itv programme on michael shields last night
[Deleted User]
Posts: 93
Forum Member
✭
possibly the most one-sided bit of programming i have ever seen.
so basically i'm supposed to believe that michael shields is innocent because a retired copper who wants to make a name for himself says so. funny how he was dubious of almost everything that happened in the 'bulgarian' trial, but
took everything the 'english' man said at face value.
funny how the victim in this case has been ignored, isn't his welfare the most important.
p.s.
if michael is released do you think they'll be a campaign to find out who the real culprit is? do you think they'll be a petition and a documentary on it?
answers on a postcard.
so basically i'm supposed to believe that michael shields is innocent because a retired copper who wants to make a name for himself says so. funny how he was dubious of almost everything that happened in the 'bulgarian' trial, but
took everything the 'english' man said at face value.
funny how the victim in this case has been ignored, isn't his welfare the most important.
p.s.
if michael is released do you think they'll be a campaign to find out who the real culprit is? do you think they'll be a petition and a documentary on it?
answers on a postcard.
0
Comments
I think the welfare of a victim of crime and also someone falsely accused of a crime who might spend his life (or good part of it) in prison is almost equal actually
go on convince me. all i hear in shields' defence are tittle tattle and half truths. i would be grateful if you could supply me concrete evidence of these "travesties of justice".
if it was bulgarian languishing in an english prison, then no-one would care would they?
Only three of them did- with totally conflicting reports if what he had supposedly done ion the attack. This is the only evidence in the trial against him. They did not even bother to take the stone thrown at the victim and analyse for even the simplest, easiest evidence to find and link to the real attacker of the crime- this is absolutely amateur work.
Not accepting 4 people as saying they were an alibi to confirm he was asleep in bed-where police found him as they barged in- and only when they had gone to room next door- hadn’t found guy they were looking for there - so burst into this room clearly wanting to arrest someone so thought Shields would do.
Not accepting the statement of a man who has come forward and confessed to the crime and actually fits picture of the man witnesses described!!
I’m sorry to say: these are not ‘half truths’- they are what happened by many peoples account and the Bulgarian police have not denied this in any way.
The fact is- if a Bulgarian was in a UK prison he would not have suffered the series of blunders Shields had in getting there- as we luckily have strict guidelines of as with ID parades and court procedures- which meant if certain things had happened as with Shields i.e. police stopping at recent scene of crime with defendant in the back in handcuffs- id parade etc- the case would have actually been thrown out and many officers fired as a result.