So disappointed that Danielle felt she had to apologise
Paace
Posts: 14,679 Forum Member
✭✭
So disappointed that Danielle felt she had to apologise to that B. Helen when everything she said was true .
It's Helen who should have been removed from the house for threatening to punch Danielle and for her profanity in blaspheming the founder of the Christian religion and insulting millions of people .
Must be one of the worst decisions ever giving her a free pass to the final .
It's Helen who should have been removed from the house for threatening to punch Danielle and for her profanity in blaspheming the founder of the Christian religion and insulting millions of people .
Must be one of the worst decisions ever giving her a free pass to the final .
0
Comments
If it's any consolation, I doubt the apology was sincere. Unless sincerity is important to you but evidently it's no biggy to Danielle
What was really telling was how when Danielle exposed her underbelly and tried to apologise Helen then seized the opportunity to attack her again. She's a genuinely ugly and vicious person.
She's fast dropped the 'easy going, fun and down to earth' bullshit, I can't find a redeeming feature in the woman.
Danielle was 100% in the wrong. She was the instigator.
Its Helen who took things to a completely unacceptable level and if only BB were consistent in their decisions she must be removed .
Neither of them came out of it covered in glory. Both needed to apologise for what they said that night. Danielle was the bigger person though and managed to see the error of her ways first.
I think the REAL instigator was Steven when he told Helen and their little gang that Danielle called them slags. That little snide knew exactly what he was doing and he seized on the opportunity, and he's still doing it now. Check out whenever someone is badmouthing or confronting another housemate, like when Pauline had a go at Christopher, and Steven is always there sniggering in the background. Just a very unpleasant individual and in my opinion much worse than Helen actually.
I think they did the right thing talking it over but I do have to whether they'll clash again if Danielle stays in.
No. If someone comes to you and asks you, quite justifiably, if it's true you've just called them a slag, and your reaction is to shout f**k off, f**k off, f**k off you f**king weirdo, that is not acceptable behaviour.
I agree that any threat of violence, real or not, is a new level of unacceptable but it does not mean that the above becomes acceptable. Helen's insults were more colourful perhaps but calling someone a slag and constantly berating their morals to anyone who will listen makes you fair game for your own morals to be criticised, whether they are a higher power dictated world recognised collective morals or not.
Exactly, and if she stays on Friday, this will be one of the main reasons.
No, Danielle was the instigator. She was on the war path from the moment her name was read out, threatening to tell everyone what she thought of them, and ranting and raving. Complaining that she's only up because she wouldn't act like a slag, implying that the other girls had acted like slags. She was out of control and all because she's up for eviction.
Danielle was 100% to blame.
Yeah, sometimes, even if you feel you are right it is (or can be) the more sensible thing to breach the divide by holding out your hand (metaphorically speaking) first, which in this case was opting to apologise first. So I would give her some degree of kudos here.
Alongside that, I would have more respect for Danille (within that specific argument situation) if she had admitted she had used the term slag (as you mention). Being as adamant as she was that she hadn't uttered it (when Kim tried to remind her she had) made her look either forgetful at best, or a blatant lyer at worst. It was after all the slag comment that made Helen sound off initally which then led to the rubbish exchanges from both their mouths that ensued after, so she could have relieved the argument earlier if she had just confessed (like the good christian that she sees hersefl as) that she indeed did form the basis of the argument by saying that particular word.
Certainly Helen shouldn't have stooped too such personal comment making about Danielle's looks, as those insults were unrealted to the issue and plucked out of some seperate prejudice or dislike that Helen perhaps has. Alternatively, the slag comment was uncessary in the context of why Danielle was using it, I personally thought. There are other terms, less offensive that could have explained how she percieved certain people to be as, like them or not, I don't think any girl yet has behaved in a 'slagish way' in the house (and outside of it none of us wouod know anyway in which to judge as we only know them frm what they are in the house). Generally, neither of them particulalry helped themselves from this pointless argument.
Sometimes i think people are so blind. If Danielle didn't like what was being said she should have just walked away and kept quiet but no she had to attack hms in the most vile and rude way just because they dared to talk about something she doesn't agree with.
The behavior after the noms result took it to a whole new level telling people how she was going to tell them what she thought before she left. And spitting venom with the most rude nasty language just because she was up, to suggest she shouldn't have apologize is a joke, she behaved just as nasty as Helen if not worse as she claimed to be this and that person when she wasn't and started the whole thing by her poor attitude.
No. Steven was.