Options

Labour winning the young vote 18/24

Robbedin73Robbedin73 Posts: 7,859
Forum Member
According to ITV News tonight labour are in front in the first time/student vote with the students,and youngsters who believe that the best they can hope for under Dave/George
Is,zero hours /part time work and what's worse under their plans (Tory), they won't be entitled to benefits to help either
Not that your see that in daily heil though
«134

Comments

  • Options
    mooxmoox Posts: 18,880
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Good to see the Labour brainwashing working.

    Especially if they're people who won't vote Lib Dem on tuition fees, but will apparently vote for the party that did a lot more to make tuition fees what they are today (introduced them, increased them when they promised not to, and then commissioned the report that this government used for their increase).
  • Options
    psionicpsionic Posts: 20,188
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Robbedin73 wrote: »
    According to ITV News tonight labour are in front in the first time/student vote with the students,and youngsters who believe that the best they can hope for under Dave/George
    Is,zero hours /part time work and what's worse under their plans (Tory), they won't be entitled to benefits to help either
    Not that your see that in daily heil though

    Haven't Labour always had the majority of the student vote?
  • Options
    oathyoathy Posts: 32,639
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    psionic wrote: »
    Haven't Labour always had the majority of the student vote?

    IMHO that's going to be the Clegg Curse for the Libdems he promised so much went so Over the top and broke all the promises Either Labour or the Greens are going to clean up
  • Options
    Robbedin73Robbedin73 Posts: 7,859
    Forum Member
    moox wrote: »
    Good to see the Labour brainwashing working.

    Especially if they're people who won't vote Lib Dem on tuition fees, but will apparently vote for the party that did a lot more to make tuition fees what they are today (introduced them, increased them when they promised not to, and then commissioned the report that this government used for their increase).


    We coukd always,borrow more in 4 years,than we did previous 13, as pointed out on Question time last night by Hasan
  • Options
    SULLASULLA Posts: 149,789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    psionic wrote: »
    Haven't Labour always had the majority of the student vote?

    Unfortunately Yes. The young are invariably, naive and impressionable.

    Little Ed would probably like to lower the voting age to 12.
  • Options
    SpotSpot Posts: 25,126
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    oathy wrote: »
    IMHO that's going to be the Clegg Curse for the Libdems he promised so much went so Over the top and broke all the promises Either Labour or the Greens are going to clean up

    Far be it from me to defend the Libdems, but isn't that largely down to the fact that people can't quite grasp that they didn't actually win the election. The fact that they are the minority partner in a coalition does not entitle them to implement every policy from their manifesto - particularly when a policy is the opposite of their coalition partners and wasn't even the policy of the the party which came second.

    i really am genuinely amazed at how many people seem to think that the LibDems ever should or could have gone ahead with their tuition fee plans when they didn't win the election, didn't even come second, and it wasn't in the coalition agreement.
  • Options
    SULLASULLA Posts: 149,789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    Spot wrote: »
    Far be it from me to defend the Libdems, but isn't that largely down to the fact that people can't quite grasp that they didn't actually win the election. The fact that they are the minority partner in a coalition does not entitle them to implement every policy from their manifesto - particularly when a policy is the opposite of your coalition partners and wasn't even the policy of the the party which came second.

    i really am genuinely amazed at how many people seem to think that the LibDems ever should or could have gone ahead with their tuition fee plans when they didn't win the election, didn't even come second, and it wasn't in the coalition agreement.

    This government have saved the Country. The Libdems should be thanked, not castigated.
  • Options
    StrictlyEastendStrictlyEastend Posts: 35,455
    Forum Member
    SULLA wrote: »
    Unfortunately Yes. The young are invariably, naive and impressionable.

    Little Ed would probably like to lower the voting age to 12.

    Well it'll be my first time voting this year, I'm 18 and will vote Labour.
  • Options
    StrictlyEastendStrictlyEastend Posts: 35,455
    Forum Member
    SULLA wrote: »
    This government have saved the Country. The Libdems should be thanked, not castigated.

