Options
What do you prefer?
[Deleted User]
Posts: 374
Forum Member
✭
A whodunnit storyline or a storyline where you know who the culprit is?
For example, do you prefer to watch a storyline and be oblivious for month to who did it? i.e Archie's murder, who shot Phil, who attacked Tracey etc.
Or would do you prefer to know all along who did it and watch the characters on the show not know and guess etc etc i.e the emmerdale fire.
We tend to see more whodunnits than weknowwhodunnits. I much prefer the whodunnits I love the expense of the run up to the big reveal of a whodunnit where as when I know who done it I get really bored and frustrated which leads me to turn off.
Slight overuse of the words who done it, sorry
Feel free to share your opinions.
For example, do you prefer to watch a storyline and be oblivious for month to who did it? i.e Archie's murder, who shot Phil, who attacked Tracey etc.
Or would do you prefer to know all along who did it and watch the characters on the show not know and guess etc etc i.e the emmerdale fire.
We tend to see more whodunnits than weknowwhodunnits. I much prefer the whodunnits I love the expense of the run up to the big reveal of a whodunnit where as when I know who done it I get really bored and frustrated which leads me to turn off.
Slight overuse of the words who done it, sorry
Feel free to share your opinions.
0
Comments
Whodunnits bore me to death because IMO they usually drag them out too long
i'm the same , plus the fact i usually guess who it was straight away(e.g stacey)
Did you put a bet on it?
i'm too young lol(i was 15):D
The whole "Who killed Tom King?" on ED that dragged on for months and months ruined it because no one cared by the end.
Whodunnits are all too common now (especially in Eastenders) that the suspense just isn't there anymore. I find myself not really caring and losing interest. The who shot Phil story from 10 years ago was fantastic though. It had me glued. But that's because it was an original idea back then.