Options

Do you believe in God?

1304305307309310421

Comments

  • Options
    belly buttonbelly button Posts: 17,026
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    archiver wrote: »

    And lo, it came to pass that God took the bet... :)

    He must be a Christian after all then, as it's the only religion that doesn't mind a little flutter every now and then .
  • Options
    Keyser_Soze1Keyser_Soze1 Posts: 25,182
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I just wish He had not placed all those bloody fossils in the ground. :(

    How many people are going to Hell for believing in evolution?

    Then again they certainly deserve to burn in unendurable agony for all eternity for daring to question the Word of the Lord.

    The filthy Heathen scum. >:(
  • Options
    Stormwave UKStormwave UK Posts: 5,088
    Forum Member
    I just wish He had not placed all those bloody fossils in the ground. :(

    How many people are going to Hell for believing in evolution?

    Then again they certainly deserve to burn in unendurable agony for all eternity for daring to question the Word of the Lord.

    The filthy Heathen scum. >:(

    He's testing our faith, this loving god.

    He put us on earth, made it so we were designed to doubt him, put fake evidence there to mislead us, and the punishes us for all eternity for using the scepticism tool he gifted us with.
  • Options
    SULLASULLA Posts: 149,789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    i prefer to work things out for myself and steer my own course

    Not possible if you are in a job where you have to take orders.
  • Options
    Keyser_Soze1Keyser_Soze1 Posts: 25,182
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    He's testing our faith, this loving god.

    He put us on earth, made it so we were designed to doubt him, put fake evidence there to mislead us, and the punishes us for all eternity for using the scepticism tool he gifted us with.

    He is not a very nice chap really when you come to think of it.

    It's almost as though he was created by a very primitive patriarchal desert tribe. :confused:
  • Options
    Richard46Richard46 Posts: 59,834
    Forum Member
    SULLA wrote: »
    Not possible if you are in a job where you have to take orders.

    Very true so why invent another control freak in our spare time?
  • Options
    KJ44KJ44 Posts: 38,093
    Forum Member
    It's almost as though he was created by a very primitive patriarchal desert tribe. :confused:

    ... and subsequently rebranded based upon focus group results, several times over.
  • Options
    Keyser_Soze1Keyser_Soze1 Posts: 25,182
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    KJ44 wrote: »
    ... and subsequently rebranded based upon focus group results, several times over.

    Exactly. I just wish Islam would be rebranded as well. :cry:
  • Options
    MrQuikeMrQuike Posts: 18,175
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Karma Police, arrest this man, he talks in math, he buzzes like a fridge. :D

    I was referring to a previous convo me and Bolly had about shamanism, and different hypothesis about how shamanistic/ spiritual healing could be achieved. Then it became all quantum physics and I ended up learning a lot, some of which my brain still can't wrap itself around.

    It was in response to "wasn't it that there is a sublevel of consciousness of which we are not aware? A collective? If so how would a person have "free will?"?"
  • Options
    archiverarchiver Posts: 13,011
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    He's testing our faith, this loving god.

    He put us on earth, made it so we were designed to doubt him, put fake evidence there to mislead us, and the punishes us for all eternity for using the scepticism tool he gifted us with.
    Nah. Not likely. True, it's job done - game over for those happily convinced already, but for those of us who truly appreciate this incredibly detailed diversiverse, and believe it to be just what it's intended to look like, and that we really are the result of the tenacity of the will to live honed through very many generations and changes through natural selection - and all the other stuff... Remarkable job. Unbelievable - especially in six days! See. That's another thing the faithful already accept - almost as though it's nothing, but I bet it took loads longer really. At least a fortnight. :)

    Proper job God. I can't see you at all. :D
  • Options
    KJ44KJ44 Posts: 38,093
    Forum Member
    Exactly. I just wish Islam would be rebranded as well. :cry:

    I only have a lack of belief in God(s), I don't take sides in religious matters, because we know where that leads.
  • Options
    Keyser_Soze1Keyser_Soze1 Posts: 25,182
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    KJ44 wrote: »
    I only have a lack of belief in God(s), I don't take sides in religious matters, because we know where that leads.

