Sky's La Liga Rights Expire At End of Season

1679111235

Comments

  • samburrowssamburrows Posts: 1,671
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Rich1977 wrote: »

    Very interesting set of acquisitions and regulatory decisions which created an environment for this:
    Spanish broadband and telecommunications company Telefónica acquired the domestic rights for €600 million for the 2015/16 season.

    Vodafone and Orange were able to acquire the broadcast rights from Telefónica as a result of Telefónica’s recent acquisition of pay-TV operator Canal Plus – which will also broadcast the top two divisions of Spanish league football - the Liga BBVA and Liga Adelante - together with the Copa del Rey for the 2015/16 season. Under the conditions imposed by the National Commission of Markets and Competition (CNMC) on Telefónica’s acquisition, the operator is obliged to open one hundred percent of its "premium" channels and cannot hold exclusivity.

    Thus, Vodafone TV will broadcast ten weekly games from La Liga, including every game featuring Barcelona and Real Madrid. The platform will also show games from the Spanish cup, the Copa del Rey. The Vodafone TV service includes TiVo, fibre-to-the-home, control over the live broadcasts, HD and a system to watch three channels simultaneously.

    Meanwhile Orange TV will broadcast league and cup games at the price of €9.95 per month to Orange customers in HD across multiple devices including smart TV’s, smartphones, tablets and PCs.
  • FusionFuryFusionFury Posts: 14,121
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Rich1977 wrote: »

    Bet Sky fans are gutted. Another reason to cancel !! :D
  • Rich1977Rich1977 Posts: 654
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    FusionFury wrote: »
    Bet Sky fans are gutted. Another reason to cancel !! :D

    We still don't know about UK rights yet
  • samburrowssamburrows Posts: 1,671
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    FusionFury wrote: »
    Bet Sky fans are gutted. Another reason to cancel !! :D

    This is for Spain only.
  • fodg09fodg09 Posts: 3,602
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    With arrangements like this, will Orange and Vodafone just simulcast the Canal Plus/Telefonica coverage or will they have their own production teams etc?

    Edit: Never mind, this article confirms the deals with Vodafone and Orange are wholesale carriage agreements.

    http://www.sportbusiness.com/sport-news/orange-and-vodafone-pick-laliga-rights-tve-nets-highlights-deal
  • mlt11mlt11 Posts: 21,091
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Is that Telefonica price of Euros 600m the total domestic rights value?

    Euros 600m = £420m

    Compares to Sky/BT paying £1,006m under current deal and £1,712m from 2016/17 - and that's just for live rights - ie excludes MOTD, Football First, clips etc.

    Of course would expect PL rights to be much higher but surprised we are talking quadruple (using 16/17 - OK, not direct comparison - but this was a new auction, just done now).
  • samburrowssamburrows Posts: 1,671
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    mlt11 wrote: »
    Is that Telefonica price of Euros 600m the total domestic rights value?

    Euros 600m = £420m

    Compares to Sky/BT paying £1,006m under current deal and £1,712m from 2016/17 - and that's just for live rights - ie excludes MOTD, Football First, clips etc.

    Of course would expect PL rights to be much higher but surprised we are talking quadruple (using 16/17 - OK, not direct comparison - but this was a new auction, just done now).

    Quadruple does seem a large differential. Given the economic situation in Spain, it does seem that the consumer market probably can't bear the kinds of subscription charges which are more affordable in the UK. €9,99 per month for that Orange package of live league and cup games looks like an absolute steal compared to our 'junior' provider which is treble that (in sterling).
  • 1andrew11andrew1 Posts: 4,088
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    pretty sure they said it would be on sky and virgin too. Will be FTA on them i guess?
    BT Showcase is Freeview only. Believe the plan is to make BT Sport Europe FTV for the free matches. No point in BT taking out additional capacity on satellite and cable when it already has channels in place there.
  • 1andrew11andrew1 Posts: 4,088
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Other La Liga deals confirmed in a recent article are:
    Italy: Fox Sports
    Netherlands: Sport 1
    Greece: OTE
    Ten other territories: The agency MP & Silva (Japan, Nordic countries, Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia and Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia.)
    http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2015/07/30/mp-silva-strengthens-relationship-with-laliga/
  • Rich1977Rich1977 Posts: 654
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    1andrew1 wrote: »
    BT Showcase is Freeview only. Believe the plan is to make BT Sport Europe FTV for the free matches. No point in BT taking out additional capacity on satellite and cable when it already has channels in place there.

    Virgin Media are testing a new SD channel right now called BT Extra so could be Showcase or just a channel slot for BT Sport Extra.
  • 1andrew11andrew1 Posts: 4,088
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Rich1977 wrote: »
    Virgin Media are testing a new SD channel right now called BT Extra so could be Showcase or just a channel slot for BT Sport Extra.
    Believe it's a BT Sport red button with more on their way like it.
  • 1andrew11andrew1 Posts: 4,088
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    1andrew1 wrote: »
    Other La Liga deals confirmed in a recent article are:
    Italy: Fox Sports
    Netherlands: Sport 1
    Greece: OTE
    Ten other territories: The agency MP & Silva (Japan, Nordic countries, Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia and Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia.)
    http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2015/07/30/mp-silva-strengthens-relationship-with-laliga/

    I believe that the rights in he Netherlands, Italy and Greece remained with the existing broadcasters so this must give some hope to Sky.
  • Jamesp84Jamesp84 Posts: 31,180
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    FusionFury wrote: »
    Bet Sky fans are gutted. Another reason to cancel !! :D
    Rich1977 wrote: »
    We still don't know about UK rights yet
    samburrows wrote: »
    This is for Spain only.

