Most likely a covert job by CIA or special forces on the ground. Quite clever not only does it show that you don't need to get into a fight to take some of them out, it will also make the rest paranoid about what they eat from now on.
If you bothered to read the article, you will see it refers to the other reported incident in November. Something similar has apparently happened again, recently. Is that clear enough ?
The question is, have some Kurds managed to infiltrate their base disgusted as chefs? Have they escaped safely? How have they managed to pull this off twice in one year, if the reports are true?
I do apologise, the Daily Wail has that effect on me.
The Syrian rebels are almost entirely made up of ISIS extremists and I doubt they'd kill their own so we can rule out rebels as a major suspect. It looks more like a special forces attack, we know that America and Britain have boots on the ground (covert ones) so I'd be more leaning towards them. That's not to say I disagree with them taking action like this and I in fact support it as it's a good effective way to kill ISIS fighters without getting into an actual firefight with them.
The Syrian rebels are almost entirely made up of ISIS extremists and I doubt they'd kill their own so we can rule out rebels as a major suspect. It looks more like a special forces attack, we know that America and Britain have boots on the ground (covert ones) so I'd be more leaning towards them. That's not to say I disagree with them taking action like this and I in fact support it as it's a good effective way to kill ISIS fighters without getting into an actual firefight with them.
I agree about this method. The Free Syrian Army refused to join the US coalition, their aim was to topple Assad, but they were also fighting IS.
The Syrian rebels are almost entirely made up of ISIS extremists and I doubt they'd kill their own so we can rule out rebels as a major suspect. It looks more like a special forces attack, we know that America and Britain have boots on the ground (covert ones) so I'd be more leaning towards them. That's not to say I disagree with them taking action like this and I in fact support it as it's a good effective way to kill ISIS fighters without getting into an actual firefight with them.[/QUOTE]
It's also a way of creating mistrust and paranoia within ISIS as it would have to be someone close to them with access to the food.
The Syrian rebels are almost entirely made up of ISIS extremists and I doubt they'd kill their own so we can rule out rebels as a major suspect. It looks more like a special forces attack, we know that America and Britain have boots on the ground (covert ones) so I'd be more leaning towards them. That's not to say I disagree with them taking action like this and I in fact support it as it's a good effective way to kill ISIS fighters without getting into an actual firefight with them.[/QUOTE]
It's also a way of creating mistrust and paranoia within ISIS as it would have to be someone close to them with access to the food.
if it saves our armed forces i am all for it let them kill each other trying to find out who the traitor is they will be less of them for us to worry about
if it saves our armed forces i am all for it let them kill each other trying to find out who the traitor is they will be less of them for us to worry about
Correct by doing it this way not only do we kill them but we make them suspicious about each other and that can really disrupt their operation.
Comments
That's what killed them. Bacon butties.
I do apologise, the Daily Wail has that effect on me.
If it was deliberate there isn't any suggestion of who did it. I think there are countless subjugated people who could be responsible, in their midst. Infiltration wouldn't be a necessity. The Free Syrian Army Militants were supposed to be responsible for Novembers incident, if it was true.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/07/08/report-45-isis-fighters-killed-by-poisoned-ramadan-meal/
They went to Alan's Snackbar instead.
You would probably catch Islamophobia by watching 'Family Guy' these days.
It might be what killed the IS fighters.
The Syrian rebels are almost entirely made up of ISIS extremists and I doubt they'd kill their own so we can rule out rebels as a major suspect. It looks more like a special forces attack, we know that America and Britain have boots on the ground (covert ones) so I'd be more leaning towards them. That's not to say I disagree with them taking action like this and I in fact support it as it's a good effective way to kill ISIS fighters without getting into an actual firefight with them.
I agree about this method. The Free Syrian Army refused to join the US coalition, their aim was to topple Assad, but they were also fighting IS.
http://www.ibtimes.com/four-years-later-free-syrian-army-has-collapsed-1847116
Correct by doing it this way not only do we kill them but we make them suspicious about each other and that can really disrupt their operation.
Very good
They had their revenge