Options
Is Amazon down?
Magic8Ball
Posts: 3,808
Forum Member
✭✭✭
Is Amazon down for everyone else?
I bet it's those wikileaks supporters, I mean, I morally supported them when they were hitting Paypal etc. but taking down Amazon when I am trying to do my Christmas shopping? They're taking it a bit too far now.
Edit:
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/#
Looks like it's not just me.
I bet it's those wikileaks supporters, I mean, I morally supported them when they were hitting Paypal etc. but taking down Amazon when I am trying to do my Christmas shopping? They're taking it a bit too far now.
Edit:
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/#
Looks like it's not just me.
0
Comments
If it is because of wikileaks then "that sounds like good news to me"... will teach those cowards that supported censorship a lesson.
I don't agree with the Mastercard, Visa or Paypal hackings either.
Hackings? Nobody has been hacked at all, it's just a simple DDoS using LOIC.
I agree, the only ones that benefit from it in my opinion are a minority of idiots.
Amazon have every right to choose what they host, these "hacktivists" have no right to bring a website down.
As if the "hacktivists" really have a sense of protest, of all the ones arrested they're just silly teens who need to get laid.
Yes, the battle for freedom of speech is vital... as long as it doesn't affect my Christmas shopping! :rolleyes:
Lots of people have participated in this attack by letting their PCs become bots apparently.
Yet they are still selling the Wikileaks files on site, formatted for their Kindle device. So they're happy to bow down to a little pressure and stop hosting the files, but they're perfectly fine with selling them. Smacks of complete and utter hypocrisy to me.
http://thenextweb.com/uk/2010/12/12/amazon-co-uk-and-de-are-down-is-anonymous-to-blame/
If only there were other companies which sold things online...
I'm not supporting this attack at all but it is funny that people are in favour of something until they find it affects them.
because they're cretins.
Maybe it's just you?
It's entirely logical that the commentary on Wikileaks may be inline with their terms of service but the leaks themselves may not. If commentary on the leaks was illegal, we wouldn't be discussing this now.
Back for me too