    :D
    Oops.
  • Rich1977Rich1977 Posts: 654
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Belgium rights just agreed. Such suspense with UK rights, must be any day now

    http://www.sportspromedia.com/news/la_liga_to_belgium_with_eleven_sports_partnership
  • Spiros_RedSpiros_Red Posts: 729
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Advert on Sky short while ago previewing the football this season they'll be showing - Prem league, Football League, Scottish League, Dutch League, MLS, Euro Qualifers, Copa Del Ray

    No mention of La Liga which possibly just means no UK rights holder announced yet rather than Sky having lost it.
  • Stumacher7Stumacher7 Posts: 623
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Apparently Mediapro gave up their domestic rights for Real and Barca in exchange for international rights meaning the new centralised deal comes into effect a year early. So the smaller clubs will benefit. Apart from elche who were demoted despite finishing 13th - their 'crime' was owing money to the wrong 'person' ie the taxman
  • Mr NewshoundMr Newshound Posts: 1,312
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Charles Sale reporting developments of "Sky’s La Liga surrender"

    A further sign that Sky Sports massively overspent in paying £11million a match for their Premier League coverage is the fact they ceded the Spanish football contract to arch-rivals BT Sport without a fight.

    It is understood that Sky made a far bigger first-round offer for La Liga, but were upset enough about the tender going to a second round that they withdrew from a contest BT believed they had no chance of winning.

    With Spanish clubs Barcelona and Real Madrid being such big TV attractions in the English market, cost-cutting after that PL gamble can be the only reason for Sky’s surrender.
  • PaulLFCPaulLFC Posts: 1,290
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Charles Sale reporting developments of "Sky’s La Liga surrender"

    A further sign that Sky Sports massively overspent in paying £11million a match for their Premier League coverage is the fact they ceded the Spanish football contract to arch-rivals BT Sport without a fight.

    It is understood that Sky made a far bigger first-round offer for La Liga, but were upset enough about the tender going to a second round that they withdrew from a contest BT believed they had no chance of winning.

    With Spanish clubs Barcelona and Real Madrid being such big TV attractions in the English market, cost-cutting after that PL gamble can be the only reason for Sky’s surrender.
    I know Sale is posted on here a lot, but I just can't see that happening. As much as La Liga is obviously not in the league of some of Sky's other rights, surely they wouldn't be petty enough to give the rights up entirely? I just don't see that being true. Also seems strange to me the line about BT "believing they had no chance". BT have money. If they wanted it they could submit a competitive bid so that line makes no sense to me. Happy to admit I'm wrong if it does get confirmed that BT have the rights, however.
  • Stumacher7Stumacher7 Posts: 623
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    It seems that La Liga have introduced a minimum 'score' for bids if no bidder reaches the score then they are free to negotiate with bidders to get an argeement. I think that's what's happened but I can't see Sky huffing lie Charles Sales says and leaving a clear field for BT
  • popeye13popeye13 Posts: 8,573
    Forum Member
    I always struggle to believe Sale, he is 99% BS.
    No way does Sky walk away from La Liga rights tender, just no!
  • PaulLFCPaulLFC Posts: 1,290
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Article is here for those wondering: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-3181748/Edgbaston-s-electric-Ashes-atmosphere-lead-Birmingham-hosting-Great-Britain-s-Davis-Cup-semi-final.html

    Seems very sure of himself in the way that's written. It's contradictory though - says Sky made a "far higher offer" in round 1 but then withdrew "which can only be down to cost-cutting" - so which one is it?

    Either way if there's any truth in this, should we expect an announcement tomorrow? Would be a nice way for BT to launch BT Sport Europe, that's for sure.
  • mlt11mlt11 Posts: 21,091
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Sale takes a lot of stick on DS but when he says something has actually happened (as distinct from what may happen in the future) then it is highly likely that he is right.

    I doubt Sky would have walked away as in reducing their offer allowing BT to win with a lower bid but it's entirely possible Sky would not increase their original offer and BT then subsequently outbid them.
  • PaulLFCPaulLFC Posts: 1,290
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    mlt11 wrote: »
    Sale takes a lot of stick on DS but when he says something has actually happened (as distinct from what may happen in the future) then it is highly likely that he is right.

    I doubt Sky would have walked away as in reducing their offer allowing BT to win with a lower bid but it's entirely possible Sky would not increase their original offer and BT then subsequently outbid them.
    That would certainly be believable, but he seems to be saying that Sky got angry at the bidding going to a second round and walked away entirely. That I find difficult to believe, but the way the article has been written, he does seem very certain.

    The next few days will be interesting leading up to the announcement, that's for sure.
  • mlt11mlt11 Posts: 21,091
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    PaulLFC wrote: »
    That would certainly be believable, but he seems to be saying that Sky got angry at the bidding going to a second round and walked away entirely. That I find difficult to believe, but the way the article has been written, he does seem very certain.

    The next few days will be interesting leading up to the announcement, that's for sure.

    He does say Sky "withdrew" but it's entirely possible they could have withdrawn after BT had made a bid higher than Sky's original bid.

    Without knowing the precise ins and outs we'll never know.

    However I agree it would be very surprising if Sky had allowed BT to ultimately win with a bid lower than Sky's original bid - but I doubt that is what has actually happened as it would make no sense.

    And indeed Sale doesn't actually say that BT won with a bid lower than Sky's original bid - Sale's article would not actually be inconsistent with the position being as per the first paragraph of this post.
  • ReadingfanReadingfan Posts: 10,250
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I think Sale is often right when reporting as fact rather than speculation, even if he's often wrong on the specific reasons why!
Sign In or Register to comment.