Options

First Sexy Navy Captain suspended after allegations that she was banging seaman.

15681011

Comments

  • Options
    Bulletguy1Bulletguy1 Posts: 18,429
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jesaya wrote: »
    I already gave you examples of those reasons when you asked for them. As I said in that earlier post, women often do not apply for jobs like this because of the perception they are 'men's work' - and recruiters may not encourage applications from women for the same reasons.

    As there are women foundry workers in other places then unless you are saying there is something demonstrably physically different between those women and British women (please feel free to demonstrate this) then logically the reason why women don't apply for these jobs because of other factors... ie sociological factors.
    Maybe they should try harder then? It is there.......if they want it.

    Making dresses or cooking was always considered 'womens work', yet today most of the top name fashion designers are male. The same with cooking with Gordon Ramsay, Jamie Oliver, and James Martin.

    Wonder why? :confused:

    Probably because they told themselves 'i can do that.....and i will do it even better'. They didn't look for an excuse that 'its womens work' stand in their way. They got on with the job and succeeded.
  • Options
    jjwalesjjwales Posts: 48,572
    Forum Member
    Bulletguy1 wrote: »
    Hhmmm.......all the 'operator' staff in my Colonoscopy department were definitely female.........thank God! Somehow i'm not sure i'd want a bloke firking around up my rear end! :D
    Why? Can't see what difference it would make!
  • Options
    Bulletguy1Bulletguy1 Posts: 18,429
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    JulesF wrote: »
    God almighty, but you're patronising.

    You are not saying the same thing. You are saying that men are naturally more suited to some jobs than women. Which is correct.
    And i've also stated there are some jobs which women are far more suited to, indeed capable of, than men!

    Why don't you pick up on that?! :confused:

    JulesF wrote: »
    Jesaya pointed out that sometimes there are sociological reasons why few women go into a particular field - i.e. it's not always the case that they are not suited to the role, there are historical sociological factors involved when women make career choices. Which is also correct. And is not psychobabble.
    Ok.....whatever you like.
  • Options
    jjwalesjjwales Posts: 48,572
    Forum Member
    Women shouldn't be allowed in such a closed situation. Being surrounded by men for all that time, at sea......it must increase the chance hugely of this type of thing happening...

    It could mean life or death.....an urgent decision for action is needed and they can't find the boss because she's down in the torpedo room straddling the first mates warhead.

    :o

    Now be sensible! How likely is that?
  • Options
    Jason100Jason100 Posts: 17,222
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Isn't he supposed to give her seamen?
  • Options
    Bulletguy1Bulletguy1 Posts: 18,429
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jjwales wrote: »
    Why? Can't see what difference it would make!
    Obviously not to you. :p
  • Options
    RandomSallyRandomSally Posts: 7,072
    Forum Member
    jjwales wrote: »
    Why? Can't see what difference it would make!

    Maybe it's an indicator of his mindset.
  • Options
    Bulletguy1Bulletguy1 Posts: 18,429
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Jason100 wrote: »
    Isn't he supposed to give her seamen?
    She only had one......not a flotilla. :cool:
  • Options
    jrajra Posts: 48,325
    Forum Member
    Bulletguy1 wrote: »
    What is the matter with people when they doggedly refuse to accept basic realities of life? :confused:

    I'm just waiting for you to be labelled a sexist or misogynist for daring to suggest that most of the physically challenging and dangerous jobs are done almost exclusively by men. Ah, hang on, you already have.

    How many people here know of any female fishermen (fisherpeople).

    I remember watching a TV programme a while back about three feminists that were asking why aren't there many (or any) female loggers. So, the premise of the programme was they were 'invited' to do the job for a week and see if they were up to the job. Logging is an extremely dangerous job at the best of times and all three women had to admit afterwards (reluctantly no doubt) they simply weren't up to the job.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logging#Safety_considerations
  • Options
    Bulletguy1Bulletguy1 Posts: 18,429
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Maybe it's an indicator of his mindset.
    Cripes.....psychoanalyse me now. As if being Dyno rodded up the rear entry wasn't enough. :(
  • Options
    jesayajesaya Posts: 35,597
    Forum Member
    Bulletguy1 wrote: »
    Maybe they should try harder then? It is there.......if they want it.

    Making dresses or cooking was always considered 'womens work', yet today most of the top name fashion designers are male. The same with cooking with Gordon Ramsay, Jamie Oliver, and James Martin.

    Wonder why? :confused:

    Probably because they told themselves 'i can do that.....and i will do it even better'. They didn't look for an excuse that 'its womens work' stand in their way. They got on with the job and succeeded.

