough relationship to have a child. Not rocket science and not brain surgery.
Yes you are right. I do think a child reading that their Dad might not be their Father would have a negative effect on them.
Where have I mentioned their Mother's past?
You didn't and I didn't say you had.
I just happen to think that seeing those pictures would be the ruination of a child's mind. After all, in the past she's said she keeps all her cuttings and will let her kids see them when they're old enough.
[QUOTE=Lorise;69068271]Wonder if all the haters who slate her ex for having the kids in his show and in interviews and who used to praise KP for removing the kids from the spot light, come out and slate her for shoving her new born....premature (cough full term cough) baby on the front cover of a magazine after all the fuss she made about saving them from all the damage being in front of cameras does to them...(unless they are earning for her)......:p
No doubt it will be ok for her to do it as she is raising awareness to the dangers of giving birth in a country that cut you open before you are numb....and who don't speak English, plus all the months of drama she had to live through all the while she was saving the life of her baby by herself....but of course Kev the very hands on daddy did the night feeds.......:sleep:
My point has nothing to do with who or how many men KP slept with prior to her getting pregnant.
It is simply the fact that an innocent child's (who will one day be able to read all this) parentage is being questioned.
Also I'm unsure what you mean about Princess's hair & the relevancy of it?
Of course his parentage is being questioned, why wouldn't it be? She was with up to 4 men in the weeks prior to her quickie wedding to Keiron.
[QUOTE=Blue Eyed lady;69069469]My point has nothing to do with who or how many men KP slept with prior to her getting pregnant. It is simply the fact that an innocent child's (who will one day be able to read all this) parentage is being questioned.
Also I'm unsure what you mean about Princess's hair & the relevancy of it?[/QUOTE]
Well, it should have, because that is why the doubts have arisen.
As for children being able to read at a later date things about them and their parents, does this apply to the child of Pete and Emily, and some of the things that you have written about them. Or is it one rule for one and another rule for another.
One day all her kids may see/read stuff about her online her videos interviews etc I feel sorry for them. Does KP not consider that they may get the p*ss ripped out of them at school ?
Yes they may well do & that's such a shame & I do feel sorry for them but again, that is nothing to do with the point I was personally making ie some posters questioning who Jett's Father is won't be very pleasant reading for Jett when he's old enough to do so.
That's all.
was saying her ex gets slated for having his kids in photo shoots and the show (which she did also) and was just saying I hope they slate her too as she stated she was removing all the kids from the cameras as it damages them.....yet here she is selling her new baby for a magazine deal.
Well, it should have, because that is why the doubts have arisen.
As for children being able to read at a later date things about them and their parents, does this apply to the child of Pete and Emily, and some of the things that you have written about them. Or is it one rule for one and another rule for another.
I've written plenty about PA & all justified imo but I have never once mentioned their child.
Yes they may well do & that's such a shame & I do feel sorry for them but again, that is nothing to do with the point I was personally making ie some posters questioning who Jett's Father is won't be very pleasant reading for Jett when he's old enough to do so.
That's all.
If she doesn't want people to speculate she shouldn't be going on the cover of OK! saying
'Why I know Kieran's definitely Jett's father''
'World famous star I was dating before I met Kieran'
I dismissed this as being irrelevant...........
"I think pictures of their mother's porny past would affect them far more".
It's not irrelevant at all. It's part of her past that she says she will let her kids see when they are old enough, presumably effing them up for the rest of their lives.
If she doesn't want people to speculate she shouldn't be going on the cover of OK! saying
'Why I know Kieran's definitely Jett's father''
'World famous star I was dating before I met Kieran'
It's not irrelevant at all. It's part of her past that she says she will let her kids see when they are old enough, presumably effing them up for the rest of their lives.
It's irrelevant to the point I was trying to make.
I do love the way she is also happy to talk about the bloke she was going out with JUST prior to Kev in an interview which is meant to be all about her new baby and lovely life with her new hubby.
Must make Kev feel just all warm, loved up and fuzzy inside the way she decided it was o.k to mention that in print and also ok to talk about her ex in the interview.
It's like she can't help herself.
I think Kev knows exactly what he was employed for....oops mean married for....;)
She never mentions her exes so it must be PA or AR or Leo or Gav or ??????? fault she has done this :rolleyes:
Of course his parentage is being questioned, why wouldn't it be? She was with up to 4 men in the weeks prior to her quickie wedding to Keiron.
And little Jett's mum has made sure everyone in the UK knows she doesn't do contraception.
I would say she enjoys the speculation, hence the front page 'revelation' (wind-up) that she was seeing a megastar around the same time.
Yes they may well do & that's such a shame & I do feel sorry for them but again, that is nothing to do with the point I was personally making ie some posters questioning who Jett's Father is won't be very pleasant reading for Jett when he's old enough to do so.
That's all.
I dismissed this as being irrelevant...........
"I think pictures of their mother's porny past would affect them far more".
Goes without saying, (he's got it on both sides, what with footage of his dad & the flicking baby lotion). Especially bad is the stuff she put out to damage AR. Poor Dolly when she reads that too. There's beginning to be quite the crowd of poor little kids destined for therapy.
And little Jett's mum has made sure everyone in the UK knows she doesn't do contraception.
I would say she enjoys the speculation, hence the front page 'revelation' (wind-up) that she was seeing a megastar around the same time.
