Options

What is the point of Israel attacking Gaza?

12467332

Comments

  • Options
    James_GrahamJames_Graham Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    PrestonAl wrote: »
    apart from they are not killing anyone. The only people dying here are Palestinians when the Israelis retaliate. So his question is legitimate, why bother at all firing them.

    Are you disappointed Israelis are not dying? it seems many Europeans are a bit dismayed over this.

    Perhaps if you'd bothered to read my post, you'd see the reasons why Israelis are not dying in their hundreds.

    And a country cannot sustain a situation where a third of their population lives in bomb shelters.
  • Options
    QofShebaQofSheba Posts: 43,330
    Forum Member
    If Hamas keep poking a bear eventually it will start to go crazy and destroy everything. There won't be anything left to win if eventually Israel roll over the walls in their tanks and obliterate the place.

    But we have seen what happens when Hamas does not 'poke the bear'.

    Hamas ceased firing rockets for 7 months a few years back, did Israel retreat to the 1967 boarders? Did they even discuss peace? No, they slaughtered a Palestinian family picnicking on a beach. Everyone knows, even the Americans, it is Israel who scupper the peace talks. They want to annex the whole of the West Bank, they want Jerusalem to themselves. This war will not stop until Israel achieves this or until the West say enough is enough.
  • Options
    James_GrahamJames_Graham Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    QofSheba wrote: »

    Hamas ceased firing rockets for 7 months a few years back, did Israel retreat to the 1967 boarders?
    .

    Is this the kind of 'logic' that pro-palestinians' come up with?
  • Options
    James_GrahamJames_Graham Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    'palestinians' admitting that they use human shields with Hamas sending people to rooftops.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eQ6S0-o3uFI

    They claim it's noble and effective.

    Of course they're too stupid to realise that it's only 'effective' because Israel tries to limit civilian casualties.
  • Options
    James_GrahamJames_Graham Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    For a period in ancient history there were Jewish kingdoms, which can, of course, have no meaningful applicability to current times.

    Of course. Like Aboriginals & Native Americans.

    They didn't even have a governing system yet people like you still cry tears for their rights.

    Yet Jews who did have a governing system and ran their state before the Europeans came to steal if from them, don't have any rights.

    I wonder what's behind your hypocrisy? ;-)
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,115
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It's okay, it's self-defence. As a recent Dennis Prager video I saw explained, Israel is a peace-loving nation that has never fired a shot in anger. ;-)
  • Options
    James_GrahamJames_Graham Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    It's okay, it's self-defence. As a recent Dennis Prager video I saw explained, Israel is a peace-loving nation that has never fired a shot in anger. ;-)

    It would take Israel about 100 more years to kill as many Muslims as the British have in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Britain - peace loving nation :)
  • Options
    RecordPlayerRecordPlayer Posts: 22,648
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Flibustier wrote: »

    That is unless you believe the stories in the Bible about Israel being the home of the Jews according to God...

    Even God wasn't happy with them. They were expelled twice from their Promised Land for disobeying Him.
  • Options
    smudges dadsmudges dad Posts: 36,989
    Forum Member
    The Palestinian health ministry said 17 people including five children and three women were killed in the strikes on the house and cafe in Khan Younis.

    Meanwhile, an Israeli military spokesman said an attack on a house in Khan Younis on Tuesday in which eight people were killed was "a tragedy - not what we intended", adding people had returned to the building too soon following a telephone warning

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28241273

    Naughty Palestinians! How dare they be in a house the Israelis are bombing? All the fault of the victims obviously, not the people firing the missiles at houses.
  • Options
    James_GrahamJames_Graham Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    'palestinian' suicide bomber caught

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BsLnuiGCUAALYJR.jpg:large


    These are the people Europeans cheer for.

    Of course they boo and hiss when it happens in Europe.
  • Options
    FlibustierFlibustier Posts: 994
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Al Queda quoted Israel and her actions as being their driving motivation. I think Europe tolerating Israel has encouraged attacks against the west by terrorists.

    First thing that needs to happen is UEFA to block Israel competing within its organisation. UEFA is a golden reward and imo, Israel is not a model asian member.
  • Options
    James_GrahamJames_Graham Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    Flibustier wrote: »
    Al Queda quoted Israel and her actions as being their driving motivation. .

    They also quoted their motivations as being to return the caliphate (which includes parts of Europe) and other global Jihad views like creating Muslims states by conquering African nations.