    I agree that women need to have the confidence to go for roles they may not have considered in the past - and they are... that is why there are women flying fighter planes and driving F1 cars.

    Actually neither cooking or fashion was considered 'woman's work' in the past - I assume you have heard of Worth? He is considered to be the first modern fashion designer... in the 1850s. The first chefs were men as well - Bartolomeo Scappi wrote the first western cookbook when he was chef in the Vatican... in 1577.
  • Options
    jesayajesaya Posts: 35,597
    Forum Member
    jra wrote: »
    I'm just waiting for you to be labelled a sexist or misogynist for daring to suggest that most of the physically challenging and dangerous jobs are done almost exclusively by men. Ah, hang on, you already have.

    How many people here know of any female fishermen (fisher people).

    I remember watching a TV programme a while back about three feminists that were asking why aren't there many (or any) female loggers. So, the premise of the programme was they were 'invited' to do the job for a week and see if they up to the job. Logging is an extremely dangerous job at the best of times and all three women had to admit afterwards (reluctantly no doubt) they simply weren't up to the job.

    Actually he said there were no women working in foundries were because 'women are not up to it'. No 'some' or 'most'.

    There are women who work on fishing boats - I don't personally know any, but then I don't personally know any men who do that job either.

    http://www.alaskajobfinder.com/jobseekers/experts/women-fishing.php

    http://www.jobmonkey.com/alaska/html/special_notes.html
    "It is by no means however, uncommon for women to work on one of these vessels. In fact, there are a growing number of fishing vessels with women skippers..."

    About 3% of European fisherfolk are women.

    http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/documentation/studies/role_of_women/summary_en.pdf
  • Options
    Bulletguy1Bulletguy1 Posts: 18,429
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jra wrote: »
    I'm just waiting for you to be labelled a sexist or misogynist for daring to suggest that most of the physically challenging and dangerous jobs are done almost exclusively by men. Ah, hang on, you already have.

    How many people here know of any female fishermen (fisher people).

    I remember watching a TV programme a while back about three feminists that were asking why aren't there many (or any) female loggers. So, the premise of the programme was they were 'invited' to do the job for a week and see if they up to the job. Logging is an extremely dangerous job at the best of times and all three women had to admit afterwards (reluctantly no doubt) they simply weren't up to the job.
    Yeah i'm kind of used to it now in GD. I think everything has gone kind of wacko now with all this crazy 'gender bending' of job titles. For me a Policeman will always be a bloke with a willy and Woman PC will always be......well, a woman with boobs. Same with Firemen.

    What have they changed manhole covers to now? I suppose some crackpot has dreamt up a wacko name for that too.

    I'm surprised we still have Mandarin oranges on display. :(

    Everywhere has gone quite mad. It's as though the feminist illuminati want the letters 'm a n' annihilated. :confused:
  • Options
    jesayajesaya Posts: 35,597
    Forum Member
    Bulletguy1 wrote: »
    Yeah i'm kind of used to it now in GD. I think everything has gone kind of wacko now with all this crazy 'gender bending' of job titles. For me a Policeman will always be a bloke with a willy and Woman PC will always be......well, a woman with boobs. Same with Firemen.

    What have they changed manhole covers to now? I suppose some crackpot has dreamt up a wacko name for that too.

    I'm surprised we still have Mandarin oranges on display. :(

    Everywhere has gone quite mad. It's as though the feminist illuminati want the letters 'm a n' annihilated. :confused:

    A policeman is a bloke with a willy... a policewoman is a woman with boobs. They are both police officers. Ditto for firefighters.

    Manhole covers are still called manhole covers.

    Mandarin oranges are unlikely to change as the name comes from Sanskrit and means 'advisor'.
  • Options
    Bulletguy1Bulletguy1 Posts: 18,429
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jesaya wrote: »
    I agree that women need to have the confidence to go for roles they may not have considered in the past - and they are... that is why there are women flying fighter planes and driving F1 cars.
    Eh? Must have missed this then. Who is the female in F1? :confused:

    Watched the Hungarian GP and i'd swear blind i never saw any women blasting around the track. :confused:
    jesaya wrote: »
    Actually neither cooking or fashion was considered 'woman's work' in the past - I assume you have heard of Worth? He is considered to be the first modern fashion designer... in the 1850s. The first chefs were men as well - Bartolomeo Scappi wrote the first western cookbook when he was chef in the Vatican... in 1577.
    As kids my sister had a cookery set and apron......i had a Meccano set.

