Slightly disappointing in that I thought this was going to be a stand alone debate but some people are using their speeches for all sorts of other subjects so there's no flow to the debate..........
I don't think it's a case of the PM 'allowing it'............I don't think hes in charge of the proceedure of the House
Just like he's not in charge of the Tory party..............
Well, there doesnt appear to be a tory party any more.
There's a bunch of people that are just pandering to whatever seems popular at the minute without forethought or care at the consequences to the nation, because it may keep them in a job in 18 months.
They are showing politicians for what they are, self aggrandising blow hards who will say and do anything to keep money and power , people who say what they think is wanted to be heard, not people who have a beleif in anything, other than their own prosperity.
Well, there doesnt appear to be a tory party any more.
There's a bunch of people that are just pandering to whatever seems popular at the minute without forethought or care at the consequences to the nation, because it may keep them in a job in 18 months.
They are showing politicians for what they are, self aggrandising blow hards who will say and do anything to keep money and power , people who say what they think is wanted to be heard, not people who have a beleif in anything, other than their own prosperity.
Now debating EU Referendum amendment to Queens Speech!
er no - actually this is the Queen's Speech debate - the amendments are voted on later in the session (around 7:00pm) first amendment G will be voted on - then amendment b - and then the whole thing is voted on either changed or unchanged.
Now debating EU Referendum amendment to Queens Speech!
er no - actually this is the Queen's Speech debate - the amendments are voted on later in the session (around 7:00pm) first amendment G will be voted on - then amendment b - and then the whole thing is voted on either changed or unchanged.
Comments
Probably all waiting for the shepherds to round them up into their appropriate flocks. Bbaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh.
Any thread with EU referendum in the title would do it. There's plenty about.
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1826394&page=4
There's one - there is at least one other on the opening page, and several on page 2.
It's hardly breaking news...
The idea of live action at Westminster sounds ever so slightly oxymoronic.
When was the last time that the PM allowed his own backbenchers to discuss a motion amending his very own Queens Speech ?
I don't think it's a case of the PM 'allowing it'............I don't think hes in charge of the proceedure of the House
Just like he's not in charge of the Tory party..............
Well, there doesnt appear to be a tory party any more.
There's a bunch of people that are just pandering to whatever seems popular at the minute without forethought or care at the consequences to the nation, because it may keep them in a job in 18 months.
They are showing politicians for what they are, self aggrandising blow hards who will say and do anything to keep money and power , people who say what they think is wanted to be heard, not people who have a beleif in anything, other than their own prosperity.
The labour lot are, of course, no better.
Amen to all of that.
Whose Moggy?:)
er no - actually this is the Queen's Speech debate - the amendments are voted on later in the session (around 7:00pm) first amendment G will be voted on - then amendment b - and then the whole thing is voted on either changed or unchanged.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmagenda/ob130515.htm
Live action? Don't you mean ****ers asleep on the backbenches?
Jacob Rees-Mogg. Wisest mp in Parliament. Famed for saying council officials who issue on-the-spot fines should wear bowler hats.
It's live on beeb anyway. If you aren't interested, I'm told there are other threads.
Did Michael Gove just tweet you?