    I guess you'd quite like to meet their demands. Something tells me you may have common ground with them ;-)
  • Options
    FlibustierFlibustier Posts: 994
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Nope, Bin Laden quoted his biggest motivation as the actions of Israel, didn't mention Europe becoming muslim. Sorry old chap.
  • Options
    Dr. ClawDr. Claw Posts: 7,375
    Forum Member
    Flibustier wrote: »
    Nope, Bin Laden quoted his biggest motivation as the actions of Israel, didn't mention Europe becoming muslim. Sorry old chap.

    and you agree or what with that view from bin laden? if a terrorist cites something as a reason for their actions is that legitimate?
  • Options
    SULLASULLA Posts: 149,789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    Ethel_Fred wrote: »
    And after the dust settles what will have changed?

    You need to explain that to Hamas
  • Options
    James_GrahamJames_Graham Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    SULLA wrote: »
    You need to explain that to Hamas

    Yep. They pull the same shit annually.

    Then cry to the UN/Europe about massacres.

    They're literally firing hundreds of rocket indiscriminately all over Israel and claiming to be the victims when Israel hits back.

    So many useful idiots in Europe peddling their propaganda for them too.
  • Options
    James_GrahamJames_Graham Posts: 259
    Forum Member
    Talking of ownership, want to know how much of the land was owned by Jews at the time of the UN-proposed partition in 1947? 7%. Yes, SEVEN per cent. Kind of blows your argument out of the water.

    What argument? and are you suggesting because Jews owned 7%, that it means 'palestinians' owned 93%?

    Because if you're making that claim then you're very silly indeed :D
    BTW I'm not a 'pro-Palestinian'. I am an unbiased observer who can see through blatant propaganda.

    I'm not convinced :)
  • Options
    BeanybunBeanybun Posts: 3,505
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Why even bother? His trolling has become so blatant at this point that it's clear as day that he isn't even trying now.

    First time I have ever used ignore.

    You guys are hilarious.

    Anyone who turns up on this thread and runs a contrary, reasoned argument to your own is immediately branded a "Zionist", pupppet of the "Zionist state" and ignored. You haven't once properly engaged with the points which "JG" has made, other than to call him out as a "sock puppet".

    Now, I'm prepared to accept he has an agenda and only arrived here when these multiple anti Israeli threads which you're so fond of began to pop up. But even assuming he's a pro Israeli activist, why not engage with him? He's engaged with the (various) pro Palestiian activists who most certainly post here.

    Or are you scared certain of your tired old arguments/libels will be found out?

    Neither side has a monopoly on the truth.
  • Options
    richcleverrichclever Posts: 12,740
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Exactly. You don't get anyone in Syria volunteering to be a human shield.

    Maybe not, but according to Israeli troops you did get the IDF forcing Palestinians to be human shields during Operation Cast Lead among other atrocities. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/israeli-soldiers-reveal-the-brutal-truth-of-gaza-attack-1746485.html
  • Options
    SULLASULLA Posts: 149,789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    Talking of ownership, want to know how much of the land was owned by Jews at the time of the UN-proposed partition in 1947? 7%. Yes, SEVEN per cent. Kind of blows your argument out of the water.

    BTW I'm not a 'pro-Palestinian'. I am an unbiased observer who can see through blatant propaganda.

    At the height of the British Empire, we owned one quarter of the world's land service. Four hundred years earlier we owned nothing outside of the British Isles.

    Throughout history countries have always won land by exploration AND conquest.
  • Options
    smudges dadsmudges dad Posts: 36,989
    Forum Member
    Beanybun wrote: »
    You guys are hilarious.

    Anyone who turns up on this thread and runs a contrary, reasoned argument to your own is immediately branded a "Zionist", pupppet of the "Zionist state" and ignored. You haven't once properly engaged with the points which "JG" has made, other than to call him out as a "sock puppet".

    Now, I'm prepared to accept he has an agenda and only arrived here when these multiple anti Israeli threads which you're so fond of began to pop up. But even assuming he's a pro Israeli activist, why not engage with him? He's engaged with the (various) pro Palestiian activists who most certainly post here.

    Or are you scared certain of your tired old arguments/libels will be found out?

