The Hobbit gets panned by this critic

Comments

• Options

  [Deleted User] Posts: 411

  Forum Member

  ✭

  10/12/12 - 11:56 #2

  no real need to dedicate a thread to this is there. Why not just add it to the general Hobbit thread.

  0
• Options

  Dai13371 Posts: 8,071

  Forum Member

  ✭

  10/12/12 - 12:15 #3

  Nobody forced this critic to watch in it 48fps.

  0
• Options

  [Deleted User] Posts: 444

  Forum Member

  ✭

  10/12/12 - 13:05 #4

  Dai13371 wrote: »

  Nobody forced this critic to watch in it 48fps.

  
  I didn't realise there was a choice?

  0
• Options

  Delboy219 Posts: 3,193

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  10/12/12 - 16:51 #5

  The screening he was given was probably the 48fps as PJ is trying to push it.
  
  I imagine he didn't have a choice at the time. But us punters will very soon.

  0
• Options

  Dai13371 Posts: 8,071

  Forum Member

  ✭

  11/12/12 - 12:06 #6

  Ill be seeing it in 24 fps as none our cinemas will have 48 capability. however, I will judge the film purely on its merit and now how he (the critic) feels about 48 fps.

  0
• Options

  darkjedimaster Posts: 18,621

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  11/12/12 - 12:20 #7

  jafsie wrote: »

  I didn't realise there was a choice?

  
  Yes there are many choices listen on the Odeon website. :eek:
  
  The Hobbit 2D
  The Hobbit 3D
  The Hobbit IMAX 3D
  The Hobbit IMAX 3D HFR
  The Hobbit 3D HFR
  The Hobbit ISENSE 3D HFR

  0
• Options

  Delboy219 Posts: 3,193

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  11/12/12 - 12:37 #8

  If Jackson thinks HFR is so amazing, why isn't there any showings of 48fps in 2D?
  
  I think he's done all this just so people didn't whine about 3D induced headaches/nausea.

  0
• Options

  Gort Posts: 7,467

  Forum Member

  ✭

  11/12/12 - 12:46 #9

  Dai13371 wrote: »

  Nobody forced this critic to watch in it 48fps.

  
  He's a film critic and there to lend a critical appreciation of the film, including the technical stuff. Seeing that the film is in 48fps, and seeing that this is the next big thing for cinema goers, it'd be odd that a film critic wouldn't watch it in 48fps.
  
  BTW, the above is not an indication whether I'm for or against 48fps, for I haven't witnessed it.

  0
• Options

  mred2000 Posts: 10,050

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  11/12/12 - 12:51 #10

  Not just 48fps but I also heard this was filmed in 4k, which many production companies have been jumping over to. This higher res can give the impression of 3D without the need for extra kit like glasses, apparently.

  0