my opinion is that "the violence came from both sides on the night" so the article is indeed the best account of events to give, its called presenting a balanced viewpoint, unlike the poor wee scottish nationalists/ big bad unionist dishonesty you often read about on here
Except the attackers were almost uniformally from the unionist camp and it was them that started the violence.
Lol I take it you were one of the thugs chasing young girls shouting abuse at them, no wonder you want to defend that action. You should be ashamed of yourself
i admire your childish attempts at provocation but at no point was i in george square in the days preceeeding and following the referendum, you sound like you were there though, did you smash the window and shout abuse at the car with the union flag in it? perhaps you were the guy with the scotland flag on his face who got arrested in the square? or course according to you this couldnt have happened as it was all the big bad unionists fault :cool:
Except the attackers were almost uniformally from the unionist camp and it was them that started the violence.
not according to the news reports available which state both sides were responsable and the violence started after both sides wound each other up, the various videos available also show this, the pictures also show this, your bias is clearly apparent
i admire your childish attempts at provocation but at no point was i in george square in the days preceeeding and following the referendum, you sound like you were there though, did you smash the window and shout abuse at the car with the union flag in it? perhaps you were the guy with the scotland flag on his face who got arrested in the square? or course according to you this couldnt have happened as it was all the big bad unionists fault :cool:
No I watched the unionist thugs attacking youngsters and giving nazi salutes in video footage but I am not trying to defend the indefensible , you are.
which they had every right to do, the sqaure is not the exclusive property of scottish nationalists and the logical thing would have been for the scottish nationalists to let someone else have a go of it when they lost the vote, however this did not happen and violence ensued due to both sides goading each other, both sides were equally responsible, the no voters who arrived in the square were also celebrating being scottish, just like i did also after the referendum vote was won
Rubbish, it was Unionist thugs like you see at Ibrox that caused the mayhem. That is a matter of record.
not according to the news reports available which state both sides were responsable and the violence started after both sides wound each other up, the various videos available also show this, the pictures also show this, your bias is clearly apparent
The footage clearly showed the unionists attacking a peaceful pro independence rally. It is a matter of visual record.
Comments
Except the attackers were almost uniformally from the unionist camp and it was them that started the violence.
You do not know how people who did not vote would have voted if they had voted. You can only count the votes cast. Do do anything else is idiocy
i admire your childish attempts at provocation but at no point was i in george square in the days preceeeding and following the referendum, you sound like you were there though, did you smash the window and shout abuse at the car with the union flag in it? perhaps you were the guy with the scotland flag on his face who got arrested in the square? or course according to you this couldnt have happened as it was all the big bad unionists fault :cool:
only 38% of people who could vote cared enough about the issue to turn up and vote for independence, do you dispute this?
not according to the news reports available which state both sides were responsable and the violence started after both sides wound each other up, the various videos available also show this, the pictures also show this, your bias is clearly apparent
.. and Sìol nan Gàidheal does not exist, and it's membership has not been increasing..
No I watched the unionist thugs attacking youngsters and giving nazi salutes in video footage but I am not trying to defend the indefensible , you are.
Lol the people who did not vote did not care enough about saving the union to turn up and vote. Do you dispute this?
Rubbish, it was Unionist thugs like you see at Ibrox that caused the mayhem. That is a matter of record.
What has this to do with the discussion.?
Looks like he will!
The footage clearly showed the unionists attacking a peaceful pro independence rally. It is a matter of visual record.
If you are, your a liar!
Your use of the term 'young women' is laughable to, it is a pathetic attempt to make those who you deem to be 'victims' seem more victimised.
They're a group who aren't unionist thugs, so is that why they shouldn't be mentioned?
Who are they and who have they attacked, en mass, in a public place?
Why, how would you describe young women?
So a 16 year old and her 20 year old sister are not young women. Wow , strange world you live in DustBuster
its not, but if thats what you need to hear keep telling yourself that
nope, the footage shows two sides fighting with each other, thats a matter of visual record
a young woman was in the car that was attacked by independence supporters, strange word you live in too
A fine upstanding yes-man like yourself doesn't know of them? This lot-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11079296/Anti-English-racists-terrorising-the-No-campaign-in-Scotland.html
I saw people being attacked by thugs and attempting to defend themselves. Thugs waving union jacks
Is there corroborating evidence of that?