They should BOTH have been hired!

Comments

• fleet Posts: 11,574

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  19/12/10 - 22:46 #2

  Hes just more or less offered him a job!

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 865

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  19/12/10 - 22:46 #3

  I agree but would he then not have to lower the wages to afford both?

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 2,129

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  19/12/10 - 22:46 #4

  Umm why would he hire both contestants from the weakest final in years?

  0
• MARTYM8 Posts: 44,710

  Forum Member

  ✭

  19/12/10 - 22:47 #5

  The winner is just for the show - only one person can win.
  
  Sugar can hire all the candidates if he wants to afterwards - just like Cowell gives more than one record contract out to the acts in the Xfactor (not just the winner)

  0
• TCD1975 Posts: 3,039

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  19/12/10 - 22:56 #6

  Honolulula wrote: »

  Umm why would he hire both contestants from the weakest final in years?

  
  Have to disagree. I'd say it was the strongest final they've had. Two good contestants who both did an excellent job in the final task given the amount of time they had to come up with a new drink, bottle, poster campaign, advert and pitch.
  
  Stella was particuarly strong throughout the series and was a very deserving winner.

  0
• [Deleted User] Posts: 2,361

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  19/12/10 - 23:00 #7

  Why would you want to work with Chris, the most boring man on earth?

  0
• robot1000 Posts: 2,164

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  19/12/10 - 23:00 #8

  Having 2 winners takes away from the whole part of the Apprentice.
  
  I recall that on the US edition, the male winner had the choice as to whether the female runner up was also given the job, but decided against it. I feel that have 2 winners takes away from being the focus of attention from being Sugar's apprentice

  0