    True but I would prefer religion to at least try and move with the times.

    Because when it does - like the Church of England - it becomes a much more acceptable institution. :)
  • Options
    MrQuikeMrQuike Posts: 18,175
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    anne_666 wrote: »
    I agree. Doesn't matter a jot if we don't wake up either.

    Aside from any suffering.
  • Options
    MrQuikeMrQuike Posts: 18,175
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    archiver wrote: »
    It's quite a short piece and I'd missed it previously. About this bit:

    “Time, space and causation are like the glass through which the Absolute is seen."

    Couldn't the same be said about everything? Or am I misunderstanding and there exists a "glass through which the Absolute is seen" which time, space and causation are like?

    "In the Absolute there is neither time, space nor causation.”

    Doesn't sound like a good place for a man and his dog. Seems (like) one of those giant leaps again - to presume that something which can only(?) be seen through something else does not have that something else as a property of itself.

    If by no causation is meant unchanging, and this Absolute occupies no space, and has no duration - there can be no "in".

    To be honest I took it as a metaphor of normal consciousness, like looking through glass that distorted the vision - like say a glass bottle. The absolute is distorted when seen through the glass but the glass is an obstruction not a requirement. Also I guess the clarity of your average glass panel has improved somewhat since the India of the 19th century. It's not a question of seeing in the normal sense but of being in a completely different state of consciousness. Using the word "in" is a way of talking and doesn't mean that you are in anything but that the state of being has become absolute. Limitations of language used in the relative to refer to the absolute. .
  • Options
    lightdragonlightdragon Posts: 19,059
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    MrQuike wrote: »
    A collective? If so how would a person have "free will?"?"

    Yeah but we were previously talking about faith healing/shamanism/ the idea of a collective on the quantum level on a different thread a while back. I was just checking that was what we were chatting about.

    That bolly was of the opinion we have free will, but work on a collective level under that, I thought it was impossible to have free will / self awareness in a collective. I was checking I had the right person, and the right recall of that conversation (not actually asking the questions themselves).
  • Options
    archiverarchiver Posts: 13,011
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    MrQuike wrote: »
    To be honest I took it as a metaphor of normal consciousness, like looking through glass that distorted the vision - like say a glass bottle. The absolute is distorted when seen through the glass but the glass is an obstruction not a requirement. Also I guess the clarity of your average glass panel has improved somewhat since the India of the 19th century. It's not a question of seeing in the normal sense but of being in a completely different state of consciousness. Using the word "in" is a way of talking and doesn't mean that you are in anything but that the state of being has become absolute. Limitations of language used in the relative to refer to the absolute. .
    I see. "The Absolute" is a possible state of being? One which normal people can achieve? If it's timeless - wouldn't it be too instantaneous to observe in any state of linear consciousness? Dreams are non linear. Probably dreamed of something big and old and dubbed it The Absolute. No disrespect. :blush:
  • Options
    bollywoodbollywood Posts: 67,769
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Richard46 wrote: »
    Right so it is the one reality he is talking about?

    One whole reality as I see it.

    What is your hidden question?

    Could I buy a vowel?
  • Options
    SULLASULLA Posts: 149,789
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    Richard46 wrote: »
    Very true so why invent another control freak in our spare time?

    Control freaks do not give everyone free will.
  • Options
    CLL DodgeCLL Dodge Posts: 115,873
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭

    Even if He did exist I would not worship Him. The pitiful need for validation like that is more like a child or a psychopath than an entity who created the entire Cosmos. :confused:

    Surely God wouldn't get his/her kicks from beings who were created with no option but to worship him/her. What would be the point?

    Their choosing to do so would be the important part.
  • Options
    mushymanrobmushymanrob Posts: 17,992
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    In your opinion. :)

    Even if He did exist I would not worship Him. The pitiful need for validation like that is more like a child or a psychopath than an entity who created the entire Cosmos. :confused:

    lol... yet another bit of common sense that makes you wonder why people believe that religious guff.... it simply doesnt add up does it.
    SULLA wrote: »
    Not possible if you are in a job where you have to take orders.

