Options
1980s missing pedo dossier
Robbedin73
Posts: 7,859 Forum Member
✭
More I hear of this, am
Pretty sure it was right at top of Thatcher government or even somebody close to her
Which is why the name won't or maybe for legal reasons can't be revealed they are probably not still around either, so unlikely to be revealed now, might be few very worried 1980s veteran cabinet ministers though
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28141531
Pretty sure it was right at top of Thatcher government or even somebody close to her
Which is why the name won't or maybe for legal reasons can't be revealed they are probably not still around either, so unlikely to be revealed now, might be few very worried 1980s veteran cabinet ministers though
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28141531
0
Comments
Given Popbitch named Harris and Saville as abusers more than a decade ago.
The linked BBC story makes it clear that Home Office had found a letter from Lord Brittan that relates to the allegations that were contained in the dossier, so why do you say "may or may not have contained allegations"?
Whether all the allegations were valid is another matter, but the disappearance of the dossier makes the whole thing look very suspect.
The way of the world, people.
Much as I hate to believe it, I think more and more that there is one law for them and another for the rest of us.
........and then this suddenly appears on the BBC news.......
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28181045
It does seem as though investigators, police and journalists are skirting around something waiting for the lid to blow off before they all pile in......
What are the allegations? Unknown.
By and against whom? Unknown.
Was the dossier misplaced or lost deliberately? Unknown.
Who misplaced or discarded it? Unknown.
All those unknowns are like a red rag to a bull for every paedo obsessed conspiracy loving fruit cake in this country to start banging away at their keyboard, frantically hammering out every outlandish notion their fevered mind can concoct.
If a crime has been committed it should be investigated by police and charges can be brought, has a crime been committed? Oh wait I will answer that, unknown.
Senior politicians and others in positions of power. Sounds quite interesting to me.
This is the crux of the story.
Again, this is the crux of the story.
Why would you care? Read it if it interests you. Ignore it if it doesn't.
You seem to be missing the point. The fact of the matter is that crimes may have been committed by very powerful people, but their powerful positions meant that the crimes were not properly investigated and charges were not made. Not entirely without precedent.
I don't understand why this seems to bother you so much.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2681909/Leon-Brittan-quizzed-teen-rape-claim-Ex-Home-Secretary-accused-attacking-student-flat.html#ixzz36fbxQjsd
I know my history and this sort of rampant public hysteria, speculation and denunciation never ends well. A great many innocent people over the course of human history have suffered due to the culture we are feeding now.
I never thought I would see a situation in this country where we have a form of sexual abuse based McCarthyism.
An uncorroborated sexual accusation from 30, 40 , 50 years ago sufficient to convict, the mere accusation of sexual offence enough to start gossip and a lingering suspicion of guilt.
It will burn itself out eventually but how many lives and reputations will be ruined or unjust convictions made before that happens? How many would be an acceptable price to pay?
There used to be a maxim of justice that better 100 guilty men go free than one innocent man convicted for a crime they did not commit, I don't think that maxim holds true anymore.
What would you like to happen now? Ask everyone not to rock the boat and to just accept that powerful people got away with such crimes in the past?
I have always said that since Savile. There had to be people highr up covering for him and they were involved in it as well. However I expect a few more old celebs will be thrown to the lions and the MP's and Police Chiefs will be getting away scott free.
This is two years old but is believed to be at centre of scandal, and as no names are involved it shouldnt breech ds lposting laws
http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/elm-guest-house-the-start-of-the-cover-up/
Surprised you not calling people left-wing loons or something similar.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28182373
114 potential files going missing, by whom and why.
Were these missing files in one folder, or was someone picking them up as they came in.
Whatever the case, whatever side of the political fence your on, if someone has been using the tools of the state to cover their/they're tracks it needs to be disclosed.
There is of course no left or right about it - this potentially affects all three main parties. Cyril Smith was a Labour party member until the late 1960s - for example.
I have seen allegations on the internet about a Prime Minister who never married.
The undetected inter-stellar invasion force of Lizard royals.
Nothing would surprise me
Passports, education, trojan horses, healthcare, leadership in fighting, a. n. other?
Its not about party politics, its far beyond that... if this has gone on then something should be done. If they've done nowt wrong why are they avoiding an inquiry... why are the likes of Tebbit suddenly crawling out from their rocks to talk on the matter
Celebrities and Personalities is one thing, we're talking about the people that are supposed to be running the country
I think the point is that this can all run away quickly and we just get to the pitchfork and burning torch brigade
rumours speculation and innuendo are not evidence
much like the bandwagon jumpers after savile and harris
84/89 could be involved , names (which they obviously can't reveal ) have been leaked to BBC
Try as he might I don't think dave can ignore this one , even though am sure he like to