It's KP's fault this is even being discussed here, but of course she and her apologists will never admit to that.
Goes without saying, (he's got it on both sides, what with footage of his dad & the flicking baby lotion). Especially bad is thel stuff she put out to damage AR. Poor Dolly when she reads that too. There's beginning to be quite the crowd of poor little kids destined for therapy.
BIB - wow... very very good point.
So we cannot question her behaviour before she got pregnant because an innocent child is involved and he may stumble on old archived threads on DS when he is older but it's ok for her to drag a father through the mud in public without her considering what HIS child may read when she grows up?!
Comments
Oh you have just gave her a good excuse for when Kevin is dumped
You said it would affect them if they read about themselves in later life. Am I right?
I think pictures of their mother's porny past would affect them far more.
KP has made a rod for her own back and that of her kids by going on about the 'world famous star' she was dating before she met Kev. Perhaps she needs to shut up, but that'll never happen as long as she can get media mileage out of her life.
My point has nothing to do with who or how many men KP slept with prior to her getting pregnant.
It is simply the fact that an innocent child's (who will one day be able to read all this) parentage is being questioned.
Also I'm unsure what you mean about Princess's hair & the relevancy of it?
Must make Kev feel just all warm, loved up and fuzzy inside the way she decided it was o.k to mention that in print and also ok to talk about her ex in the interview.
It's like she can't help herself.
Yes you are right. I do think a child reading that their Dad might not be their Father would have a negative effect on them.
Where have I mentioned their Mother's past?
'Why I know Kieran's definitely Jett's father''
'World famous star I was dating before I met Kieran'
If she doesn't want people to speculate, she should put a sock in it.
www.ok.co.uk/celebrity-news/view/69364/Katie-Price-and-Kieran-Hayler-introduce-newborn-baby-exclusive-interview-and-photos/
One day all her kids may see/read stuff about her online her videos interviews etc I feel sorry for them. Does KP not consider that they may get the p*ss ripped out of them at school ?
You dismissed the Mother's past (who she slept with) as irrelevant to your arguement.
And the point is that it is the mothers fault this is ever being discussed.
We are not having a dig against little Jett (who looks from the side to be a total cutey!) but each parent must take responsibility of their behavior prior to conception of that child, don't you think?
If it was an ordinary person on the Jeremy Kyle show then they would get exactly the same questions asked that we have. Why go out with so many men and why didn't they put something on it each time until they were sure they were in a stable enough relationship to have a child. Not rocket science and not brain surgery.
You didn't and I didn't say you had.
I just happen to think that seeing those pictures would be the ruination of a child's mind. After all, in the past she's said she keeps all her cuttings and will let her kids see them when they're old enough.
You are joking?[/QUOTE]
Joking about what bit?
Of course his parentage is being questioned, why wouldn't it be? She was with up to 4 men in the weeks prior to her quickie wedding to Keiron.
It is simply the fact that an innocent child's (who will one day be able to read all this) parentage is being questioned.
Also I'm unsure what you mean about Princess's hair & the relevancy of it?[/QUOTE]
Well, it should have, because that is why the doubts have arisen.
As for children being able to read at a later date things about them and their parents, does this apply to the child of Pete and Emily, and some of the things that you have written about them. Or is it one rule for one and another rule for another.
Joking about what bit?[/QUOTE]
The bolded bits Lorise.
Yes they may well do & that's such a shame & I do feel sorry for them but again, that is nothing to do with the point I was personally making ie some posters questioning who Jett's Father is won't be very pleasant reading for Jett when he's old enough to do so.
That's all.
I dismissed this as being irrelevant...........
"I think pictures of their mother's porny past would affect them far more".
The bolded bits Lorise.[/QUOTE]
oh right sorry ha
No wasn't joking.
was saying her ex gets slated for having his kids in photo shoots and the show (which she did also) and was just saying I hope they slate her too as she stated she was removing all the kids from the cameras as it damages them.....yet here she is selling her new baby for a magazine deal.
I've written plenty about PA & all justified imo but I have never once mentioned their child.
If she doesn't want people to speculate she shouldn't be going on the cover of OK! saying
'Why I know Kieran's definitely Jett's father''
'World famous star I was dating before I met Kieran'
It's not irrelevant at all. It's part of her past that she says she will let her kids see when they are old enough, presumably effing them up for the rest of their lives.
It's irrelevant to the point I was trying to make.
I disagree.
Moving swiftly on......
I think Kev knows exactly what he was employed for....oops mean married for....;)
She never mentions her exes so it must be PA or AR or Leo or Gav or ??????? fault she has done this :rolleyes:
And little Jett's mum has made sure everyone in the UK knows she doesn't do contraception.
I would say she enjoys the speculation, hence the front page 'revelation' (wind-up) that she was seeing a megastar around the same time.
Goes without saying, (he's got it on both sides, what with footage of his dad & the flicking baby lotion). Especially bad is the stuff she put out to damage AR. Poor Dolly when she reads that too. There's beginning to be quite the crowd of poor little kids destined for therapy.
It's KP's fault this is even being discussed here, but of course she and her apologists will never admit to that.
BIB - wow... very very good point.
So we cannot question her behaviour before she got pregnant because an innocent child is involved and he may stumble on old archived threads on DS when he is older but it's ok for her to drag a father through the mud in public without her considering what HIS child may read when she grows up?!
answers on a postcard please.