    Neither side has a monopoly on the truth.
    If we put a point up which he can't answer he calls us trolls and puts us on the ignore list. Not really a constructive way to debate, is it?
  • Options
    Fappy_McFapperFappy_McFapper Posts: 1,302
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    "Breeding like Rabbits" was the tipping point for me. Guy is blatantly trolling, looking at his post history.

    http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?p=71698906&highlight=#post71698906

    Trolling 101 right there.
  • Options
    Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    "Breeding like Rabbits" was the tipping point for me. Guy is blatantly trolling, looking at his post history.
    I thought he was referring to the Ultra-orthodox & Settlers
  • Options
    Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    SULLA wrote: »
    At the height of the British Empire, we owned one quarter of the world's land service. Four hundred years earlier we owned nothing outside of the British Isles.
    Less than 70 years, not 400 years
  • Options
    Ethel_FredEthel_Fred Posts: 34,127
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    So any anyone who supports Israel actually answered my question - what is the point of Israel attacking Gaza?

    It's clear it won't weaken Hamas, if anything it will make it stronger, it runs the real risk that Israelis will be killed or injured. And it's certain that the same thing will happen again in a few years time.

    Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity, so if the Israeli government are sane - which is debatable - then it must mean that the Israeli government wants to keep the current situation even if it causes the deaths of Israelis.

    Meanwhile from Haaretz

    Following the kidnapping of three teenaged Israelis in the territories and their murders, Israel wildly arrested some 500 Palestinians, including members of parliament and dozens of freed prisoners who had no connection at all to the kidnapping. The army terrorized the entire West Bank with a dragnet and mass arrests, whose declared aim was “to crush Hamas.” A racist campaign raged on the Internet and led to a Palestinian teenager being burned alive. All this followed Israel’s punitive campaign against the effort to establish a Palestinian unity government that the world was prepared to recognize, its violation of its commitment to release prisoners, a halt of the diplomatic process and a refusal to propose any alternate plan or vision.

    Did we really think the Palestinians would accept all this submissively, obediently, and calmly, and that peace and quiet would continue to prevail in Israel’s cities?

    What exactly were we thinking? That Gaza would live forever in the shadow of Israeli (and Egyptian) caprice, with the restraints sometimes loosened a bit, or sometimes painfully tightened? That the biggest prison in the world would carry on as a prison? That hundreds of thousands of its residents would remain cut off forever? That exports would be blocked and fishing restricted? What exactly are 1.5 million people supposed to live on? Is there anyone who can explain why the blockade, even if partial, of Gaza continues? Can anyone explain why its future is never discussed? Did we think that all this would continue and Gaza would accept it submissively? Anyone who thought so was a victim of dangerous delusions, and now we are all paying the price.

    But please, just don’t act surprised. Just don’t raise hell about the Palestinians raining rockets on Israeli cities for nothing – such luxuries are no longer acceptable. The dread that Israeli citizens are feeling now is no greater that the dread felt by hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who in recent weeks waited in terror for the soldiers to break down their doors and invade their homes in the middle of the night, to search, trash, destroy, humiliate, and then snatch a member of their household. The fear we’re experiencing is no greater that the fear felt by Palestinian children and teens, several of whom were killed needlessly by Israeli Defense Forces fire in recent weeks. The trepidation Israelis feel is certainly less than that felt by Gaza residents, who have no Color Red warnings, no “secure spaces,” and no Iron Dome to save them, only hundreds of scary sorties by the Israel Air Force that end in destruction and the death of innocents, including the elderly, women, and children, who have already been killed during this operation, as it during all its predecessors.

    The operation already has a childish name, “Protective Edge.” But Operation Protective Edge started and will end like all previous operations – giving us no protection and no edge. The media and public opinion want Palestinian blood and destruction, with the center-left supporting this, of course, as it always has at the beginning. But what comes next has already long been written in the chronicles of all the senseless and bloody Gaza operations through the ages. What’s amazing is that from operation to operation, nobody seems to learn anything, and nothing changes except the weapons.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indeed acted with restraint at first, and was duly praised for it – but it was impossible for him to hold back in the face of the Gaza rocket fire. Everyone knows Netanyahu wasn’t interested in this confrontation.

    Is that so? If he really wasn’t interested in it, then he should have seriously pursued diplomatic negotiations. But he didn’t, so it’s clear that he really was interested in confrontation. The headline of his newspaper, Israel Hayom, declared, “Take it to the finish.” But Israel will never achieve the insane “finish” desired by Israel Hayom, certainly not by force.

    “There’s no way to evade punishment for what’s been happening here for almost 50 years,” writer David Grossman told the Israel Conference on Peace this week. That was only a few hours before the next punishment in the series of crimes and punishments landed on Israeli civilians, who are so innocent and blameless. [/quote]
Sign In or Register to comment.