As for the QT non-issue, as anyone who has ever been on the programme knows, the bulk of the tickets are distributed by local political parties, which is why there are always outspoken and partisan comments made from all directions.
Surely if the BBC has a progressive bias, it should be hoping that the Pope is a conservative?
The best way to accelerate religious decline is for religion itself to retreat into its box.
I guess it depends on whether all the progressives have already left. A conservative leader might stop the rest from leaving, but I doubt that many people would go back once they've realised what a bunch of nonsense it all was.
Nice little quite to show how progressive and forward thinking this new pope is.
Women are naturally unfit for political office (…) The natural order and facts teach us that man is a politician par excellence, the Scriptures show us that woman is always the supporter of man, the thinker and doer, but nothing more than that
I thought that the BBC gave a totally supportive reaction to the new pope. It annoyed me a bit that some referred toi Francis The First, but otherwise it was a bit too reverential about him for me. They seemed delighted that he is a conservative. After all, we can not have a sensible pope.
No hidden agenda, Aunty is openly young, gay and ethnic with a liberal-left Guardian reading cultural bias
I totally disagree. Having followed the quite blatant bias towards the religious in the reports on equal marriage it's obvious the BBC wants to create a story about the new Pope rather than show any support for LGBT rights. It's most certainly not a pro-gay organisation.
Ah you mean human, surely that means the people opposing them are close minded, old, homophobic and white with a rabid-right Daily Mail reading anti-cultural bias.
Old people oppose young and white people oppose blacks.
You need to get out more.
Comments
Or are they simply asking the questions that many people (especially Catholics) might be asking?
And maybe it's you with the (less than) hidden agenda.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2292995/Question-Time-How-Labour-Party-planted-diehard-supporter-audience-attack-UKIP-panellist.html
Who knows, the Michael from London email on the BBC timeline at 18.49 could have been dreamed up in their newsroom, nobody knows?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21777747
Yes nobody knows but it doesn't stop people making up ridiculous conspiracy theories does it.
Indeed. Who know? Do you?
No you don't.
As for the QT non-issue, as anyone who has ever been on the programme knows, the bulk of the tickets are distributed by local political parties, which is why there are always outspoken and partisan comments made from all directions.
The Question Time stooge: How Labour Party planted a diehard supporter in the BBC audience to attack UKIP panellist on debate show
So it was the LABOUR PARTY who allegedly "planted the stooge", not the BBC.
And, as has been stated both here and by the BBC, the audience is drawn from a cross-section of people, many from political parties.
And another report from The Express:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/384226/Labour-supporter-planted-in-BBC-Question-Time-audience-to-attack-UKIP-panelist
But hey, why not blame the BBC, after all it is a ridiculous conspiracy theory.
Well, YOU don't, that's for sure. Any more silly theories?
The best way to accelerate religious decline is for religion itself to retreat into its box.
I guess it depends on whether all the progressives have already left. A conservative leader might stop the rest from leaving, but I doubt that many people would go back once they've realised what a bunch of nonsense it all was.
Shades of malleus maleficarum
Yes I can see him getting the hammer of witches out.
Old people oppose young and white people oppose blacks.
You need to get out more.
However many times it's asked doesn't change the fact it's a bloody stupid question.
Couldn't agree more.
Very probably a hell of a lot MORE people than the BBC are upset that the new pope is not progressive!