The Daily Pwice

16667697172200

Comments

  • BadcatBadcat Posts: 3,684
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    What the hell happened to this thread??

    Can we PLEASE get back to having a laugh about "what Katie did next for mauw publicity"??!

    Pretty please?
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    I disagree. It was to highlight KP the struggling mummy,which is a nonsense.

    .. and so is PA the amazing single handed daddy - clue in that one is, you never see the nannies on camera. Hmm wonder why :rolleyes:
  • whatever54whatever54 Posts: 6,456
    Forum Member
    Badcat wrote: »
    What the hell happened to this thread??

    Can we PLEASE get back to having a laugh about "what Katie did next for mauw publicity"??!

    Pretty please?

    She's getting married in the morning, I wonder how she is spending this evening? Cuddled up with Kevin or cosy night in with the girls
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,301
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Tomorrow's wedding my predictions... pink... sparkly... orange... horses... vows of this is the one... pledges of everlasting love... small children carrying rings and flowers... pouting and posing


    Anybody else?

    Lol I reckon Kevin will wear the pink horse outfit!She will give it he is the one etc etc and the Leo tattoo will be on show!
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    I don't need to watch it. I know the Pwicey & nothing she does is for others only. It's all about her.

    Like taking her kids out of the public domain to protect them when one was obviously having trouble coping with it?

    Shame Pete couldn't do that, but he wouldn't have got another series :cool:
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Badcat wrote: »
    What the hell happened to this thread??

    Can we PLEASE get back to having a laugh about "what Katie did next for mauw publicity"??!

    Pretty please?

    I'm surprised she hasn't caught celebrity bahhh-pollllarrrr at some point - it does tend to be quite contagious. :o
  • BadcatBadcat Posts: 3,684
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    whatever54 wrote: »
    She's getting married in the morning, I wonder how she is spending this evening? Cuddled up with Kevin or cosy night in with the girls

    I'm thinking she has been slowly dipped in a HUGE vat of warm wax up to her top lip to ensure she is completely fluff free for the day.

    Followed by a jolly good sandpapering.

    Then maybe a rub down by some furniture polishers so she has a nice even deep dark oak finish to show off her lovely white off the hip wedding gown?
  • BadcatBadcat Posts: 3,684
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    MRS W wrote: »
    Lol I reckon Kevin will wear the pink horse outfit!She will give it he is the one etc etc and the Leo tattoo will be on show!

    I'm betting her horse will poo out the rings to order.
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Kay2000 wrote: »
    So Pete thought it would be a great career move, for him to latch on to someone that was being torn apart by the UK press, yes, i can see the logic in that. great career move :D

    To be fair Kay, theres never been a heck of a lot of logic in CP's PR strategies - you open a shop, you go on Alan Titchmarsh and if your lucky you get to enter a house for a few weeks live on tv surrounded by people less nutty than her.

    :o
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Badcat wrote: »
    and *coughs* she has had pics of her kids taken VERY recently for her latest bonkers horse outfit promotion so we can stop mud slinging about that now.

    Now i would be the first one to slam the Pwicey for that .. but actually if you look at those photos it does look very much the kids have just run onto set - they certainly arent posed.

    I have a feeling they werent meant to be photographed.
  • lozengerlozenger Posts: 4,881
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Badcat wrote: »
    What the hell happened to this thread??

    Can we PLEASE get back to having a laugh about "what Katie did next for mauw publicity"??!

    Pretty please?

    I'm with you Badcat - I'm totally befuddled and lost, havent caught up with the last 10 pages - but anyway:-

    Here are the wedding guests on the beach tomorrow:-

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2299497/Weston-super-mare-sand-castle-festival-Hollywood-themed-sand-sculptures-crafted-annual-beach-festival.html
  • fifitrixibellefifitrixibelle Posts: 3,834
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Like taking her kids out of the public domain to protect them when one was obviously having trouble coping with it?

    Shame Pete couldn't do that, but he wouldn't have got another series :cool:

    But she hasn't taken Harvey out of it has she ;) and what a ridiculous point to try and score considering the festering skank trollies random men into their homes before these kids heads have stopped spinning from the last one.
    And why??? to fill her vacuous t.v shows and get her plastic mug in the press...just how many more 'weddings' and strangers will these children be subject to before they have even turned double figures??
    Ludicrous point.
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    .. and so is PA the amazing single handed daddy - clue in that one is, you never see the nannies on camera. Hmm wonder why :rolleyes:

    I've never seen KP's nannies on camera either.;)
    And ?

