Gillian? 51? You are kidding?
whitewitch
Posts: 1,922 Forum Member
✭✭✭
I cannot believe she is only 51. she looks well into her 60's. i saw it on wiki and was astounded.
when you think she is only 3 months older than nigella lawson.
if that is what eating hemp and seeds does, i would rather eat nigella's buttery, sweet and gorgeous food.
quite clearly....gillian.....you are what you eat!!!!
when you think she is only 3 months older than nigella lawson.
if that is what eating hemp and seeds does, i would rather eat nigella's buttery, sweet and gorgeous food.
quite clearly....gillian.....you are what you eat!!!!
0
Comments
a dried prune?
Bring on the chocs, roast dinners and alcohol. i am doing it for my beauty
He! He!
I'm joining you
i wouldn't have been shocked if she was 70. i would have thought, well she doesn't look too bad, must be the healthy diet. but to look worse than your average 51 year old.....unbelievable.
what has she been doing to herself.....she must have had a hard life.
:eek::eek:
I must say I thought she was much older than 51 as well.
That sounds like a really awful episode of Ready Steady Cook.
And a heaped dessert of fake qualifications.
I was thinking an old trout :eek:
Wait a minute, no she isn't.
Her career has been in the toilet since Ben Goldacre outed her "qualifications".
Hurray for calories.
And Gillians skin is urgh. It looks like somthing from the jungle.
So anybody who you consider to old is not worthy of listning to? :rolleyes:
Sounds very ageist to me, and I have more time for older peoples views, people who have lived than young people who often don't know their born!
Don't know about you, but if someone dispensing health advice looks like a wreck themselves, I'm unlikely to heed it. Nothing to do with age - more overall health and general appearance. If she was 70, I'd say she looked ok; but for 51 she looks scary - end of.
Can't believe that needed spelling out, but hey.:yawn:
What's the story on her being outed as a fraud?