I've not read all the posts on this thread so I'm not sure if this has been mentioned. I couldn't care less what anyone does as long as they are consenting, however the girl is now quite clearly going to be judged on her behaviour now it's out in the press (I was going to say her life has been ruined, but maybe that's a bit far). That is what annoys me about this. We don't know how her parents will react, some people on here say they wouldn't be bothered and some say they'd be ashamed. People will know who she is and not everyone is as non judgemental as people appear to be on here. I remember something like 'Ibiza Uncovered' where 2 consenting adult females went on holiday and had sex with men and lost their jobs when they got home. This is the world we live in, she will be judged and that is what makes me sad.
I'm sad and annoyed, a lot of feelings for first thing in the morning,
How to get in the papers these days : Behave like a stupid **** with no sense of morals or responsibility for anything that you do. After she gets pregnant they will probably need 40 men to take paternity tests
We don't know how her parents will react, some people on here say they wouldn't be bothered and some say they'd be ashamed
Her family have apparently forgiven her already.
She added: “She is a lovely girl but she’s been looking for excitement. She made a terrible mistake a few weeks ago and she has been fully forgiven. Her family love her and will protect her in their faith. But in saying that, everyone is devastated"
I'm he women who are upset by this are the same ones who prattle on about how wonderful bonobo society is, and how it would be better if we were more like that..:D
I said if you've jacked off to any film of a woman giving multiple bjs you were complicit in that act, it was made precisely for men such as yourself, after all..
I wish you had told me this before I watched the clip as I feel a bit guilty now.
What point are you trying to make and how? Your post is confusing and almost seems unrelated to the thread.
Escorts are usually prostitutes, so that point is lost. Yes, it's a legal disclaimer but they still take cash for sex. Most escorts are prostitutes, and that's the bottom line.
I can't see the point of "escorts". Surely a bloke would want to have sex with a prostitute; wash his hands etc.; and then go out for conversation with his male mates?
Prostitutes are also much cheaper and provide certain results than buying a woman dinner, going to a show / concert and not getting a sexual favour.
Though any company advertising that they attract 'top' celebrities such as Arg, Dappy and White Dee is probably telling you the level of class they're aimed at
I can't see the point of "escorts". Surely a bloke would want to have sex with a prostitute; wash his hands etc.; and then go out for conversation with his male mates?
Prostitutes are also much cheaper and provide certain results than buying a woman dinner, going to a show / concert and not getting a sexual favour.
Some men may need an escort for some kind of formal function/work do or something similar. Some men may well just want the company of a woman and nothing more.
Plenty of reasons why a man would hire an escort over a prostitute.
It's possibly because your point is so half-arsed that no-one's getting it. You said:
The lady didn't stick 20+ cocks in her mouth for sexual gratification or to stimulate viewers if her viral video, she did it for a bloody drink (although she may have thought she'd get a holiday). The viewer therefore is not complicit by viewing the clip as she would have done it if no-one filmed it and no-one uploaded it for all and sundry to see.
Women in porn suck off blokes so viewers of their videos can get off on it.
This girl sucked off blokes for a drink.
Please tell me you can seeing the glaring difference between the two.
You're not likely to get my point if you take it out of its original context.
One last time:
I am not saying viewers are complicit in the footage of this girl in Magaluf. I was specifically addressing posters who have judged this girl & called her '****', 'dirtbag'. I pointed out that if they had ever whacked off to porno of a woman in doing similar, they were complicit in a comparable act and therefore had no right to judge the Magaluf girl.
It's double standards to approve an act in one circumstance because it's for your pleasure, and judge the same act in another circumstance because your pleasure is not involved. In either scenario the girl gave bjs for remuneration.
So if I watch a snuff video of a man turning a gun on himself, am I guilty by association of murder? If I watch a CCTV tape of a carjacking, am I due in court for aiding and abetting grand theft auto? If a jury is shown video of an assault or an incident of shoplifting, will they be due on court next because the crime wouldn't have been commited if they weren't going to watch it after the fact? I mean, obviously, if they are watching the act after it has been commited, then it was commited for their amusement, to witness such acts?
If you watch a snuff video and get some personal pleasure from it then you are complicit in the act yes. Guilty by association of murder, no. (Where on earth did you get that from? - there seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between complicit and guilty.)
Footage of crime in general, clearly not. My example was specifically about footage that you personally interacted with - the example was whacking off to porn. You could have worked that out for yourself, no?
You do have to question why the Daily Mail is attempting to juxtapose the events in Magaluf with the working class and the underclass (why mention White Dee)? More divisive moral outage fodder from a hate filled rag.
Comments
Bit bigger than my little finger lol
Adult fun - seriously? It's one of the most immature things I'd ever seen and certainly not the behaviour of what I'd class as adults
I'm sad and annoyed, a lot of feelings for first thing in the morning,
Her family have apparently forgiven her already.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/magaluf-sex-video-parents-girl-3813194#ixzz36aIQLAQ8
I shouldn't laugh but
Maybe they're growers not showers?
I dont think that is how you get pregnant
So it turns out she is Irish and not British.
She'll absolutely hate being "forgiven and loved by all her family".
She should sue the organisers for mis-representation of the "holiday" and £1m associated damages.
Do bald people say that as well?
I wish you had told me this before I watched the clip as I feel a bit guilty now.
What is the moral difference between being a nurse / dentist / hairdresser and a prostitute? All are using parts of their bodies for material gain.
Some are freelance but most use establishments.
Is a woman who has sex before marriage with a hedge fund trader, then stops having sex and divorces him for half his house etc. a prostitute?
Everything between consenting adults is moral.
There is little evidence that prostitutes generally are controlled by manipulative pimps.
Legalise them into tax paying brothels if that is a fear.
I can't see the point of "escorts". Surely a bloke would want to have sex with a prostitute; wash his hands etc.; and then go out for conversation with his male mates?
Prostitutes are also much cheaper and provide certain results than buying a woman dinner, going to a show / concert and not getting a sexual favour.
Yes, no doubt they'' be on edge until this has died down.
Some of them looked bigger than my little finger.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-2681121/Sex-acts-public-drunken-orgies-Carnage-Magalluf-parties-shocking-video-filmed.html
Though any company advertising that they attract 'top' celebrities such as Arg, Dappy and White Dee is probably telling you the level of class they're aimed at
Some men may need an escort for some kind of formal function/work do or something similar. Some men may well just want the company of a woman and nothing more.
Plenty of reasons why a man would hire an escort over a prostitute.
One last time:
I am not saying viewers are complicit in the footage of this girl in Magaluf. I was specifically addressing posters who have judged this girl & called her '****', 'dirtbag'. I pointed out that if they had ever whacked off to porno of a woman in doing similar, they were complicit in a comparable act and therefore had no right to judge the Magaluf girl.
It's double standards to approve an act in one circumstance because it's for your pleasure, and judge the same act in another circumstance because your pleasure is not involved. In either scenario the girl gave bjs for remuneration.
If you watch a snuff video and get some personal pleasure from it then you are complicit in the act yes. Guilty by association of murder, no. (Where on earth did you get that from? - there seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between complicit and guilty.)
Footage of crime in general, clearly not. My example was specifically about footage that you personally interacted with - the example was whacking off to porn. You could have worked that out for yourself, no?
Have you never seen a flaccid penis before?