    Harvey goes there on Court instructed visitation which PA fought tooth & nail for & the deal was H MUST have a specialist nurse/nanny quite apart from any other help PA has.
    As someone hinting inner knowledge on this you really aren't up to speed on the situation. Do keep up there's a good chap .;)
  • Betty BritainBetty Britain Posts: 13,721
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    whatever54 wrote: »
    She's getting married in the morning, I wonder how she is spending this evening? Cuddled up with Kevin or cosy night in with the girls

    She is waxing her tash...Her legs and arm pits.. Same as every bride I assume ...oh and putting rollers in her wigs
  • Betty BritainBetty Britain Posts: 13,721
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    I've never seen KP's nannies on camera either.;)
    And ?

    Harvey goes there on Court instructed visitation which PA fought tooth & nail for & the deal was H MUST have a specialist nurse/nanny quite apart from any other help PA has.
    As someone hinting inner knowledge on this you really aren't up to speed on the situation. Do keep up there's a good chap .;)

    Janna .. Please give the confrontation a rest.. And Harvey can not be ordered by court to visit Peter as he isn't his genetic father and isn't named on his birth cert .. He has no parental rights over Harvey
  • whatever54whatever54 Posts: 6,456
    Forum Member
    But she hasn't taken Harvey out of it has she ;) and what a ridiculous point to try and score considering the festering skank trollies random men into their homes before these kids heads have stopped spinning from the last one.
    And why??? to fill her vacuous t.v shows and get her plastic mug in the press...just how many more 'weddings' and strangers will these children be subject to before they have even turned double figures??
    Ludicrous point.

    that and dressing up in front of him as that lurid pink pony, I'd struggle to cope with that, very confusing
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Like taking her kids out of the public domain to protect them when one was obviously having trouble coping with it?

    Shame Pete couldn't do that, but he wouldn't have got another series :cool:

    Well none of them appeared fazed by the cameras & crowds at her horsey stunt. Happy & fine & not bothered in the least would cover it.
    So another of your theories bites the dust.
    Oh dear.....Not having much luck with you theories are you ?
  • fifitrixibellefifitrixibelle Posts: 3,834
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    No it was about a vile joke being said about her son and the fact if it had been about his race there would of been a massive public outcry ..
    Where do you get your idiotic idea she wants to be the poster girl for disabled mothers?

    Oh the irony
  • Betty BritainBetty Britain Posts: 13,721
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Oh the irony

    Sadly it's true ...
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    I have no clue WHO she represents other than PA. And the only reason I know that is from newspaper reports on feuds/KP etc & the TWITTER baldy-Nev meltdown.

    So you sing her praises as a "strong woman" but have no idea of her background and achievements?

    Absolutely bizarre. i think maybe you have a selective memory :rolleyes:
  • BadcatBadcat Posts: 3,684
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Now i would be the first one to slam the Pwicey for that .. but actually if you look at those photos it does look very much the kids have just run onto set - they certainly arent posed.

    I have a feeling they werent meant to be photographed.

    If they were not meant to photographed she would not have let them out on the photo shoot and would have given instructions for no pictures being printed.



    But I digress............... back to the wedding!!!

    what's the betting the guests will have to wear certain colours?
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    Well none of them appeared fazed by the cameras & crowds at her horsey stunt. Happy & fine & not bothered in the least would cover it.
    So another of your theories bites the dust.
    Oh dear.....Not having much luck with you theories are you ?

    PROOF

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1333014/Katie-Price-announces-plans-withdraw-Junior-Princess-public-eye.html

    Do you actually have ANY idea about these people Janna? It's looking less and less so
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Janna .. Please give the confrontation a rest.. And Harvey can not be ordered by court to visit Peter as he isn't his genetic father and isn't named on his birth cert .. He has no parental rights over Harvey
    Wrong again. PA fought for access & got it DESPITE not being the bio dad.Even the Courts saw that PA was the man H regarded as daddy ,so made the right decision on access .
    KP fought it to the max & lost. Harvey visits & KP can do diddly squat without ending up in contempt of court.:)
  • Betty BritainBetty Britain Posts: 13,721
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Like taking her kids out of the public domain to protect them when one was obviously having trouble coping with it?
    l:

    You didn't mean Harvey did you?
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Badcat wrote: »
    If they were not meant to photographed she would not have let them out on the photo shoot and would have given instructions for no pictures being printed.



    But I digress............... back to the wedding!!!

    what's the betting the guests will have to wear certain colours?

    Possibly, but then wouldnt there have been a few posed photos with her? I know what you mean, but something seems a bit odd about it.
This discussion has been closed.