Voice your opinion now (if you want to)
Spoiling ballot papers, protest voting etc on June 4th, whilst seeming to be a good idea, will not directly effect the target of all the frustration and downright anger we all have for Westminister Politicians.
Obviously there will be no General Election called by Labour, particularly when they are at such a low point in opinion polls.
If (like me) you feel the need to still register your opinion now (and not in 12 months time) there is a petition requesting that HM, dissolve parliament without delay.
http://www.gopetition.co.uk/petitions/the-queen-to-dissolve-parliament-and-call-a-general-election.html
Yeah, I know it will not achieve much, but hey ho, you might feel better in yourself....................I did.
Binnman
Obviously there will be no General Election called by Labour, particularly when they are at such a low point in opinion polls.
If (like me) you feel the need to still register your opinion now (and not in 12 months time) there is a petition requesting that HM, dissolve parliament without delay.
http://www.gopetition.co.uk/petitions/the-queen-to-dissolve-parliament-and-call-a-general-election.html
Yeah, I know it will not achieve much, but hey ho, you might feel better in yourself....................I did.
Binnman
0
Comments
If it meant someone new and fresh, a change, yea I'd be up for it.
As it stands it just a desperate tactic to get a party in on the back of something they are equally as guilty as doing.
That is not democracy and shame on any Tories wanting it that way.
Get in power on idears, and promises.
May I take this opportunity, to quote a phrase you have used several times tonight;
Binnman
Yes, because opinion polls have shown this issue to be favourable to the Tories over the government. Sadly that is the way the public work.
There is only one reason why you are asking for an election off the back of this - it is because the Tories have benefited.
For the good of the country we need something fresh, not a party voted in off the back of something they did themselves.
You know it's true.
All you do is try put all the emphasis of his problems on the expenses row now rather than the fact he is plain useless as an PM.
Brown has had the skids under him a long time but to you it appears better to say all parties are to blame now for Brown's uselessness, which they aren't.
Yes all parties are to blame for the expenses scandal, but they are not all to blame for the disaster Brown has been both as a chancellor and a PM. Even his own MPs can see that they want to get shot of Mr Incompetent and who can blame them he is leading them out of a job.
Leaving the expenses issue out of it for a moment that still does not make Brown's position any better. He is just not a leader either of this country or his party.
The world must be laughing at him especially over that Mr Smiley Clown Youtube video what an embarrasment that was to his party and more importantly to this country. The Queen must have seen it and cringed.
I've said it once before, but I'll repeat it just for you young Labour Lad;
As long as my arse points South I will not vote Tory
Binnman
I hope he doesn't do that weird grin on the campaign trail (if he doesn't stop in his bunker, that is). It scares me so God knows what it'll do to the kids!
Next time Brown appears on Sky TV before the watershed they are going to have it pin protected like they do the films in case he does scare the kiddies.
. . . . . and Brown has the charisma of the arse end of a panto horse.
At least Cameron can make decisions and lead as I said someone else is dragging Brown around behind him like that part of a panto horse
He's not done anything so far, he's already got issues with Boris and Clarke banging on his door...
Standing in front of a TV camera, once in 3 years, and talking a load of empty stuff is not "leading".
Just because the Telegraph says it is, doesn't mean it is.
Tory MP's will have to face the public as well, surely it's right that the people should decide who is trustworthy and who is a complete git.
The sad thing is if Brown came out fighting he would destroy Cameron for the poor man`s Lord Snooty he is.
As I said Binnman, if this action meant the election of a new fresh party not involved in all this junk: I would be behind you.
As it stands it just means the election of a stale old alternative who have had their snouts in the trough also.
We need parties that represent the country truthfully.
We need a stricter line on immigration, a tougher line with the EU, the rolling back of the surveillance state, quango/fake charity/focus group bonfires and the reinstatement of genuine democracy at all levels of government including some form of PR. I'm sure any competent party with this on its manifesto would win by a landslide - whether left or right.
Or alternatively, Brown could lumber around the ring like something out of an old silent comedy, swinging haymakers that were going full circle to connect with his own head, and Cameron could watch being counted out on the canvass without even having had to get off his stool.
That's more in line with how this particular fight has been shaping up.
However, like the other two, its reactionary, for something he knew was going on for years, and its taken his speech writers a week to come up with a good stance on the subject.
As for the general election. I suspect we will get one in september. They will anounce it after the June 4th polls.
And no, it isnt in Labour's interest, but I also do not think they have much choice. Apart from anything, the speaker is determined to stay until the next election and it would be extremely difficult to remove him, an early election would also solve that problem, although , again, he would be rewarded with around £100K of taxpayers money in parachute payments.
Indeed it does my Irish friend...................the clue is in my location.
Binnman
Wrong. A significant protest vote or deliberately spoiled ballots is all these people understand.
The epitition is little more valid than one of those newspaper premium rate Yes/No telephone polls.