John Hurts entrance !

colinpostcolinpost Posts: 103
Forum Member
The entrance in the last few minutes was on par with the greatest and most dramatic cinema media - Orsen Wells in 'The Third Man' - a third of the way in the film!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeJVNQ4ngfo

Comments

  • HappyTruckerHappyTrucker Posts: 534
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    OK, this is getting silly now. In the last 15 hours or so we've had thread titles of:

    "Will we get a Graham Norton insertion tonight" and "John Hurt's Entrance". I've had more tea coming down my nose than actually swallowed :eek::eek::D:D

    More on topic though: I liked the reveal but could have done without the forced credit stamped over the still playing action. Although I accept it was to - hopefully - stop people speculating that maybe he isn't really The Doctor. Looking at some threads here, it seems that failed ;)
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,174
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    OK, this is getting silly now. In the last 15 hours or so we've had thread titles of:

    "Will we get a Graham Norton insertion tonight" and "John Hurt's Entrance". I've had more tea coming down my nose than actually swallowed :eek::eek::D:D

    More on topic though: I liked the reveal but could have done without the forced credit stamped over the still playing action. Although I accept it was to - hopefully - stop people speculating that maybe he isn't really The Doctor. Looking at some threads here, it seems that failed ;)

    haha.

    Yesterday it was custard today its a cup of tea with me !! :D
  • mirrorman74mirrorman74 Posts: 337
    Forum Member
    More on topic though: I liked the reveal but could have done without the forced credit stamped over the still playing action.

    I understood why they did it, but like yourself, I didn't agree with doing it onscreen during the narrative. Particularly when the end credits showed character name and actor less than a minute later.

    It reminded me of some video games that introduce a new character with an onscreen/midplay credit.
  • sandydunesandydune Posts: 10,986
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    He looked like another Doctor from the back .:confused:
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 631
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Lol it wern't that great people are getting carried away. Good cliffhanger though. The credit thing was really odd lol I'm sure not it worked, it just looked odd. It reminded me of tarratino and the B movie style credits. Maybe Hurt asked for the credit?
  • RosstorWhoRosstorWho Posts: 42
    Forum Member
    My mind is in the gutter today...
  • AlrightmateAlrightmate Posts: 73,120
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    OK, this is getting silly now. In the last 15 hours or so we've had thread titles of:

    "Will we get a Graham Norton insertion tonight" and "John Hurt's Entrance". I've had more tea coming down my nose than actually swallowed :eek::eek::D:D

    More on topic though: I liked the reveal but could have done without the forced credit stamped over the still playing action. Although I accept it was to - hopefully - stop people speculating that maybe he isn't really The Doctor. Looking at some threads here, it seems that failed ;)

    I thought it was that aspect of it that was great.
    Without the credit stamp I don't think it would have been even half the scene that it was.

    There's no "Is that...is that John Hurt? He looks different from how I saw him last", no "Well is he The Doctor or not, Matt Smith says no, not by name, then what?".

    Honestly, I think if you took the credit stamp out of it with the accompanying sound effect it would be nothing and have much less dramatic impact.

    It was brave I thought too. Because too many film makers would be afraid to try that approach out of fear that it might look cheesy. Undoubtedly to some it probably did anyway.
    But Steven Moffat has shown before on Sherlock how he isn't afraid to play with people's preconceptions when they see text on screen. If anybody can make a scene like this work which might look cheesy done by most other people, I think Steven Moffat can.

    Just imagine it without the credit stamp and sound effect. It would be wimpy in comparison.
    I think it's a trade off with trying to not make it look too corny, but also maximizing its dramatic impact.

    I wish that somebody would try to do a reworking of the scene without the text and sound effect so people could see a side by side comparison.
    I think if you saw such a reworking of it I'm convinced that you'd change your view. But I do think that it's something you'd actually have to see rather than just take my word for it.