    Well, for lots of ordinary people they haven't.
  • Options
    PrestonAlPrestonAl Posts: 10,342
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Well it'll be my first time voting this year, I'm 18 and will vote Labour.

    point proven?
  • Options
    LyricalisLyricalis Posts: 57,958
    Forum Member
    SULLA wrote: »
    Unfortunately Yes. The young are invariably, naive and impressionable.

    Little Ed would probably like to lower the voting age to 12.

    Yep, which religions have also relied on since humans came up with them.

    Perhaps we should keep the voting age at 18 and raise the age at which people are introduced to religions to that age too? We could then spend the years previous to that helping them develop their critical thinking skills. I think we'd have a much better political system if we did that and fewer fundamentalists.
  • Options
    AndyCopenAndyCopen Posts: 2,213
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Robbedin73 wrote: »
    We coukd always,borrow more in 4 years,than we did previous 13, as pointed out on Question time last night by Hasan

    Yes, because the socialists managed to wipe 25% of the nations GDP
  • Options
    MaxatoriaMaxatoria Posts: 17,980
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Isn't it traditional to vote labour when you have nothing and once you have something you vote tory to keep it?
  • Options
    AnnsyreAnnsyre Posts: 109,504
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    SULLA wrote: »
    This government have saved the Country. The Libdems should be thanked, not castigated.

    Exactly millions are taking home more of the money that they have earned thanks to the LibDems.
  • Options
    StaunchyStaunchy Posts: 10,904
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    PrestonAl wrote: »
    point proven?

    A bit harsh.

    Someone was talking of early indoctrination, I had to fold thousands on Liberal leaflets for Bob-a-job when I was young, it didn't work on me.
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    moox wrote: »
    Good to see the Labour brainwashing working.

    Your contempt for the electorate is repulsive.
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    SULLA wrote: »
    Unfortunately Yes. The young are invariably, naive and impressionable.

    If that were the case they'd fall for the right wing media PR machine, and Tory propaganda blanket that smothers pretty much any noise coming from elsewhere in this country.

    The propaganda and media in this country is seriously weighted toward the right.

    They see right through it though.
  • Options
    AndyCopenAndyCopen Posts: 2,213
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    They probably want free sweeties, drugs and ipods that the SOCTARDS promised them
  • Options
    Jol44Jol44 Posts: 21,048
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The blue rinse hair Tories just don't get it.
  • Options
    plateletplatelet Posts: 26,387
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jol44 wrote: »
    The blue rinse hair Tories just don't get it.

    whereas the pubescent will believe anything
  • Options
    mooxmoox Posts: 18,880
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Jol44 wrote: »
    Your contempt for the electorate is repulsive.

    I am a 20-something and what I said appears to be true. I know a number of people who don't like Clegg because of tuition fees, so they'll vote Labour out of sheer ignorance.

    And no, I am not going to vote for Labour - I'm not that delusional
  • Options
    Robbedin73Robbedin73 Posts: 7,859
    Forum Member
    Thing is dispite the so called good news on rising economy growth , etc there always zero contact hours, NHS , at breaking point , yet there is no clear lead in voting intentions, Tories should be well ahead , there not because people don't like Cameron , true milliband isn't blair, but Cameron ain't Thatcher so who knows,what will happen
  • Options
    J LeninJ Lenin Posts: 3,228
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    SULLA wrote: »
    Unfortunately Yes. The young are invariably, naive and impressionable.

    Little Ed would probably like to lower the voting age to 12.

    Little Ed? What a silly post. Reminds me why I don't get into any debates on these forums anymore.
  • Options
    SpotSpot Posts: 25,126
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    J Lenin wrote: »
    Little Ed? What a silly post. Reminds me why I don't get into any debates on these forums anymore.

    it's just because there are two prominent Labour politicans called Ed. So you have Miliband who is Little Ed, and then there is Ed Balls.....
  • Options
    David TeeDavid Tee Posts: 22,833
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jol44 wrote: »
    Your contempt for the electorate is repulsive.
    Jol44 wrote: »
    The blue rinse hair Tories just don't get it.

    (sigh)
Sign In or Register to comment.