Options
Chantelle Tagoe & her orphanage visit..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1288197/Township-chic--WAG-Chanel-visits-poverty-stricken-orphans-Cape-Town.html
Do you feel she was dressed inapproriately? or do you think the DAILYMAIL is being unfairly harsh commenting on her in this manner?
I think seeing as shes kept to doing what she promised she would after her visit for a documentary last year and raised 12,000 for this orphanage so far, she can wear what the hell she likes. Maybe a bit over the top with the chanel belt and hat but shes covered up not flashing boobs or legs etc...
Maybe a pair of jeans and a t shirt might have been more appropriate but she wants her own parents to be proud of what shes doing and maybe just wanted to look nice when they saw the pics?
What do you think? maybe not the best choice of clothing but at least her hearts in the right place.
I believe the other WAGS involved have also continued with their fund raising efforts as well.
Do you feel she was dressed inapproriately? or do you think the DAILYMAIL is being unfairly harsh commenting on her in this manner?
I think seeing as shes kept to doing what she promised she would after her visit for a documentary last year and raised 12,000 for this orphanage so far, she can wear what the hell she likes. Maybe a bit over the top with the chanel belt and hat but shes covered up not flashing boobs or legs etc...
Maybe a pair of jeans and a t shirt might have been more appropriate but she wants her own parents to be proud of what shes doing and maybe just wanted to look nice when they saw the pics?
What do you think? maybe not the best choice of clothing but at least her hearts in the right place.
I believe the other WAGS involved have also continued with their fund raising efforts as well.
0
Comments
Because she helped build it i think http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/news/a219464/wags-film-bbc-south-africa-documentary.html?rssearlier this year in a documentary with other wags about south africa.
I bet if she spends more than £12k in shoes alone !
but what if she does? shes at least giving SOMETHING back?
are we being too harsh because we're jealous of the money these women have to spend? (i know i am jealous) or should we be grateful for the fact that they are doing SOMETHING?
But is she giving something back or is it her partners money she is giving. What I mean is, if she was not with a footballer would she still be able to give as much with what she earns, would the papers be interested, I very much doubt it. And to be honest I do think she should have dressed down a bit, as all she has done is confirm what a lot of people think about a Wag, more money than sense, rightly or wrongly.
The money she raised off her own back i think, and i suppose to play devils adovate we could say it wasnt anything to do with emile but then, she wouldnt have been out there in the first place.. and probably wouldnt have had the contacts to raise the 12k, she could have just not bothered and got on with her shopping sprees i guess but i think maybe we should give a little credit where its due instead of whining about everything all the time you know?
Well no she probably wouldn't be able to give back as much if she wasn't engaged to Emile Heskey, but so what? If they are getting married then why shouldn't she use some of their money to help other people?
I am not whining, I was just stating an opinion.
I didnt state you were?
It was a GENERAL statement about the dailymail article. i,e, generally whining about people better off than us..i didnt say YOU i said WE as in the general "we".
Were did I say she should not use his money, it is just my opinion.
OK, YOU have made your point, I will keep MY opinion to myself and let you get on with it.
yeah im not trying to argue with you or anything i just didnt see why it was relevant?
I doubt very much she wore it for her parents benefit, i'm sure they would have been proud whatever she wore, IMO i think it looks tacky.
Im trying to state it was a GENERAL comment about everyone me, you, everyone reading the daily mail article and commenting on it, there really isnt any need to take offence and none was intended
She will get more "respect" from me if she turns down the £9K goody bag and even more if she refuse to go to the party all together.
iArent the goody bags gifts from the sponsers for the good work theyve done? or are they just a bribe to get them there
she could accept it then auction it off on ebay and give the proceeds to the orphanage?
No i wouldnt prefer all they did was shop.. this was what i actually said..
It was my thread and you didnt quote anyone
so i assumed you were talking to me no need to be rude.
Stop assuming. But more to the point if you're unable to handle differing views on your(:rolleyes:) thread(s), do not start one. Simple.:yawn: