Love stars for their eyes but you know it will be celebrities, ITV dont do stuff with normal people, they think we just want to see celebrities on everything they make.
Exactly itv have proven that when they brought back family fortunes and mr and mrs. ITV should explain why they havent got time for ordinary members of the public when making these shows
Exactly itv have proven that when they brought back family fortunes and mr and mrs. ITV should explain why they havent got time for ordinary members of the public when making these shows
I think the boneheads who decide these things think we are as obsessed with celebrities as they are..
Exactly itv have proven that when they brought back family fortunes and mr and mrs. ITV should explain why they havent got time for ordinary members of the public when making these shows
Too many 'celebrities' not enough work, it seems that anyone who has appeared on TV once is a 'celebrity', that we should all know, can't remember how many times I've asked who? and why?
The appeal of Matthew Kelly was that although he told 'jokes' he actually took the show very seriously. Harry Hill could only host it in a silly fashion and can't see that working.
The itv revival machine is bringing back shows that served them well. But one gripe that i have is that some of the shows mentioned are purely celeb mr and mrs and family fortunes to name two. Harry hill isnt the man to front stars in their eyes. Paddy mcguinness would be a good host
I would have liked itv to bring back
winner takes all
price is right
321
wheel of fortune
blind date
take your pick
the people versus
"Harry Hill's 3-2-1" would be good.
So this is what you selected tonight, "You'll need this to drop the kids off at the pool, and don't forget that the Azaleas need dusting to avoid cross-border contamination"
"Drop the kids of at the pool, could that be the car?"
"Dust the Azaleas, is that some kind of reference to Dusty Bin?"
"Cross-border, maybe a holiday in Mexico?"
"Non of those, you've won this complete toilet and brush set in solid faux mahogany!!!"
If it returns it needs to be with ordinary members of the public and not celebrities. I think Harry would do a good job and I would imagine the production values will be a lot better too. It doesn't have to be "turned into a comedy" but by the same token it shouldn't take itself too seriously either, it should be a fun show.
Plus I don't think Keith could be much worse than the dumbed down versions with Cat Deely.
Nothing is worse than Keith Lemon/Leigh Franics, not even Cat Deely. Although I did find her era of the show totally unwatchable after being used to proper presenters like Leslie and Matthew. It was like watching the work experience kid at play when Cat Deely was on.
I loved Stars In Their Eyes and I do miss it. I would love it if it was brought back, but as said in above posts, it would probably be with stupid celebrities and that is something I do not want to see (the celebrity specials they did were always dreadful). Nor do I think Harry Hill would be a great presenter for the show. At the moment, I am not sure there is anybody capable of presenting the show (nobody who could be as good as Matthew Kelley was).
Comments
I think the boneheads who decide these things think we are as obsessed with celebrities as they are..
Too many 'celebrities' not enough work, it seems that anyone who has appeared on TV once is a 'celebrity', that we should all know, can't remember how many times I've asked who? and why?
I remember one when they dressed someone up as Axel Rose in a long ginger wig and a kilt. The poor guy looked mortified.
Towards the end, it was airing over more than 20 weekends of the year, with the kids version following on and celebrity specials.
Plus the show used to have judges for the finals with Lesley Crowther as host. Sally Whittaker was a judge.
Plus I don't think Keith could be much worse than the dumbed down versions with Cat Deely.
Same old regurgitated rubbish is seldom successful and can't see this offering being any better than any other tedious revivals.
Yawn.
When the singing is good I appreciate it
When the singing is bad,its great comedy
"Harry Hill's 3-2-1" would be good.
So this is what you selected tonight, "You'll need this to drop the kids off at the pool, and don't forget that the Azaleas need dusting to avoid cross-border contamination"
"Drop the kids of at the pool, could that be the car?"
"Dust the Azaleas, is that some kind of reference to Dusty Bin?"
"Cross-border, maybe a holiday in Mexico?"
"Non of those, you've won this complete toilet and brush set in solid faux mahogany!!!"
I tried youtubing that.
No joy.
If you love Axl though, give this one a try. Amazing!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkVqmGZTi8c
Nothing is worse than Keith Lemon/Leigh Franics, not even Cat Deely. Although I did find her era of the show totally unwatchable after being used to proper presenters like Leslie and Matthew. It was like watching the work experience kid at play when Cat Deely was on.