Options

Cutest thing..child models recreate Oscar dresses

[Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 62
Forum Member
Arent they adorable?
http://wp.me/p2EAVa-458
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Saltydog1955Saltydog1955 Posts: 4,134
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Bit too much the unlamented Minipops for me. Quite creepy in fact.
  • Options
    Walter NeffWalter Neff Posts: 9,195
    Forum Member
    ClaireyB wrote: »
    Arent they adorable?
    http://wp.me/p2EAVa-458

    In a word, NO! :eek:

    Creepy would be more appropriate.
  • Options
    Smiley433Smiley433 Posts: 7,896
    Forum Member
    And in another word, why?
  • Options
    fizzycatfizzycat Posts: 6,120
    Forum Member
    Adorable? No, not in the least.

    Creepy and just plain wrong. Very, very wrong.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 30,169
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Bit too much the unlamented Minipops for me. Quite creepy in fact.

    my thoughts too
  • Options
    angelafisherangelafisher Posts: 4,150
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Bit too much the unlamented Minipops for me. Quite creepy in fact.

    I'd agree with that. Why was this even on the news this morning?
  • Options
    blossom24blossom24 Posts: 411
    Forum Member
    No! wrong on so many levels!
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 30,169
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Bit too much the unlamented Minipops for me. Quite creepy in fact.

    the photographer does minipops type of pics too

    http://tricia.bigeyephotography.com/html_gallery.cfm?menu_itemID=1074074&load=html&parentID=1074051

    very creepy
  • Options
    grimtales1grimtales1 Posts: 46,695
    Forum Member
    Looks creepy IMO especially the Halle Berry, Jeniffer Lawrence ones, its like looking at dolls :o
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 488
    Forum Member
    Disgusting
  • Options
    jabegyjabegy Posts: 6,201
    Forum Member
    Sorry, I don't agree, I think children should look like children, they're adorable enough already, they don't need that sort of 'enhancement'.
  • Options
    NotaTypoNotaTypo Posts: 4,253
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Have the daily mail picked up on this yet? They've got an almost Savile-like interest in famous little girls.
  • Options
    IvanIVIvanIV Posts: 30,310
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Something for the paedos.
  • Options
    doom&gloomdoom&gloom Posts: 9,051
    Forum Member
    What a weird reaction.

    They found some child lookalikes for Oscar winners, it's just a bit of fun :confused:

    Has the whole country gone bonkers or just DS?
  • Options
    dee123dee123 Posts: 46,269
    Forum Member
    In a word, NO! :eek:

    Creepy would be more appropriate.

    Exactly.
  • Options
    jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Good God in heaven ---NO !:(
    That is a paedo's (wet)dream.
    Why are they sexualising children ? Idiot parenting (or lack of) there & wrong on every level.
  • Options
    tartan18tartan18 Posts: 2,249
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    doom&gloom wrote: »
    What a weird reaction.

    They found some child lookalikes for Oscar winners, it's just a bit of fun :confused:

    Has the whole country gone bonkers or just DS?

    It's a perfectly normal reaction. This sort of thing is part of the reason the world has gone bonkers
  • Options
    Walter NeffWalter Neff Posts: 9,195
    Forum Member
    doom&gloom wrote: »
    What a weird reaction.

    They found some child lookalikes for Oscar winners, it's just a bit of fun :confused:

    Has the whole country gone bonkers or just DS?

    If you think that it's "just a bit of fun" the you are the one that's bonkers. :rolleyes:
  • Options
    doom&gloomdoom&gloom Posts: 9,051
    Forum Member
    If you think that it's "just a bit of fun" the you are the one that's bonkers. :rolleyes:

    I don't know what pictures you were looking at but I don't see how you can get "disgusting" and "one for the paedos" from some picture of girls in long dresses, yes they're wearing a lot of make-up but they probably wouldn't look like the celebs they're meant to look at otherwise.

    EDIT: Had a look at the photographers website and some of those pictures are a bit dodgy.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,254
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Horrid
  • Options
    Saltydog1955Saltydog1955 Posts: 4,134
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
  • Options
    jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Beyond tacky & into gross. Bet he makes a fortune from people who 'like' those sort of pictures of little children.
    Shades of Jon Benet Ramsay.
  • Options
    doom&gloomdoom&gloom Posts: 9,051
    Forum Member
    janna wrote: »
    Beyond tacky & into gross. Bet he makes a fortune from people who 'like' those sort of pictures of little children.
    Shades of Jon Benet Ramsay.

    Tricia sounds like a woman to me and I'm betting it's middle-aged women who like this sort of cutesy rubbish.
  • Options
    jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    It isn't cute though. Clomping round in mum's high heels wearing one of her frilly tops as an ill fitting dress,and with lipstick on your eyelids & blue eyeshadow on your cheeks is cute. All kids do it. Full professional make-up ,wigs,hairstyling,false lashes & dresses made especially to copy the adult version caters to only one market in my opinion.Most disturbing.
  • Options
    Blondie XBlondie X Posts: 28,662
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    jabegy wrote: »
    Sorry, I don't agree, I think children should look like children, they're adorable enough already, they don't need that sort of 'enhancement'.

    Absolutely. Children done up like adults is just creepy and wrong imo
Sign In or Register to comment.