Options
Suits, S5, Mondays at 10pm on Dave [NO SPOILERS]
carl.waring
Posts: 35,713 Forum Member
✭
In case you didn't know already 
So Donna's not actually leaving the company; just PA for Louis instead of Harvey. I wonder for how long though.
DRAMA: Suits
On: Dave
Date: Monday 10th August 2015 (starting in 12 days)
Time: 22:00 to 23:00 (1 hour long)
Denial. Series 5, episode 1.
The snazzy legal drama returns! It's a sad time for Harvey as Donna quits to work for Louis, but Mike and Rachel are in a happier mood as they toast their engagement.
(New Series, Widescreen, 2011, 5 Star)
Starring: Patrick J. Adams, Gabriel Macht, Gina Torres, Rick Hoffman, Meghan Markle, Sarah Rafferty
Excerpt taken from DigiGuide | Copyright (c) GipsyMedia Limited.
So Donna's not actually leaving the company; just PA for Louis instead of Harvey. I wonder for how long though.
0
Comments
Some of the episodes can get a bit sweary (lots of shits and bastards) so do Dave cut the episodes at all?
Dave show the show at 10pm so have no reason to cut and language, especially with what other shows get away with such as Alan Davies: As Yet Untitled.
Me too.
I'm hoping we haven't already seen the best of this.
The "Mike didn't Go To Harvard," scenario has been used so many times in different episodes, I think there must be few people left now in New York who still think he did.
The "will they won't they?" situation between Mike and Rachel I thought was more interesting than since they became a couple, shades of "It is better to travel hopefully than to arrive?"
Now Donna is going to work for Louis, I suspect that's going to be milked a bit.
I preferred it when each episode was a self-contained story. But I will still be recording this.
Looking forward to watching this tomorrow night. (Been out tonight!)
Donna going Harvey really went to pieces, I think poor Rachel will be there for a while.
Same here in fact more often than not she is the only cast that irritate me the most.^_^
Still very happy this show is back.
However, it's getting like The West Wing for me. I love the show but sometimes the legal stuff is a bit confusing (as was the political stuff in TWW) so I just gloss over that and enjoy the rest of it!
I noticed that.
I wasn't that impressed with the first episode.
Harvey having "panic attacks?" so out of character, still I s'ppose it's necessary to drag out the Donna situation.
For me, this has gone from, "must watch," to "record and watch it later," in the space of a series.
Surely the difference is that the political stuff in TWW actually made sense (nearly all of the time, anyway) whereas the legal stuff in Suits makes no sense most of the time and they try to gloss over it quickly so viewers won't notice.
The "get me the file" stuff amuses me.
If you've ever been in a solicitor's office and seen the size of files of big companies it makes you laugh when you see Rachel or Donna with "the file" which seems about as thick as a telly mag. But it's just a TV drama.
It was nice to see "Wynn Duffy" from Justified. I assume we will be seeing him again a few times in the next few episodes.
They get around don't they?
"Daniel Hardman" turned up recently as a "number" in an episode of "Person of Interest."
As we're only one episode in so far I don't know how you come to that conclusion
Exactly. So why bother mentioning it as it's completely irrelevant!
That confused me a little too
You're at it again.
You're the one who bangs on about this board is for "discussions," but that's not what you do.
Read your own post, you're dismissing people's opinions.
Why did I mention "files?" because I found it amusing.
A reaction that seems to permanently escape you.
As I've said elsewhere tonight "lighten up."
You obviously won't need me to tell you on which other threads I've passed an opinion today, as you've already found three to do your nit-picking.
"Bless. "
Please note my use of "seems" and "but we'll see....". :cool:
Err..
That was conveniently ignored when you got a snippy response.
But that's just par for the course, with those multiple nit-picking replies (not that you asked for one).
I think you must have been put in the same category as myself. "Not allowed to comment on an observation, or add something you think is amusing."
It's only telly, some can't accept that.