A thought on BT's Sports channels
[Deleted User]
Posts: 302
Forum Member
✭
So, Sky Sports is now only available to new subscribers on infinity. Wouldn't it make sense to cease broadcast of the Sky channels over the air, and replace them with BT's own channels in the short term?
0
Comments
I can 'imagine' though, ALL of the non-freeview channels (Sky Sports, ESPN and the linear channels already announced) being piped down your broadband, appearing in the EPG and being of a very good quality.
I've been hugely critical of BT's communication in the past, but at the moment I'm seeing them in a new light.
What I'm seeing of the new Vision platform I'm liking...big time
Sports channels announced where, andyf94?
I don't understand masona, I didn't mention 'sports channels'
.... I said I could imagine Sky Sports and ESPN being piped through broadband....what's your point?
Sky Sports 1-4, F1 and Sky Sports News are already IPTV channels on TalkTalk's Youview. ESPN, too.
I don't expect more than SS1 and 2 on BT though.
Anyhow, with the package BT seems to be pulling together with Vision it seems to me that they have a real alternative to the main pay TV provider in the UK...depending of course, on what your preferences are...
Competition is good as far as I'm concerned, and I'm liking what the Vision platform is turning into
...and I like what the B in BT means....
No, neither do I. Sky would be loathe to give BT any more channels than what they have to.
Sky don't view TalkTalk as being a threat. BT, they do.
,,,,and Sky will be more than happy to get as many as possible YouView customers locked into an 18 month TalkTalk contract before BT Sport arrives.
Ha ha ha! Yeah. TalkTalk went to market early, and judging by their recent published results, YouView has been a smash hit for them.
And I expect BT Sports will be available on the TT platform too. And by then, all linear channels will be recordable too.
Maybe it will. I wonder how many will take both Sky Sports for £30 and BT Sport for £???.
Or will it be like Setanta/ESPN where only a small minority of Sky Sports subscribers have paid extra for a comparatively small amount of extra matches?
Plus, there's still no deal for Sky branded linear channels on BT's YouView, so it may just be the 'statutory' SS1&2.
That's what everyone else is wondering too.
But they will be there (1&2 I mean), it's the pricing which will be interesting. As BT are expected to offer their own users such at a substantial discount, and BT Sports too. And while the games may be small in number (38) not all will be small in stature.
Whilst theres nothing wrong with sticking your neck out, no, there won't, unfortunately. Not that I would watch SS 3&4 anyway.
I'm just wondering if 1&2 will be offered in HD on the new YouView platform. As thats unconfirmed, at the moment. But I don't think they will be. Though that is just a guess.
Agreed. You dealt with that much better than I would have done
True. And if I came across 100% like I know, I don't. So apologies for coming across that way.
But I do know none of the channels at the moment are in HD.
But as you have pointed out, 1andrew1, the situation as it stands is fluid, until the agreements have actually been agreed.
Indeed, there are many unknowns, at the moment, so it should be an interesting 12 months...
I, and like many people I know, have no intention of subscribing to the new BT sports, nor sky sports.
I am now glad that I have the likes of GOLD, E!, and crime and investigation via my broadband connection though.
Sky sports has been one of the major drivers in pay tv. People want it - yes i get not everyone is interested but there is a significant market out there with people willing to pay for those channels.
Until Sky Sports arrived on the Freeview platform the majority of the country had 1 single supplier. Sky Sports is now available to almost all of the UK through different providers.
So why is it a game changer - It's a game changer when there a company with a significant monopoly have the first floodgate opened and consumers have choice.
The same happened to BT through regulation, BT (and Virgin) want the same to happen to Sky's TV channels.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/9876215/Sky-v-BT-Vision-just-think-Manchester-United-against-Manchester-City.html
Thanks for sharing.
I've never thought of it like that before, but I like the way they go in from the angle of Man U (Sky) and Man City (BT). Can't wait to see how noisy those neighbours get
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-2280756/BT-Sport-target-Rio-Ferdinand-leading-pundit--Charles-Sale.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Thanks for that link. A good read. So BT will initially be losing money on this new venture hand over fist. Which isn't a surprise. After all, how many billions did Sky lose, in the first five years of it's operation? I suppose its just short term loss for long term gain.
However, the only disadvantage for BT is that anyone can buy a dish, but not everyone can get Multicast. Oh I'm sure they'll get there in the end, but not from launch, unfortunately.
Maybe BT will throw everyone a curve ball or two. Stay on DTT, and also take over CH34 too, launch over fibre and launch over DSL as well. Who knows?