    Anyway.......i think you get my point without going back to the 1850s (how old are you? :confused:).

    Blokes seem to be pretty damn good dressmakers on the designer frock side as do the Ramsay's and Martin's of this current world. They've become millionaires from it so must be doing something right.
  • Options
    jrajra Posts: 48,325
    Forum Member
    jesaya wrote: »
    http://www.jobmonkey.com/alaska/html/special_notes.html
    "It is by no means however, uncommon for women to work on one of these vessels. In fact, there are a growing number of fishing vessels with women skippers..."
    About 3% of European fisherfolk are women.

    http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/documentation/studies/role_of_women/summary_en.pdf

    There is a difference between being a skipper of a fishing boat and actually doing the fishing.
  • Options
    Bulletguy1Bulletguy1 Posts: 18,429
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jesaya wrote: »
    A policeman is a bloke with a willy... a policewoman is a woman with boobs. They are both police officers. Ditto for firefighters.
    Policeman and Policewoman for me as long as they are on the bottom rank. They get to be called Officers when they've climbed a few more rungs up the ladder.

    Firefighters........oh brother. Kind of sounds a bit silly when called out to rescue a cat from a tree or some old dear gets stuck in a lift.
    jesaya wrote: »
    Manhole covers are still called manhole covers.
    Wow......shocking news. :o:o

    That needs 'sorting' then.

    Effluent covers? :p
    jesaya wrote: »
    Mandarin oranges are unlikely to change as the name comes from Sanskrit and means 'advisor'.
    Relieved to hear that hasn't been 'attacked' as it could have become quite confusing.
  • Options
    jesayajesaya Posts: 35,597
    Forum Member
    jra wrote: »
    There is a difference between being a skipper of a fishing boat and actually doing the fishing.

    If you read the article you would see it mentions them crewing as well. Seriously, if I can find that and other articles in a quick google then I am sure you can do the same.
  • Options
    jesayajesaya Posts: 35,597
    Forum Member
    Bulletguy1 wrote: »
    Policeman and Policewoman for me as long as they are on the bottom rank. They get to be called Officers when they've climbed a few more rungs up the ladder.

    Firefighters........oh brother. Kind of sounds a bit silly when called out to rescue a cat from a tree or some old dear gets stuck in a lift.

    Wow......shocking news. :o:o

    That needs 'sorting' then.

    Effluent covers? :p

    Relieved to hear that hasn't been 'attacked' as it could have become quite confusing.

    All police are 'police officers' - it isn't about what you choose to call them, it is what they are.

    I should have thought firefighters was a better term - all sounds rather brave and fearless to me.
  • Options
    jesayajesaya Posts: 35,597
    Forum Member
    Bulletguy1 wrote: »
    Eh? Must have missed this then. Who is the female in F1? :confused:

    Watched the Hungarian GP and i'd swear blind i never saw any women blasting around the track. :confused:

    As kids my sister had a cookery set and apron......i had a Meccano set.

    Anyway.......i think you get my point without going back to the 1850s (how old are you? :confused:).

    Blokes seem to be pretty damn good dressmakers on the designer frock side as do the Ramsay's and Martin's of this current world. They've become millionaires from it so must be doing something right.

    http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2014/6/16009.html

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/28128126

    Four women have already driven in F1 - Susie Wolff is the first in 22 years. She has just started out as a team member so maybe you will have the pleasure of seeing her at some point.

    You said that fashion design and cookery were historically 'women's jobs' so I pointed out to you that historically they are not, so it is hardly surprising that men are still at the top of these professions when the first people in those professions were men.
  • Options
    Bulletguy1Bulletguy1 Posts: 18,429
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jesaya wrote: »
    http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2014/6/16009.html

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/28128126

    Four women have already driven in F1 - Susie Wolff is the first in 22 years. She has just started out as a team member so maybe you will have the pleasure of seeing her at some point.

    You said that fashion design and cookery were historically 'women's jobs' so I pointed out to you that historically they are not, so it is hardly surprising that men are still at the top of these professions when the first people in those professions were men.
    Susie Wolff is a Development driver for Williams which hardly makes her an F1 driver! :o
    She 'took part' in the British GP earlier this year. Now 31 years old her time is fast running out. I saw a documentary about her. From memory i think she has baby making on her mind now. ;-)

    As for the others.....they simply came....and went, almost as quickly as they'd arrived!

    F1 is incredibly demanding both physically and mentally. Few women ever made any note of significance. However all is not 'lost' in your 'cause' and i'm surprised you didn't pick up on this.