    I don't think it would work with every type of television drama, but as Doctor Who is almost a high budget B-Movie type show I think it worked really well on this. In fact incredibly well.
  • DiscoPDiscoP Posts: 5,931
    Forum Member
    I chuckled when I saw John Hurt's name appear, because the way it was presented, the words 'Introducing John Hurt' appeared before 'as the Doctor'. At first I thought that the Doctor Who production team were claiming that they've just discovered this new actor called John Hurt :)
  • Dr. LinusDr. Linus Posts: 6,445
    Forum Member
    I thought the on-screen credit was a little cheesy and strange, but I do understand why they did it - for the cliffhanger to work it had to be very clear to the viewer that not only is it the legendary actor John Hurt on screen, but that his character is indeed the Doctor. If you manage to miss either of these things the cliffhanger loses some of its power, so I think it was understandable to do that.
  • kaob82kaob82 Posts: 276
    Forum Member
    DiscoP wrote: »
    I chuckled when I saw John Hurt's name appear, because the way it was presented, the words 'Introducing John Hurt' appeared before 'as the Doctor'. At first I thought that the Doctor Who production team were claiming that they've just discovered this new actor called John Hurt :)

    Ooh this made me lol, his voice is so recognisable but I started thinking of the dragon in Merlin as soon as he spoke! I liked the introduction ,it did give it impact and least it confirms who he is and we don't have 6 months of people debating is he the doctor or not.
  • AlrightmateAlrightmate Posts: 73,120
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    kaob82 wrote: »
    Ooh this made me lol, his voice is so recognisable but I started thinking of the dragon in Merlin as soon as he spoke! I liked the introduction ,it did give it impact and least it confirms who he is and we don't have 6 months of people debating is he the doctor or not.

    It was a shame that he spoke though. Because I think with many that would have given the game away before he turned around and the title appeared.
    Because John Hurt is an actor who does have one of those voices that can be immediately identifiable as the voice of John Hurt.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 631
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Nah the credit stamp was awful and really jarring. The scene worked well without it
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 631
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Lol your saying the credit was an idiot tag? Nah the dialogue alone was enough, Maybe John Hurt asked for a gigantic screen credit
  • Dennis CDennis C Posts: 1,715
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    snopaelic wrote: »
    Lol it wern't that great people are getting carried away. Good cliffhanger though. The credit thing was really odd lol I'm sure not it worked, it just looked odd. It reminded me of tarratino and the B movie style credits. Maybe Hurt asked for the credit?
    Dr. Linus wrote: »
    I thought the on-screen credit was a little cheesy and strange, but I do understand why they did it - for the cliffhanger to work it had to be very clear to the viewer that not only is it the legendary actor John Hurt on screen, but that his character is indeed the Doctor. If you manage to miss either of these things the cliffhanger loses some of its power, so I think it was understandable to do that.
    snopaelic wrote: »
    Nah the credit stamp was awful and really jarring. The scene worked well without it

    Had to be there, to drive the point home to the idiots, er sorry, viewers who turn over to BGT the moment the credtis start to roll. These people despite having variable taste, deserve to know who this Stranger is
  • eugenespeedeugenespeed Posts: 66,695
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I'm actually glad of the John Hurt credit, as until it popped on I thought it was Roger Lloyd-Pack!
  • AlrightmateAlrightmate Posts: 73,120
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    snopaelic wrote: »
    Nah the credit stamp was awful and really jarring. The scene worked well without it

    How could you possibly know unless you've seen the scene without it?

    I mean right until the credits roll?
    I don't think that would have worked.
  • mikey1980mikey1980 Posts: 3,647
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    snopaelic wrote: »
    Lol your saying the credit was an idiot tag? Nah the dialogue alone was enough, Maybe John Hurt asked for a gigantic screen credit

    The dialogue clearly wouldn't have been enough. For a start, Matt Smith's Doctor says that Hurt is him, but not the doctor; the credits on screen actually go much further than that and set*up a real mystery.

    And secondly, even with the on-screen credits, some people still seem convincwe that Hurt isn't truly 'The Doctor' - imagine what it would be like if there had been no credit onscreen?
  • PrimalIcePrimalIce Posts: 2,897
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    How could you possibly know unless you've seen the scene without it?

    By imagining it? :confused:

    Personally I thought it was awful, like some family guy spoof cut away. I have no idea what they were thinking.
Sign In or Register to comment.