    ....which is why im self employed, so i steer my own ship, master of my own destiny.
    SULLA wrote: »
    Control freaks do not give everyone free will.

    and neither did god. we have gone into great detail on this thread as to why god hasnt given you free will.

    we are told he knows what decisions we will all make... that implies that our paths in life are already set out, are pre - destined. in which case theres no freewill.... if we had free will we would be able to chose a different path, make different choices, but we are destined to do what we are destined to do....

    anyway, the whole free will excuse is nothing but one giant cop-out.... a joker card to explain the unexplainable, to try to add reason to an unreasonable proposition. if you were a loving parent, youd make sure your child wouldnt get into any harm. "oh its my babys free will to play with the matches and get burnt"...yeah right... "i told him not to play with the matches but i wanted him to obey me out of love, he chose by free will to ignore me so its his fault hes scared for life"....

    BONKERS.
  • Options
    MrQuikeMrQuike Posts: 18,175
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    archiver wrote: »
    I see. "The Absolute" is a possible state of being? One which normal people can achieve?

    Anyone anytime. The obstacles are our own beliefs, obsessions, actions and repressions.

    If it's timeless - wouldn't it be too instantaneous to observe in any state of linear consciousness? Dreams are non linear. Probably dreamed of something big and old and dubbed it The Absolute. No disrespect. :blush:

    Yes, that's what I've been saying in previous posts. It would be like you just turned off but time had passed - like having had general aneastheic but quicker. It would be a state of transcendence. The difference would be , on return to everyday consciousness, that you would be affected by it but according to your own individuality, beliefs and boundaries. So for example you might feel a great sense of peace, love, silence, awe or you might have had visions or meaningful dramas - you may even have returned with something metaphorical but useful. Eventually there would be a state where the selfish ego-mind has lost it's fear and allowed itself union with the higher Self - this has been referred to as enlightenment. It would be like the parable of the return of the prodigal son. IMO..
  • Options
    MrQuikeMrQuike Posts: 18,175
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Yeah but we were previously talking about faith healing/shamanism/ the idea of a collective on the quantum level on a different thread a while back. I was just checking that was what we were chatting about.

    That bolly was of the opinion we have free will, but work on a collective level under that, I thought it was impossible to have free will / self awareness in a collective. I was checking I had the right person, and the right recall of that conversation (not actually asking the questions themselves).

    Sorry...It's a great question though. Yeah breakfast time so I'm going with... percolation. :D
  • Options
    MrQuikeMrQuike Posts: 18,175
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    anne_666 wrote: »
    I agree. Doesn't matter a jot if we don't wake up either.

    Though you might want to expedite matter if the legions of Rome are gathering on your borders and your collective "chosen" speciality is religion and spirituality, as in "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's". Had the advice been taken this might have avoided one hell of a blood sacrifice that continues to this day.
  • Options
    bollywoodbollywood Posts: 67,769
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    MrQuike wrote: »
    It was in response to "wasn't it that there is a sublevel of consciousness of which we are not aware? A collective? If so how would a person have "free will?"?"

    How would another order of consciousness prevent us from having free will?

    The amount of free will that humans have, even in Judaeo Christian concepts of free will, is rather small, anyway.

    It mostly defines moral decision making and the ability to accept or reject God.
  • Options
    MrQuikeMrQuike Posts: 18,175
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    bollywood wrote: »
    How would another order of consciousness prevent us from having free will?

    The amount of free will that humans have, even in Judaeo Christian concepts of free will, is rather small.

    That was my thinking. The largely absent free will is with the relativity of things and in our case the human-ness. It's missing because we hid it in separate places. That sort of makes sense to me. Hence I posted "Its a question of waking up and becoming all of ourself" and prior to that "Existence is free because it has no cause."

    Someone thwack me with a big stick...:D
This discussion has been closed.