David Witts aka Joey Branning said in an Interview with Gay magazine Attitude said he would not mind if Joey started to question his sexuality - Witts said it was unlikely but if it did happen- he may be a catch for Danny.
Considering that the Chryed saga already subjected us relentlessly to a cringy imitation of the heterosexual script, I sincerely hope that Danny will represent another type of gay identity and lifestyle (ruthless, flirtatious, promiscuous...)
I kind of sort of hope it's a woman, just to see your reaction, Vaslav.
But really I hope it's a character not on screen at the minute. And I'm with Salome: I want to see Danny be mad manipulative and villainous and promiscuous. Like a string of blokes leaving his house/flat (at least once an episode) and Danny walking down the street high-five-ing everyone.
And I'm with Salome: I want to see Danny be mad manipulative and villainous and promiscuous. Like a string of blokes leaving his house/flat (at least once an episode) and Danny walking down the street high-five-ing everyone.
This is how I envision him too. Love the last bit.
Comments
I am not a fan of Joey though.
LOL :D. Why Rik Waller?
Want to see friendship/business with Janine, she would make a great hag for him and they could be very devious together!
And you know that 100% do you
But really I hope it's a character not on screen at the minute. And I'm with Salome: I want to see Danny be mad manipulative and villainous and promiscuous. Like a string of blokes leaving his house/flat (at least once an episode) and Danny walking down the street high-five-ing everyone.
This is how I envision him too. Love the last bit.
I hope its a new character definately not Joey Branning.
Where you heard that Vaslav me old mate?
My money is on Patrick or Billy.
I think it might be Tyler though.
He'll shag Danny the night before the wedding and then be all confused.
Actually, that has FanFiction written all over it!
I dont think it will be anybody currently on the Square unless they are closeted.
Steven Beale could be earmarked for a return down the line I think.