    Rallying.......where there was once a notable Rally driver, Michelle Mouton who raced during the late 70's into early 80's. She has the distinction of being the last female professional Rally driver to compete at World Class Rallying.

    There haven't been any since. :(
  • Options
    jesayajesaya Posts: 35,597
    Forum Member
    Bulletguy1 wrote: »
    Susie Wolff is a Development driver for Williams which hardly makes her an F1 driver! :o
    She 'took part' in the British GP earlier this year. Now 31 years old her time is fast running out. I saw a documentary about her. From memory i think she has baby making on her mind now. ;-)

    As for the others.....they simply came....and went, almost as quickly as they'd arrived!

    F1 is incredibly demanding both physically and mentally. Few women ever made any note of significance. However all is not 'lost' in your 'cause' and i'm surprised you didn't pick up on this.

    Rallying.......where there was once a notable Rally driver, Michelle Mouton who raced during the late 70's into early 80's. She has the distinction of being the last female professional Rally driver to compete at World Class Rallying.

    There haven't been any since. :(

    Sweetie, I don't have a 'cause' - I just like accuracy - possibly because I am a scientist and engineer and we are like that. You said there were no women F1 drivers and there are. Now you want to change the argument about how successful they were... a different question. Evidently F1 governing body are hoping that more women will get involved so as they are the experts here then I am going to listen to them. You also said that women were not 'naturally suited' to some jobs and I explained that too.

    I know you want to try and rile the girlies here, but, to use one of my favourite Americanisms, that dog won't hunt.
  • Options
    Regis MagnaeRegis Magnae Posts: 6,810
    Forum Member
    jesaya wrote: »
    http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2014/6/16009.html

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/28128126

    Four women have already driven in F1 - Susie Wolff is the first in 22 years. She has just started out as a team member so maybe you will have the pleasure of seeing her at some point.

    Though she did impress me in the run she did at the German GP, some question whether she got the seat time out of merit considering that she joined the team when her husband was a shareholder in it and she has never had a win in anything else.

    When compared to Alice Powell and Simona de Silvestro, I can see why her getting an opportunity raises eyebrows.
  • Options
    jesayajesaya Posts: 35,597
    Forum Member
    Though she did impress me in the run she did at the German GP, some question whether she got the seat time out of merit considering that she joined the team when her husband was a shareholder in it and she has never had a win in anything else.

    When compared to Alice Powell and Simona de Silvestro, I can see why her getting an opportunity raises eyebrows.

    I can't say I know much about motor racing to be honest - but if being married to or related to someone else in the sport she will be in good company.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_family_relations_in_auto_racing
  • Options
    Bulletguy1Bulletguy1 Posts: 18,429
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jesaya wrote: »
    Sweetie, I don't have a 'cause' - I just like accuracy - possibly because I am a scientist and engineer and we are like that.
    So do i......cutie pie. :p

    God knows what field of science you are in or what you 'engineer', but i just hope your theories are a darn sight more accurate than your statements. :D

    jesaya wrote: »
    You said there were no women F1 drivers and there are.
    There aren't......there were. Past tense....gone......vamooshed. Didn't last long (i'm trying very hard here to avoid saying 'weren't up to it' ;-)).

    Here are all the current competing professional F1 drivers;
    http://www.formula1.com/teams_and_drivers/drivers/

    All seem pretty much male to me unless a transsexual has popped up from somewhere. :confused:

    And here is a list of all who have driven in F1, including your five women (all long disappeared). I think it safe to say that 99.9% of names are all male.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Formula_One_drivers#W


    jesaya wrote: »
    Now you want to change the argument about how successful they were... a different question.
    Already sorted that a few posts before, but just for scientific 'R&D', have obliged again. :cool:
    jesaya wrote: »
    Evidently F1 governing body are hoping that more women will get involved so as they are the experts here then I am going to listen to them. You also said that women were not 'naturally suited' to some jobs and I explained that too.

    I know you want to try and rile the girlies here, but, to use one of my favourite Americanisms, that dog won't hunt.
    BIB.......just don't hold your breath. ;-)

    EDIT; Being in Engineering you may (or may not) have heard of Collins Performance Engineering?
    http://www.collinsperformance.com/

    Not far from where i live, founded and run by Sue Collins, a brilliant engineer specialising in building high performance engines. Sue herself owns half a dozen Ford RS200's and occasionally has a blast around at local race events with one of them.

    However 'Sue' went through most of her engineering life as a bloke. She's transsexual. :cool:
Sign In or Register to comment.